Literature DB >> 30697311

Molecular Characterization of Echinococcus granulosus Sensu Lato from Livestock in North Khorasan Province, Iran.

Mitra Salehi1,2,3, Saeed Yaghfoori4, Pejman Bahari3, Mohsen Seyedabadi2,3, Sima Parande Shirvan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Echinococcus granulosus is one the most important zoonotic disease which is endemic in worldwide. Molecular method has allowed discrimination of different genotypes (G1-G10), providing new approach in development of prevention and control program of hydatid cyst. This study was conducted to identify the genotypes of E. granulosus from domestic animals in nine districts of North Khorasan Province using the mitochondrial cox1 gene sequence.
METHODS: Overall, 122 hydatid cyst were collected during 2016-2017 from sheep (n=43) and cattle (n=79). DNA was extracted from protoscoleces and germinal layers and amplified by PCR. Phylogenetic analysis was also performed by analyzing the complete nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) of E. granulosus genotypes from various locations.
RESULTS: Sequencing of the amplified products revealed the presence of G1 as dominant genotype, G3 and Echinococcus canadenesis in one isolate each. Altogether, 9 haplotypes were detected based on cox1 gene. Haplotype 3 was the common variant that found in 58 including 42 cattle and 16 sheep.
CONCLUSION: This study provided knowledge on the identity of E. granulosus cysts collected from sheep and cattle in North Khorasan Province. Furthermore, these results showed the potentials of sheep as a main source of infection to humans, contributing the transmission and maintain of hydatid cyst in this region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox1 gene; Genotypes; Hydatid cyst; Iran; Molecular epidemiology

Year:  2018        PMID: 30697311      PMCID: PMC6348223     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Parasitol        ISSN: 1735-7020            Impact factor:   1.012


Introduction

Cystic echinococcosis (CE), also known as cystic hydatid disease, is a severe zoonotic disease caused by the larval stages of Taeniid cestodes of Echinococcus granulosus senso lato (s.l.). Echinococcus spp. require two mammalian hosts to perpetuate their life cycle. Dog and other canids act as definitive hosts for adult worms, and ungulates serve as intermediate hosts for the cystic larva. Human is accidental intermediate host that become infected through ingestion of parasite eggs excreted by the feces of the infected dogs (1, 2). Despite the major control and prevention programs in reducing hydatid disease, this disease remains as a serious human and animal health concern (3). CE is a cosmopolitan diseases that is endemic in many rural and pastoral areas of Asia (4–6). This disease is known to be endemic in many parts of Iran (7). Furthermore, CE has been reported with different prevalence (5% to 49%) in Iranian dogs (8–10). Human hydatidosis is responsible for about 1% of the surgical operation in Iranian hospitals (7, 11) and the incidence rate of this disease is reported to be 0.6–1.2 cases per 100000 inhabitants (7, 12), indicating high prevalence of CE in Iran. Sheep-dog cycle is mainly present in Iran. Sheep and camel serve as the most important intermediate hosts (88% and 70%, respectively) (7, 13). Recent molecular phylogenic analysis using mitochondrial genetic data have revealed 10 different genotypes for E. granulosus that differ in infectivity, host range and genetic characteristic (14). The following reconstruction based mainly on mitochondrial data of E. granulosus s.l. suggests four major species as follows: E. granulosus sensu stricto (s.s) (G1–G3), E. equinus (G4), E. ortleppi (G5) and E. canadensis (G6– G10) (15). “Camel and cattle strain cycles of E. granulosus require the shorter intervals for chemotherapy of dogs with respect to the shorter pre-patent period of these strains” (16). Therefore, knowledge of Echinococcus species involved in a region have benefits for the development of prevention and control programs and epidemiological studies (17). An extensive body of evidence has indicated the high prevalence of CE in livestock and human in Iran (18). The annual economic loss incurred as a result of hydatid cyst-related condemnation of offal was estimated over U.S$219,349 in North Khorasan, where this study was conducted (19). Furthermore, surgical survey has been found evidence for the presence of human hydatidosis (20), considering the importance of molecular studying for elucidating the parasite epidemiology. This study was conducted to extend the knowledge on molecular characterization of the larval stage of E. granulosus collected from sheep and cattle originating from North Khorasan Province, Iran.

