Literature DB >> 30694967

Suggestions for Professional Mixed Martial Arts Training With Pacing Strategy and Technical-Tactical Actions by Rounds.

Naiara Ribeiro Antoniettô1, Fabio Dal Bello2, Andreia C Carrenho Queiroz1, Pedro H Berbert de Carvalho1, Ciro J Brito1, John Amtmann3, Bianca Miarka1,4.   

Abstract

Antoniettô, NR, Bello, FD, Carrenho Queiroz, AC, Berbert de Carvalho, PH, Brito, CJ, Amtmann, J, and Miarka, B. Suggestions for professional mixed martial arts training with pacing strategy and technical-tactical actions by rounds. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2019-This study compared the pacing strategy and motor actions used in mixed martial arts combats ending by knockout/technical knockout (KO/TKO) or submission. All of the sample bouts ended in KO/TKO and consisted of 1,564 rounds of 678 bouts. The bouts were separated by round (R) of bouts ending (ER) in the first round (n = 192), first (1R × 2ER) and second (2R × 2ER) of bouts ending in the second round (n = 172), and first (1R × 3ER), second (2R × 3ER), and third (3R × 3ER) of bouts ending in the third round (n = 1,200). The analyses were performed according to the duration ([INCREMENT]) in each phase: [INCREMENT] standing preparatory activity time, [INCREMENT] standing combat activity time, [INCREMENT] ground preparatory activity time, and [INCREMENT] ground combat activity time and their technical-tactical actions (attempted and landed strikes to the head, body and leg, takedowns, and submissions). The main results demonstrated a shorter [INCREMENT] standing preparatory activity time in 1R × 1ER (95.6 ± 62.9 seconds) and 2R × 2ER (93.6 ± 67.9 seconds) vs. 2R × 3ER (160.5 ± 87.4 seconds) and 3R × 3ER (144.0 ± 88.5 seconds) with fewer strikes attempted and landed to the head, body, and legs (p ≤ 0.05). No differences were observed (p > 0.05) between [INCREMENT] standing combat activity time, but lower attempted and landed takedowns and strikes to the head, body, and leg frequencies. There were shorter [INCREMENT] ground combat activity time (p ≤ 0.05) in 1R × 1ER (23.4 ± 45.5) and 2R × 2ER (25.3 ± 41.9) vs. 2R × 3ER (50.4 ± 69.9) and 3R × 3ER (52.9 ± 74.2), with lower attempted submissions, chokes, and attempted and landed strikes to the head, body, and leg frequencies observed. These results contribute to the information developed from current research to help improve the quality of training and promote effective athletic preparation related to pacing strategy and performance models.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694967     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Comparisons of Pacing Strategy and Technical-Tactical Behaviors in Female Mixed Martial Arts Rounds.

Authors:  Bianca Miarka; Gustavo Nascimento de Carvalho; Diego Ignácio Valenzuela Pérez; Esteban Aedo-Muñoz; Ciro José Brito
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 2.  Exploratory Systematic Review of Mixed Martial Arts: An Overview of Performance of Importance Factors with over 20,000 Athletes.

Authors:  João C A Bueno; Heloiana Faro; Seth Lenetsky; Aleksandro F Gonçalves; Stefane B C D Dias; André L B Ribeiro; Bruno V C da Silva; Carlos A Cardoso Filho; Bruna M de Vasconcelos; Júlio C Serrão; Alexandro Andrade; Tácito P Souza-Junior; João G Claudino
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Concussion vs. resignation by submission: Technical-tactical behavior analysis considering injury in mixed martial arts.

Authors:  Bianca Miarka; Dany A Sobarzo Soto; Esteban A Aedo-Muñoz; Clóvis A Maurício; Vanessa T Müller; Nicola L Bragazzi; Ciro José Brito
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Ultimate Full Contact: Fight Outcome Characterization Concerning Their Methods, Occurrence Times and Technical-Tactical Developments.

Authors:  Fernando C Loio Pinto; Henrique Neiva; Célia Nunes; Mário C Marques; António C Sousa; Daniel A Marinho; Luís Branquinho; Ricardo Ferraz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.