| Literature DB >> 30697329 |
Charles Veys1, Fokion Chatziavgerinos2, Ali AlSuwaidi1, James Hibbert1, Mark Hansen3, Gytis Bernotas3, Melvyn Smith3, Hujun Yin1, Stephen Rolfe2, Bruce Grieve1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of spectral imaging within the plant phenotyping and breeding community has been increasing due its utility as a non-invasive diagnostic tool. However, there is a lack of imaging systems targeted specifically at plant science duties, resulting in low precision for canopy-scale measurements. This study trials a prototype multispectral system designed specifically for plant studies and looks at its use as an early detection system for visually asymptomatic disease phases, in this case Pyrenopeziza brassicae in Brassica napus. The analysis takes advantage of machine learning in the form of feature selection and novelty detection to facilitate the classification. An initial study into recording the morphology of the samples is also included to allow for further improvement to the system performance.Entities:
Keywords: Disease detection; Light leaf spot; Machine learning; Multispectral; Novelty detection; Oilseed rape; Orientation effects; Photometric stereo; Preprocessing; Support vector machine
Year: 2019 PMID: 30697329 PMCID: PMC6345015 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0389-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Fig. 1Pathogen life-cycle evolution. Pyrenopeziza brassicae infection necrotic development on leaf tissue showing early phase senescence (top) and lesions from a late-stage sample (bottom) both showing a colour-coded stage of infection. Included for information is a 40 microscopy evaluation from each sample
Fig. 2Scanning set-up. Side-view diagram of apparatus set-up for canopy and PS imaging (left) and detached leaf assay with MSI (centre) showing the major system components with three-dimensional view (right)
Average classification rate of LLS in OSR (Charger) using spectral indices and selected wavelength at canopy and leaf scale
| Input | Average classification rate % (std) | |
|---|---|---|
| Plant | Leaf | |
| NDVI [ | 36.6 (0.02) | 63.1 (0.02) |
| PSRI [ | 40.5 (0.04) | 61.9 (0.02) |
| DWSI [ | 49.0 (0.04) | 55.1 (0.02) |
| CLS [ | 52.2 (0.06) | 65.6 (0.03) |
| CTR1 [ | 52.4 (0.05) | 67.9 (0.03) |
| ARI [ | 56.8 (0.05) | 70.5 (0.02) |
| PRI [ | 59.5 (0.04) | 55.3 (0.02) |
| LLSI [this study] | 59.5 (0.04) | 75.0 (0.02) |
| MSI spectra | 60.4 (0.05) | 71.6 (0.02) |
| FS spectra | 62.4 (0.05) | 75.3 (0.02) |
Note this classification uses one variety to compare the trials over all time points
Classification rate comparison using ND-SVM for each cultivar with the resistance rating (/10) shown on fixed leaf data
| DAI | Average classification rate % (std) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol (2) | Charger (4) | Cracker (9) | Temple (7) | |
| 26 | 82.8 (0.04) | 50.8 (0.07) | 81.8 (0.04) | 82.9 (0.05) |
| 28 | 81.7 (0.05) | 61.8 (0.08) | 82.5 (0.05) | 74.0 (0.07) |
| 31 | 85.3 (0.07) | 77.2 (0.07) | 80.6 (0.06) | 81.2 (0.06) |
| 34 | 87.0 (0.10) | 80.7 (0.12) | 83.8 (0.08) | 87.0 (0.11) |
Fig. 3Infection Detection. Pathogen ingress detection demonstrated using the LLS for leaf and CTR1 for plant to outline disease severity, shown as a percentage, and distribution across a representative subset of the trial dates. The SVI colormap is normalised between 0 and 1 to display the infection intensity and distribution. The spatial scale is 1:25 with the 10 mm grid shown
Fig. 4Reflectance Spectra. Reflectance spectra of ROI, identified by LLSI for detached leaves (left) and CTR1 for entire plants (right) normalised to a control spectra at each time-point. The FS wavelengths are highlighted to show points of differentiation
Classification rate improvement of using ND-SVM compared to conventional SVM for FS spectra of LLS in OSR entire plants (Charger)
| DAI | Average classification rate % (std) | |
|---|---|---|
| SVM | ND-SVM | |
| 03 | 61.6 (0.04) | 82.6 (0.07) |
| 06 | 64.4 (0.04) | 83.4 (0.03) |
| 09 | 66.7 (0.04) | 88.3 (0.02) |
| 12 | 73.3 (0.03) | 92.2 (0.01) |
| 15 | 75.0 (0.03) | 92.3 (0.02) |
| 21 | 78.8 (0.04) | 93.5 (0.01) |
| 24 | 91.8 (0.02) | 94.5 (0.02) |
| 27 | 94.2 (0.03) | 94.7 (0.02) |
| 31 | 97.7 (0.03) | 96.7 (0.03) |
Classification rate comparison using conventional SVM for each cultivar with the resistance rating (/10) shown on fixed leaf data
| DAI | Average classification rate % (std) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol (2) | Charger (4) | Cracker (9) | Temple (7) | |
| 26 | 69.3 (0.03) | 72.9 (0.05) | 57.1 (0.06) | 73.7 (0.06) |
| 28 | 68.0 (0.04) | 75.2 (0.06) | 60.6 (0.06) | 69.3 (0.07) |
| 31 | 70.0 (0.04) | 77.8 (0.08) | 67.6 (0.09) | 70.2 (0.08) |
| 34 | 74.2 (0.06) | 78.5 (0.04) | 75.8 (0.11) | 77.0 (0.09) |
Fig. 5Orientation effects. Variation in reflectance measured at high (blue) [] and low (red) [] inclination normalisation (left) PS reconstruction of control oilseed rape plant, at 03 DAI with excessive curvature of leaves highlighted with arrows (right)