Materials and Methods

Collection of hydatid cysts

Overall, 122 hydatid cysts were collected during 2016–2017 from slaughtered animals (sheep and cattle) during post-mortem inspection from various locations within North Khorasan Province, Iran. Collected cysts from lung and liver were placed in sterile saline solution and transported to the laboratory in ice box. To evaluate the cysts fertility, cyst contents were aseptically aspirated, centrifuged at 1500 gr for 10 min, and examined for the presence of protoscoleces. Protoscoleces were collected from fertile cysts, whereas germinal layers were collected from infertile cysts. Collected protoscoleces and germinal layers were washed several times in sterile saline and saved in −20 until DNA extraction.

DNA extraction and Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted individually from the larval tissues of E. granulosus using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer′s instructions and used as a template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Partial fragment of a mitochondrial gene for cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) was subjected to amplify by PCR using specific primers as described previously (21). PCR reaction was conducted in a 50 μl final volume containing 50–100 ng of gDNA, 200 μM of each dNTP, 3 mM of MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, and 1.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase. The DNA fragment of cox1 was amplified under following cycling condition, initial denaturation step of 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 sec, annealing at 50 °C for 45 sec and extension at 72 °C for 45 sec; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The resulting amplicons from each PCR were analyzed through 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and were visualized by ethidium bromide staining under UV.

DNA sequence analysis

Amplified products were commercially purified and sequenced using the forward primer employed for PCR (Bioneer, South Korea). The quality of the sequences was evaluated and edited by BioEdite software 7.0.5 (22) and then compared to those available in the Gen-Bank database using BLAST sequence algorithms to determine the genotype of Echinococcus isolates (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). All 122 nucleotide sequences obtained in the present study were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KR733081-KR733083-88, KR920697, KR920700-701, KT200218-20, KT200222-23, KT254111-19, KT254121-25, KT320877-88, KU360296-325, KU603673-79, KU603681-707, KU603709-726, and KU603728-729 for cox1 sequences.

Phylogenetic analysis

A phylogenetic analysis based on the haplotype approach was conducted to estimate the similarity/distance of parameters. In brief, previously published sequences of different E. granulosus isolates were used as reference sequences (Table 1). Nucleotide data including reference sequences and haplotypes sequences from this study were aligned with the Clustal W (23) algorithm using BioEdit version 7.0.5 (22). The HKY + gamma + T model was selected as the best fit model using j model test 0.1.1 software (24). The selected model based on the Akaike Information Criterion was applied to construct phylogenetic relationships between the haplotypes using the Maximum likelihood tree as implemented in PAUP 4.0b10 (25). Reliability of internal branches was evaluated using non-parametric bootstrapping with 1000 replicates. Taenia saginata was included as outgroup.
Table 1:

Accession number and geographical locations of Echinococcus cox1 sequences used in the present phylogenetic analysis

GenotypeHostAccession numberCountry
G1CattleHM636639Lybia
G1SheepHQ717149Turkey
G1SheepDQ856467Greece
G1HumanJX854034India
G1SheepHM563001Iran (Kerman)
G1GoatHM563010Iran (Kerman)
G1DogJN604097Iran (Lorestan)
G1SheepJF775380Turkey
G2SheepM84662Tasmania
G2DogJN604103Iran (Lorestan)
G2GoatKJ162562Iran (Kashan)
G3SheepDQ856466Greece
G3IndiaJX854028India
G3SheepHM563016Iran (Kerman)
G3BuffaloM84663India
G3DogJN604104Iran (Lorestan)
G4HorseM84664Spain
G5CamelAB921055Egypt
G5HumanJX854035India
G5CattleAB235846Argentina
G5CattleM84665Holland
G6CamelNC011121Kazakhstan
G6CamelAB921058Egypt
G6CamelAB921084Egypt
G6CamelHM563018Iran (Kerman)
G6CamelM84666kenya
G6HumanKC415063India
G6CamelHM856354Iran
G7HumanKJ556997China
G7PigM84667Poland
G8MooseAB235848USA
G10ReindeerAF525457Filand
G10HumanKJ663947China
G10MooseAB777911Russia
Taenia saginataHumanAB465246South Korea
Accession number and geographical locations of Echinococcus cox1 sequences used in the present phylogenetic analysis

Sequence homology

Haplotype segregation in obtained sequences in the present study was performed by DnaSP software version 5 (26). Multiple alignments of sequence information using Clustal W estimated the extent of variation in detected genotype by pairwise comparison of haplotype sequences with each other and reference sequences. To determine the synonymous and non-synonymous substitution, the nucleotide sequences translated into the corresponding amino acids using CLC genomics software version 9 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark).

Ethical aspects

All samples were collected post-mortem in the slaughterhouse and caused no suffering to the animals.

