| Literature DB >> 30697120 |
Yuki Sakai1, Liangzi Cao1,2,3, Ryosuke Funata1, Takatou Shiraishi1, Koki Yoshikawa1, Kohei Maeno1, Hideho Miura1, Kazumitsu Onishi1.
Abstract
Spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp. spelta), a subspecies of common wheat, is a genetic resource for the breeding of bread wheat (T. aestivum subsp. aestivum); however, genetic analyses of agronomic traits in bread wheat × spelt crosses are insufficient. Here, we conducted QTL analysis in the recombinant inbred lines from a bread wheat × spelt cross. In addition to the major Q locus, QSpd.obu-4D was detected with the spelt allele conferring a higher spikelet density than the bread wheat allele. The effect of QSpd.obu-4D was evident in the presence of the Q allele of bread wheat, suggesting that this variation might be cryptic in spelt wheat with the q allele. Two QTLs with stable effects were identified for grain length, one of which (QGl.obu-1A) has never been detected in a bread wheat × spelt cross. The spelt wheat allele at QHt.obu-7B conferring later heading was identified in the Vrn-B3 region and could be a novel gene source for modifying heading time. Furthermore, QGi.obu-2B, responsible for low grain dormancy of spelt wheat, was detected. Further exploration and identification of useful QTLs could accelerate the utilization of spelt wheat as a genetic resource for bread wheat breeding programs.Entities:
Keywords: QTL analysis; grain dormancy; grain morphology; heading time; spelt wheat; spike morphology
Year: 2018 PMID: 30697120 PMCID: PMC6345227 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.18046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Comparison of spike and grain related traits in parental strains and RILs
| Trait | Trial | CS | RU | RILs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Mean | Range | |||||
| SPL (cm) | 2014 | 7.3 | 13.8 | 9.3 | 4.1–14.8 | |
| 2015 | 8.0 | 13.9 | 9.4 | 4.8–14.1 | ||
| 2016 | 6.9 | 13.1 | 9.5 | 4.7–14.5 | ||
| SPN | 2014 | 18.1 | 18.6 | ns | 17.1 | 12.3–22.3 |
| 2015 | 20.5 | 18.4 | 19.0 | 15.0–24.8 | ||
| 2016 | 18.3 | 17.0 | 17.5 | 13.5–21.0 | ||
| SPD (spikelets/cm) | 2014 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.1–3.5 | |
| 2015 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.3–4.2 | ||
| 2016 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.0–3.6 | ||
| GL (mm) | 2014 | 5.7 | 7.7 | 6.6 | 5.6–7.6 | |
| 2015 | 5.7 | 7.6 | 6.7 | 5.4–7.8 | ||
| 2016 | 6.1 | 7.8 | 7.1 | 5.9–8.3 | ||
| GW (mm) | 2014 | 3.0 | 3.0 | ns | 3.0 | 2.4–3.2 |
| 2015 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.6–3.3 | ||
| 2016 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.7–3.4 | ||
| GT (mm) | 2014 | 2.6 | 2.6 | ns | 2.7 | 2.3–3.0 |
| 2015 | 2.5 | 2.7 | ns | 2.7 | 2.3–3.2 | |
| 2016 | 2.9 | 2.9 | ns | 3.0 | 2.5–3.5 | |
| HT (days) | 2014 | 63.7 | 65.5 | 68.8 | 61.3–86.0 | |
| 2015 | 61.8 | 60.5 | ns | 65.7 | 55.5–82.5 | |
| 2016 | 73.4 | 82.3 | 81.7 | 74.0–92.0 | ||
| GI | 2014 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.04–1.00 | |
| 2015 | 0.37 | 0.94 | 0.51 | 0.00–1.00 | ||
GL: Grain length, GW: Grain width, GT: Grain thickness, SPL: Spike length, SPN: Spikelet numbers per spike, SPD: Spikelet density (SPN/SPL), HT: Heading time, GI: Germination index.
indicate that the significance at the 5, 1 and 0.1% levels respectively. ns indicates non-significance.
Fig. 1Variation in spike (A) and grain (B) morphologies observed in the parental strains and RILs.
Fig. 2Linkage map indicating the positions of QTLs detected in the RILs. Markers used for map construction are shown on the left side of the chromosomes. Locations of QTLs detected by MQM mapping are represented as boxes with two-LOD support intervals. Filled and white boxes indicate the effects of the QTLs that increase the trait values by the RU- and CS-derived alleles, respectively. a, b, and c indicate QTLs detected in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively.
