Jessica Little1, Christopher Rajkumar2, Waqar Saleem1. 1. Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charring Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, UK.
Abstract
Malignant meningitis is a rare condition with varied clinical presentations, often mimicking other neurological conditions. Here we report a rare case of malignant meningitis from primary bronchogenic melanoma. The patient initially presented with vomiting and headache. Over the next 12 days she developed rapidly progressive neurology: losing mental faculties, vision, hearing and limb power. Lumbar puncture results revealed malignant cells. Computer tomography of the chest found an endobronchial lesion which was later biopsied and histology revealed a melanoma. This condition is very rare and diagnosis was difficult. We discuss ideas to help expedite diagnosis and management of such cases in the future.
Malignant meningitis is a rare condition with varied clinical presentations, often mimicking other neurological conditions. Here we report a rare case of malignant meningitis from primary bronchogenic melanoma. The patient initially presented with vomiting and headache. Over the next 12 days she developed rapidly progressive neurology: losing mental faculties, vision, hearing and limb power. Lumbar puncture results revealed malignant cells. Computer tomography of the chest found an endobronchial lesion which was later biopsied and histology revealed a melanoma. This condition is very rare and diagnosis was difficult. We discuss ideas to help expedite diagnosis and management of such cases in the future.
Malignant meningitis is a rare condition that occurs when malignant cells infiltrate the leptomeninges and disseminate within the cerebro-spinal-fluid (CSF) [1, 2]. The most common primary tumours are breast, lung, melanoma and haematological malignancies [1, 3, 4]. The condition results in a variety of presentations and mimics other neurological conditions [1, 5]. Diagnosis is difficult and confirmed by malignant cells on CSF analysis and characteristic signs on MRI [1]. CSF protein and lactate are usually raised [3]. After tissue diagnosis, management options include radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Prognosis remains poor since presentation is usually late and disease rapidly progressive [6-8].
CASE REPORT
Day 1
A 51-year-old Portuguese female visited A&E with a headache and vomiting. She had a transurethral resection for superficial bladder cancer 2 years ago and a pacemaker for mobitz-type-2 heartblock. She had a 35-pack-year smoking history and drank 10 units of alcohol per week. Over the preceding 3 weeks she had several hospital attendances with epigastric pain and vomiting. Investigations had been normal—she was diagnosed with gastroenteritis and discharged.This occasion, she reported ongoing epigastric pain, vomiting and new postural headaches associated with neck pain and photophobia. She had noticed progressive vision loss and unsteady gait. She denied fevers or weight-loss. On examination her GCS was 15, she had bilateral papilloedema and visual acuity reduced to hand-movement on the left. The rest of the cranial nerves III–XII and peripheral neurological examination were unremarkable, apart from an ataxic gait. She had normal observations, blood tests and x-rays. CT head and lumbar puncture were performed and she was commenced on antibiotics and antivirals to cover infective meningitis.CT head revealed a contrast-enhancing lesion in the left pre-pontine region, likely to be a trigeminal schwannoma or metastatic deposit (Fig. 1). Lumbar puncture found clear CSF, normal opening pressures, WCC 4, raised protein 2.51 and low glucose 0.3.
Figure 1:
CT scan demonstrating a contrast-enhancing lesion in the left pre-pontine region, likely to be a trigeminal schwannoma or metastatic deposit.
CT scan demonstrating a contrast-enhancing lesion in the left pre-pontine region, likely to be a trigeminal schwannoma or metastatic deposit.Since the CT findings did not explain the clinical picture, an MRI head was recommended. This had to be performed at another trust since we did not have a pacemaker-compatible scanner.
Days 2–4
The patient was reviewed by neurology, infectious-diseases, ophthalmology and microbiology. Differentials included infective (particularly TB and fungal), inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. CT-venography showed no evidence of venous sinus thrombosis. Further tests included: B12/folate, LDH, ESR, hormones, ACE, immunoglobulins, complement, autoimmune and porphyria screen, tumour markers, myeloma-screen, TB ellipspot, hepatitis, HIV, CMV, cryptococcal, aspergillus, toxoplasmosis and Borrelia burgdorferi. All results were unremarkable.Further CSF results revealed no bacterial, acid-fast-bacilli or fungal growth, viral and TB PCR were negative. CSF cytology showed malignant cells (Fig. 2).
Figure 2:
Photograph of cytological slide prepared from CSF (Leishman Giemsa stain, 20× magnification). Image shows atypical large cells with prominent nucleoli, abundant cytoplasm and atypical mitosis. There are also some lymphocytes present.
Photograph of cytological slide prepared from CSF (Leishman Giemsa stain, 20× magnification). Image shows atypical large cells with prominent nucleoli, abundant cytoplasm and atypical mitosis. There are also some lymphocytes present.CT chest, abdomen and pelvis found a solitary 15 mm parenchymal lung nodule and a 5 mm endobronchial lesion in the right lower lobe.
Day 5
In light of these findings; antimicrobials were stopped, dexamethasone plus a proton-pump-inhibitor started and an MRI spine, head and orbits requested. The working diagnosis was malignant meningitis of unknown primary cancer. Bronchoscopy confirmed an endobronchial tumour. The patient was transferred to oncology while awaiting histology.