Results

The examination of organ distribution of CE indicated pulmonary and hepatic cysts in both animals. In cattle, lung was more likely to be infected than liver, 64.55%, and 35.44%, respectively. While liver and lung cysts were equal in sheep (22 vs 21). The fertility rates of hydatid cysts were 78% and 12.22% in sheep and cattle, respectively. Pulmonary cysts had higher fertility than liver cysts in both sheep and cattle. The highest rate of fertility was determined in pulmonary cysts of sheep (80.95%), and the lowest in cattle’s liver (10.3%).

Molecular analysis

All genomic DNA samples derived from individual E. granulosus cysts were subjected to PCR of cox1 gene. Successful PCR amplification of cox1 gene yielded amplification product of 446 base pair. Single bands on agarose gel indicated the specificity of the PCR protocol employed. The obtained consensus haplotype sequences of cox1 were 304 bp. Alignments of the obtained sequences derived from sheep isolates indicated the existence of G1 genotype (sheep strain) in 42 of 43 isolates and E. canadensis in one isolate. Totally, 78 of 79 cattle were infected with G1 (E. granulosus sensu stricto), and the remaining one with G3 (buffalo strain). Phylogenetic analysis of cox1 sequences revealed four main clades including the previously well-known G1–G3 complex, G4, G5 and G6–G10 complex. G5 (E. ortleppi) formed a sister phylogenetic group with G6–G10 complex. G4 was distinct from other E. granolossus genotypes (G1–G3, G5, and G6–G10). Totally from 9 haplotypes detected in cox1 sequences, 8 haplotypes grouped with reference sequences from G1–G3 complex, particularly G1. Haplotype 9 clustered with G6 and G7 genotypes, separating from G10 genotypes. Intra-group genetic variation observed in all main groups. Maximum likelihood analysis of the 9 haplotypes along with reference sequences was shown in Fig. 1. Furthermore, the integration of the phylogenetic tree with geographical information from reference sequences used in this study was represented in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1:

Phylogenetic relationships among obtained haplotypes in this study and reference sequences retracted from NCBI. The phylogenetic tree was constructed on COX1 sequences using the Maximum likelihood algorithm as implemented in PAUP 4.0b10. Taenia saginata served as outgroup. The scale bar represents distance

Fig. 2:

Phylogeography of E. granulosus species. GenGIS software was used to represent a clear view of the relationship between geography and genomic diversity. Each of the four genotypes within E. granulosus is assigned a unique color (G1–G3: orange, G4: black, G5: blue and G6–G10: yellow). A sequence of Taenia saginata as the correspondent outgroup sequence is identical by green color

Phylogenetic relationships among obtained haplotypes in this study and reference sequences retracted from NCBI. The phylogenetic tree was constructed on COX1 sequences using the Maximum likelihood algorithm as implemented in PAUP 4.0b10. Taenia saginata served as outgroup. The scale bar represents distance Phylogeography of E. granulosus species. GenGIS software was used to represent a clear view of the relationship between geography and genomic diversity. Each of the four genotypes within E. granulosus is assigned a unique color (G1–G3: orange, G4: black, G5: blue and G6–G10: yellow). A sequence of Taenia saginata as the correspondent outgroup sequence is identical by green color

Sequence polymorphism in COX1 gene

The alignment of the cox1 sequences indicated 9 different haplotypes (including 7 G1s, one G1–3, and one E. canadensis). Among all 9 haplotypes, haplotype 3 was the common variant, found in 58 isolates including 42 cattle and 16 sheep. Haplotype 1 was the second current variant with 42 isolates including 17 sheep and 25 cattle. The other haplotypes (7 haplotypes) observed in 22 isolates (Table 2).
Table 2:

