| Literature DB >> 30696857 |
Koji Yamada1,2, Tomoaki Nitta1, Kohei Atsuji1,2, Maeka Shiroyama3, Komaki Inoue4, Chieko Higuchi1, Nobuko Nitta1, Satoshi Oshiro3,5, Keiichi Mochida2,4,6,7, Osamu Iwata1,2, Iwao Ohtsu1,3, Kengo Suzuki8,9.
Abstract
Euglena gracilis is a microalga, which has been used as a model organism for decades. Recent technological advances have enabled mass cultivation of this species for industrial applications such as feedstock in nutritional foods and cosmetics. E. gracilis degrades its storage polysaccharide (paramylon) under hypoxic conditions for energy acquisition by an oxygen-independent process and accumulates high amount of wax-ester as a by-product. Using this sequence of reactions referred to as wax-ester fermentation, E. gracilis is studied for its application in biofuel production. Although the wax-ester production pathway is well characterized, little is known regarding the biochemical reactions underlying the main metabolic route, especially, the existence of an unknown sulfur-compound metabolism implied by the nasty odor generation accompanying the wax-ester fermentation. In this study, we show sulfur-metabolomics of E. gracilis in aerobic and hypoxic conditions, to reveal the biochemical reactions that occur during wax-ester synthesis. Our results helped us in identifying hydrogen sulfide (H2S) as the nasty odor-producing component in wax-ester fermentation. In addition, the results indicate that glutathione and protein degrades during hypoxia, whereas cysteine, methionine, and their metabolites increase in the cells. This indicates that this shift of abundance in sulfur compounds is the cause of H2S synthesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30696857 PMCID: PMC6351624 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36600-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Upregulation of sulfide in hypoxia. (A) Upregulated extracellular sulfur-containing compounds in hypoxia. Eleven sulfur-containing compounds were identified as compounds upregulated in hypoxia. The data for both aerobic condition and hypoxia are derived from the cell supernatant in phosphate buffer medium. “Bimane modified” indicates the compounds detected as bimane-modified compounds. Procedure defined unit is calculated by normalizing the LC/MS signals to that of aerobic conditions for each compound. Error bars indicate SD. N.D. indicates that the compound was not detected in the condition. n = 3, *p < 0.05 t-test, **p < 0.05 t-test with Bonferroni’s correction, †compounds were not detected in aerobic condition. (B,C). Detailed quantification of sulfide in cell pellet (B) and supernatant (C) for each condition is shown at the bottom of the graphs. Procedure defined unit is calculated by normalizing the LC/MS signals by that of the aerobic condition for each graph. Error bars indicate SD. n = 3, a, b, c: means with the different character indicates significant difference, p < 0.05 Tukey’s multiple test.
Figure 2Decrease of total glutathione in hypoxia. (A) Relative quantification of glutathione (GSH)-related compounds in the cells in aerobic condition and hypoxia. The detected GSH compounds are reduced GSH, its oxidized form synthesized by covalent disulfide bond between two GSH molecules (GSSG), and their persulfidated derivatives GS-SH, GS-S2H, GS-S-SG, and GS-S2-SG. Procedure defined unit is calculated by normalizing the LC/MS signals to that of aerobic conditions for each compound. Error bars indicate SD. n = 3, *p < 0.05 t-test, **p < 0.05 t-test with Bonferroni’s correction. (B) An illustration of the reduction and oxidization network of glutathione. Red and blue arrows indicate the alteration in redox state of the compounds. The superscript for each compound indicates its upregulation (UP) or downregulation (DOWN) with or without a mark indicating the significant difference (*p < 0.05 t-test, **p < 0.05 t-test with Bonferroni’s correction).
Figure 3Increased and decreased sulfur compounds in hypoxia. (A,B) Relative quantification of increased (A) and decreased (B) sulfur-containing compounds in the cells in aerobic conditions and hypoxia. Procedure defined unit is calculated by normalizing the LC/MS signals to that of aerobic condition for each compound. Error bars indicate SD. N.D. indicates that the compound is not detected in the condition. n = 3, *p < 0.05 t-test, **p < 0.05 t-test with Bonferroni’s correction, †compounds are not detected in either of the conditions. (C) An illustration of the metabolic network of sulfur compounds. The arrows between compounds indicate metabolic reactions. The superscript for each compound indicates the upregulation (UP) or downregulation (DOWN) of the compound with or without a mark indicating the significant difference (*p < 0.05 t-test, **p < 0.05 t-test with Bonferroni’s correction, †compounds are not detected in either of condition). (D) Quantification of protein in the cells in aerobic conditions and hypoxia. Error bars indicate SD. n = 3, *p < 0.05 t-test.