Days 6–8
Further examination found no lymphadenopathy, suspicious skin or ophthalmic lesions. She had left nipple inversion (longstanding), but no breast lumps or skin changes. An urgent breast clinic appointment and mammogram were arranged and ER/PR/HER-2 status requested on CSF.During this time she deteriorated with confusion (GCS 14) and rapidly progressive neurology: tinnitus, hearing loss and bilateral proximal lower limb weakness (power 3–4/5). She lost 5 kg of weight in 2 weeks.
Days 9–12
The patient became agitated and complained of severe headaches. She had decreased vision in the right eye and complete blindness in the left. She developed worsening leg weakness (power 2/5) and urinary incontinence. Detailed neurological examination became difficult due to confusion and agitation. Morphine and Midazolam were started for comfort.On Day 10 her GCS decreased to 12 and symptoms progressed further. Despite best efforts, she was too unwell to attend the MRI appointment. Histopathological analysis revealed melanoma (cells expressed: S100p, Melan A and HMB45 and were immunonegative for: AE1/3, p63 and TTF1) (Figs 3–5). Given her poor performance-status and rapid decline, the patient was not fit for any cancer treatment. She was transferred to a hospice on Day 12.
Figure 3:
Photograph of histopathological slide prepared from endobronchial biopsy (H&E stain, 20× magnification). Image shows malignant cells with abundant cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei and nucleoli and spindling.
Figure 5:
Photograph of histopathological slide prepared from endobronchial biopsy (10× magnification)—showing positive immunohistochemical staining for Melan A.
Photograph of histopathological slide prepared from endobronchial biopsy (H&E stain, 20× magnification). Image shows malignant cells with abundant cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei and nucleoli and spindling.Photograph of histopathological slide prepared from endobronchial biopsy (10× magnification)—showing positive immunohistochemical staining for S100pPhotograph of histopathological slide prepared from endobronchial biopsy (10× magnification)—showing positive immunohistochemical staining for Melan A.
DISCUSSION
We have presented a rare case of malignant meningitis from a primary melanoma. In the absence of disease elsewhere and a discrete lung mass with corresponding histology shown on CT, this may represent a case of bronchogenic melanoma [9]. Primary malignant melanoma originating from an extra-cutaneous site is rare—and primary bronchogenic melanoma is one of the rarest visceral manifestations (0.01% of all primary lung tumours) [10]. There are only 41 reported cases in English literature—at least 8 of these had brain metastases at diagnosis [10]. Prognosis is extremely poor with a minority of patients surviving greater than 18 months [10].Systemic therapy cannot be given until histological confirmation of diagnosis. A potential treatment option is tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. In our case, even if histology had been known earlier, it is unlikely the outcome would have changed since the patient deteriorated so quickly. Never-the-less we have highlighted a number of learning points to help expedite diagnosis and management of such cases.
Learning points
This patient had three previous visits to A&E with similar symptoms before she was admitted. This highlights the importance of asking about headaches when someone presents with vomiting and having a high index of suspicion—particularly with a previous history of cancer.At Imperial NHS Trust, we are fortunate to benefit from readily available expert opinions and reviews from multiple specialties when diagnosis is uncertain. Multiple opinions, however, led to numerous investigations being performed. These took up time, resources and on the whole did not help with diagnosis—especially once malignant cells had been identified. Lumbar puncture and imaging are the investigations that should be prioritized. In the case presented, since the pacemaker created difficulties obtaining an MRI, CSF cytological examination was the most important investigation and should have been expedited.This case highlighted the need for a specialized lepto-meningeal service that Imperial are currently in the process of developing. This service should be able to organize the necessary investigations (including MRI) and facilitate treatment quicker and more efficiently in the future.
Authors: Kenneth A Katz; Eric Jonasch; F Stephen Hodi; Robert Soiffer; Kimberly Kwitkiwski; Arthur J Sober; Frank G Haluska Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Ivana Zadro; Vesna V Brinar; Barbara Barun; David Ozretić; Leo Pazanin; Gordan Grahovac; Mario Habek Journal: Neurologist Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.398
Authors: Georgios Rigakos; Chrysoula I Liakou; Naillid Felipe; Dennis Orkoulas-Razis; Evangelia Razis Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Isabella C Glitza; Cara Haymaker; Chantale Bernatchez; Luis Vence; Michelle Rohlfs; Jessie Richard; Carol Lacey; Rahmatu Mansaray; Orenthial J Fulbright; Renjith Ramachandran; Christopher Toth; Seth Wardell; Sapna P Patel; Scott E Woodman; Wen-Jen Hwu; Laszlo G Radvanyi; Michael A Davies; Nicholas E Papadopoulos; Patrick Hwu Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Jeffrey V Brower; Sandeep Saha; Stephen A Rosenberg; Craig R Hullett; H Ian Robins Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Christos Kyriakopoulos; George Zarkavelis; Artemis Andrianopoulou; Alexandra Papoudou-Bai; Dimitrios Stefanou; Stergios Boussios; George Pentheroudakis Journal: Case Rep Oncol Med Date: 2017-03-02