Accession number for the partial cox 1 sequences derived from this study

Haplotype (Genotype)Host origin (number)Accession numbers
Haplotype 1 (G1)Sheep (17), Cattle (25)KU603689KU603713KU360312KU603718KU603717KU603716
KU603703KU603711KU603678KU603712KU360301KU603723
KT320879KT254121KT254117KT320881KT320882KT254111
KU360298KU360302KU360296KT254114KT254125KU603679
KU603673KT200220KT254116KU603675KU360308KU603685
KU603719KU603707KU603726KT320888KU603725KU603722
KR920697 KU603715 KU603721 KT320883 KT320884 KT320887
Haplotype 2 (G1)Sheep (1), cattle (4)KU360316 KU603709 KU603693 KU603728 KT320877
Haplotype 3 (G1)Sheep (16), Cattle (42)KU360297KU360304KU603681KR733081KU360323KU603700
KU360306KU360300KU360319KU603683KU360324KU603677
KU360303KU603701KU360322KR733088KT254123KU603692
KU603704KU603699KU360307KU360314KU360310KU603684
KU603691KU603688KU360311KU603682KU603714KU603729
KT320880KT320878KU603710KU603686KU603690KU603698
KT254122KR920700KU360320KT254119KU603697KU360321
KT254124KU603706KT254113KU603705KU360305KU360313
KU603674KU360325KU603702KT200219KU603687KT254118
KU360309 KU360315 KT200218 KT200223
Haplotype 4 (G1)Sheep (1), cattle (2)KT200222 KT254112 KT254115
Haplotype 5 (G3)Cattle (1)KR733086
Haplotype 6 (G1)Sheep (4), cattle (3)KU360299KU603676KU603695KU603696KU360318KR920701
KT320885
Haplotype 7 (G1)Sheep (1), cattle (2)KT320886 KU603720 KU603724
Haplotype 8 (G1)Sheep (2)KU603694 KU360317
Haplotype 9 (G6)Sheep (1)KR733084
Accession number for the partial cox 1 sequences derived from this study The alignment of the cox1 sequence indicated intra-genotype sequence variation within G1 and G6 genotypes (Fig. 3). Haplotype 1 showed complete identify (100%) to G1 reference sequence (HM563001). Haplotype 2 had a single nucleotide substitution of C to T at position 105 as compared to reference sequence HM563001, but this substitution was synonymous. Synonymous substitution was also observed in haplotype 6 with a transition of C to T at position 13. Haplotype 3 showed a nucleotide change of C to T at position 3, leading to non-synonymous substation of Alanine to Valine. Two variable non-synonymous substitutions were observed in haplotype 4, one substitution (C to T) at position 3 led to substitution of Alanine to Valine and the other (A to G) at position 134, causing transition of Isoleucine to Valine. Comparison of G1 reference sequence (HM563001) and haplotype 5 showed two differences.
Fig. 3:

ClustalW alignments of partial cox1 amino acid sequences. Accession numbers HM563001, M84662, M84663, M84666, and M84667 represent G1, G2, G3, G6 and G7 reference sequences, respectively

ClustalW alignments of partial cox1 amino acid sequences. Accession numbers HM563001, M84662, M84663, M84666, and M84667 represent G1, G2, G3, G6 and G7 reference sequences, respectively One substitution at the 204 positions (T to C), leading to substitution of Valine to Alanine and the other at the 13 positions, causing non-synonymous substitution. On the other hand, this haplotype generated a sequence with 100% identify to G3 reference sequence (M84663). Haplotype 7 had the most sequence variation with one synonymous (C to T at position 13) and two non-synonymous substitutions. Nucleotide substitution (G to A) at position 295 changed Aspartate to Asparagine. Substitution of Alanine to Valine was generated by transition of C to T at position 3. Haplotype 8 had also both non-synonymous and synonymous substation at position 3 and 13, respectively. Haplotype 9 showed 99% identify to G6 and G7 reference sequences (M84666) with a single transition (C to T) at position 204, leading non-synonymous substitution (Alanine to Valine).