Results of MQM mapping for spike and grain related traits in the RILs
| Trait | Trial | Chromosome | QTL | LOD | PVE (%) | Additive effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPL | 2015 | 4D | 3.5 | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
| 2014 | 5A | 20.5 | 63.8 | −2.3 | ||
| 2015 | 5A | 21.9 | 63.8 | −2.1 | ||
| 2016 | 5A | 29.7 | 75.9 | −2.6 | ||
| SPN | 2014 | 5A | 5.3 | 23.0 | 0.9 | |
| SPD | 2014 | 4D | 4.6 | 7.6 | −0.2 | |
| 2015 | 4D | 4.9 | 9.2 | −0.2 | ||
| 2016 | 4D | 3.3 | 5.3 | −0.2 | ||
| 2014 | 5A | 22.0 | 56.0 | 0.6 | ||
| 2015 | 5A | 18.0 | 50.1 | 0.5 | ||
| 2016 | 5A | 21.4 | 56.0 | 0.5 | ||
| GL | 2014 | 1A | 2.9 | 9.9 | −0.1 | |
| 2015 | 1A | 3.1 | 6.7 | −0.1 | ||
| 2016 | 1A | 4.4 | 16.2 | −0.2 | ||
| 2014 | 2D | 5.4 | 19.3 | −0.2 | ||
| 2015 | 2D | 5.0 | 11.3 | −0.2 | ||
| 2016 | 2D | 2.9 | 10.3 | −0.2 | ||
| 2015 | 3A | 3.5 | 7.7 | 0.1 | ||
| 2015 | 4D | 3.9 | 8.5 | 0.1 | ||
| GW | 2016 | 2B | 5.9 | 24.7 | 0.1 | |
| 2014 | 5A | 3.0 | 13.7 | −0.1 | ||
| 2015 | 5A | 4.6 | 20.1 | −0.1 | ||
| GT | 2014 | 5A | 5.4 | 23.4 | 0.1 | |
| 2015 | 5A | 8.4 | 33.3 | 0.1 | ||
| 2016 | 5A | 7.8 | 31.0 | 0.1 | ||
| HT | 2016 | 2B | 6.7 | 25.3 | −2.0 | |
| 2014 | 5A | 10.5 | 37.9 | 3.5 | ||
| 2015 | 5A | 17.3 | 54.6 | 5.6 | ||
| 2014 | 7B | 4.0 | 12.7 | −2.2 | ||
| 2015 | 7B | 4.5 | 9.9 | −2.7 | ||
| 2016 | 7B | 3.8 | 12.6 | −1.8 | ||
| GI | 2014 | 2B | 3.1 | 14.6 | −0.10 | |
| 2015 | 2B | 3.8 | 19.4 | −0.12 |
LOD values, PVE (phenotypic variance explained by each QTL), and additive effect are listed. Positive and negative values of additive effect indicate the effect increasing trait values by the CS and RU alleles, respectively.
Fig. 3Interaction of two QTLs for spikelet density on chromosomes 5A (the Q locus) and 4D (QSpd.obu-4D). Two markers (wmc720 and ALMT-1) or three markers (barc319, Q, and Vrn-A1) were used to determine the genotype of QTL on chromosomes 4D and 5A, respectively. Different letters on the bars indicate significant differences between genotypes in the same experiment. *: Six lines were used in 2015.
Fig. 4Comparative maps of QTL locations on chromosomes 2D (A) and 4D (B). The linkage map in this study and the framework map based on Somers are shown on the left and right, respectively. QTLs detected in this study are shown on the left linkage map, as boxes with two-LOD support intervals. The locations of reported QTLs or genes are shown on the right linkage map. a) Bars represent the regions including the LOD peaks of QTLs reported by Manickavelu . b) The location of Tg-D1 was reported by Dvorak . The location of ALMT-1 was reported by Ma .
Fig. 5Comparative maps of QTL locations for grain dormancy or PHS tolerance on chromosome 2B. The linkage map in this study and the framework map based on Somers are shown on the left and right, respectively. QTLs detected in this study are shown on the left linkage map as boxes with two-LOD support intervals. The locations of the reported QTLs are shown on the right linkage map. Bars represent the regions including the LOD peaks of QTLs reported by a) and b) Chao ; c) Kumar ; d) Kulwal ; e) Liu ; f) Mohan ; g) Singh ; h) Somyong ; i) Kumar ; and j) Zhang . The location of Ppd-B1 was reported by Nguyen .