Discussion

In the present study, three genotypes were identified to infect cattle and sheep: G1, G3 and E. canadensis. G1 was found as the most common genotype in North Khorasan Province, consistent with the earlier study from Iran (27, 28). The presence of G1 was found in all thirty liver and lung samples from cattle, sheep, and goats of abattoirs in northern and western Iran using DNA sequences of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene (29). A predominance of G1 with a small number of G3 using cox1 gene was showed in five different provinces of Iran (30). In contrast, a study on 19 camel hydatid cysts collected from central Iran revealed the majority of G3 genotype in isolates (31). The dominant of G1 over the other genotypes was also reported from other countries: such as China (32), Turkey (33) and Southern Brazil (34). The occurrence of both sheep strain (G1) and buffalo strain (G3) have been demonstrated in different intermediated host in Iran (35, 36) and other countries (34, 37). For example, the presence of G3 genotype was found in 3 cattle and 2 sheep along with the majority of G1 in both animals (107 isolates) (38). A similar finding was reported in Italy on 80 cattle and water buffalos (78.75% G1 vs. 12.5% G3) (39). In contrast, G3 and G6 were the dominant genotypes in India (40, 41) and Egypt (42, 43), respectively. Considering that sheep strain (G1) was the most frequent genotype, it seems to sheep-dog cycle was responsible for establishment and maintenance of Echinococcus life cycle in North Khorasan Province where this study was conducted. However, G3 and G6 genotypes are known human pathogens and should be considered as a significant public health concern. In the present study 9 haplotypes were identified based on the alignment of Cox1 sequences. In comparison with our result, haplotype segregation of previous studies from other provinces in Iran showed a higher diversity of E. granulosus sensu stricto (G1–G3). For example studies in Ardabil (44), Lorestan (8) and Zanjan province described 13 haplotypes (35). This difference may be related to the length of the gene analyzed, province of study and sample size. The outcomes of haplotype segregation could be affected by the length of the gene analyzed (45). In this study, the topology of Echinococcus clade from this tree was consistent with previous studies (46–48). The present phylogeny based on maximum likelihood supported the validity of the G1–G3 complex to distinct from other genotypes and withhold that G2 was a distinct genotype. Moreover, the tree showed a monophyly of E. ortleppi and E. canadensis and supported the nation that E. canadensis are closely related to each other. The tree topology suggested that G10 and G8 were paraphyletic and G10 was sister to G6 and G7. Our results provided supportive evidence for the revision of genotype G4 into E. equinus (17). In our phylogenetic tree haplotypes, 1–8 grouped with published sequences representing genotypes G1–G3. Haplotype 9 placed in a close genetic relatedness of G6 and G7. Considering that G6 and G7 are descendants of a common ancestor (47) and based on our phylogenetic analysis, the name of E. canadensis seems to be the most suitable for haplotype 9. The alignment of haplotype 9 along with G6 (M84666) and G7 reference sequences (M84667) was also showed 99% identify to both sequences, supporting phylogenetic results. Haplotype 5 grouped into G1–G3 complex with the most close related to G3 genotype.

Conclusion

The Echinococcus genotypes identified in this study, G1, G3, and G6, are known human pathogen, exerting significant public health concern. Molecular analysis showed the presence of G1 (sheep strain) as the prominent genotype of Echinococcus in sheep and cattle in North Khorasan Province of Iran. Considering the presence of poor rural communities where people and livestock are in close contact to dog, prevention and control program should be imposed on sheep – dog cycle. Although cattle were found to be infected with G1, they did not contribute to the transmission of the disease because most of the cysts were sterile. Although this study has provided a glimpse of the genotypes of E. granulosus in North Khorasan Province, a large study is needed to investigate the isolate from different hosts and from multiple geographic areas to better understand the transmission and epidemiology of different genotypes in Iran.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Present situation of cystic echinococcosis in Central Asia.

Authors:  Paul R Torgerson; B Oguljahan; Abdoullo E Muminov; Roza R Karaeva; Omurbek T Kuttubaev; Mirabbas Aminjanov; Blok Shaikenov
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in western Iran.

Authors:  A Dalimi; Gh Motamedi; M Hosseini; B Mohammadian; H Malaki; Z Ghamari; F Ghaffari Far
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Genotyping of human cystic echinococcosis in Xinjiang, PR China.

Authors:  J M Bart; M Abdukader; Y L Zhang; R Y Lin; Y H Wang; M Nakao; A Ito; P S Craig; R Piarroux; D A Vuitton; H Wen
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Present situation of echinococcosis in the Middle East and Arabic North Africa.

Authors:  Seyed Mahmoud Sadjjadi
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 5.  Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus Echinococcus.

Authors:  R C Andrew Thompson; Donald P McManus
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2002-10

6.  A molecular phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  M Nakao; D P McManus; P M Schantz; P S Craig; A Ito
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Genetic variation within and between G1 and G3 genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus in Italy revealed by multilocus DNA sequencing.

Authors:  M Busi; V Snábel; A Varcasia; G Garippa; V Perrone; C De Liberato; S D'Amelio
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 8.  Echinococcosis--an international public health challenge.

Authors:  P R Torgerson; C M Budke
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.534

9.  Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing.

Authors:  J Bowles; D Blair; D P McManus
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis.

Authors:  Christine M Budke; Peter Deplazes; Paul R Torgerson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Molecular Characterization and Phylogeny of Taenia hydatigena and Echinococcus granulosus from Iranian Sheep and Cattle Based on COX1 Gene.

Authors:  Vahid Raissi; Soudabeh Etemadi; Nasrin Sohrabi; Omid Raiesi; Mehdi Shahraki; Alireza Salimi-Khorashad; Asmaa Ibrahim
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.188

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.