David S Kauvar1, Michael A Dubick2, Matthew J Martin3. 1. Vascular Surgery Service, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: davekauvar@gmail.com. 2. United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to review and summarize the large animal data on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for traumatic hemorrhage and identify knowledge gaps pertinent to the proposed broader use of the technique in prehospital situations. METHODS: A review of published large animal models of traumatic hemorrhage incorporating REBOA with a primary outcome of the effect of aortic occlusion was performed. Data were collected on experimental protocols, hemodynamic effects, resuscitation requirements, mortality, metabolic and tissue consequences of induced ischemia-reperfusion, and effects on hemorrhage volume and other injuries. RESULTS: A limited number of REBOA studies exist, and there is variability in the species and size of animals used. Various controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage protocols have been studied, and a number of balloon devices used. Hemodynamic effects of occlusion were consistent as were basic systemic physiological effects. Minimal study of the effects of partial aortic occlusion and hemodynamic and metabolic physiology distal to the balloon has been performed, and partial or complete occlusion times >90 min have not been studied. CONCLUSIONS: Significant knowledge gaps exist, which are potentially relevant to the expanded use of REBOA. Investigation into the physiology of partial occlusion and the metabolic effects and potential mitigation strategies for large-scale ischemia and reperfusion are particularly needed. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to review and summarize the large animal data on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for traumatic hemorrhage and identify knowledge gaps pertinent to the proposed broader use of the technique in prehospital situations. METHODS: A review of published large animal models of traumatic hemorrhage incorporating REBOA with a primary outcome of the effect of aortic occlusion was performed. Data were collected on experimental protocols, hemodynamic effects, resuscitation requirements, mortality, metabolic and tissue consequences of induced ischemia-reperfusion, and effects on hemorrhage volume and other injuries. RESULTS: A limited number of REBOA studies exist, and there is variability in the species and size of animals used. Various controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage protocols have been studied, and a number of balloon devices used. Hemodynamic effects of occlusion were consistent as were basic systemic physiological effects. Minimal study of the effects of partial aortic occlusion and hemodynamic and metabolic physiology distal to the balloon has been performed, and partial or complete occlusion times >90 min have not been studied. CONCLUSIONS: Significant knowledge gaps exist, which are potentially relevant to the expanded use of REBOA. Investigation into the physiology of partial occlusion and the metabolic effects and potential mitigation strategies for large-scale ischemia and reperfusion are particularly needed. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hemorrhage; REBOA; Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta; Translational research; Trauma
Authors: Nori L Bradley; W Robert Leeper; Derek Roberts; Chad G Ball; Andrew Beckett; Paul Engels; Emilie Joos; Kosar Khwaja; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Jacinthe Lampron; Sam Minor; Neil Parry; Joao Neto Rezende; Sandy Widder; Najma Ahmed; Lawrence Gillman; David Gomez; Morad Hameed; Michael Kim; Patrick Murphy; Rahima Nenshi; Timothy Rice; Kelly Vogt Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Sascha Halvachizadeh; Ladislav Mica; Yannik Kalbas; Miriam Lipiski; Marko Canic; Michel Teuben; Nikola Cesarovic; Zoran Rancic; Paolo Cinelli; Valentin Neuhaus; Hans- Christoph Pape; Roman Pfeifer Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Marianne A Thrailkill; Kevin H Gladin; Catherine R Thorpe; Teryn R Roberts; Jae H Choi; Kevin K Chung; Corina N Necsoiu; Todd E Rasmussen; Leopoldo C Cancio; Andriy I Batchinsky Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Yaset Caicedo; Linda M Gallego; Hugo Jc Clavijo; Natalia Padilla-Londoño; Cindy-Natalia Gallego; Isabella Caicedo-Holguín; Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez; Juan J Meléndez-Lugo; Alberto F García; Alexander E Salcedo; Michael W Parra; Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín; Carlos A Ordoñez Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2022-10-17 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Guillaume L Hoareau; Carl A Beyer; Connor A Caples; Marguerite W Spruce; J Kevin Grayson; Lucas P Neff; Timothy K Williams; M Austin Johnson Journal: Mil Med Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Eileen M Bulger; Debra G Perina; Zaffer Qasim; Brian Beldowicz; Megan Brenner; Frances Guyette; Dennis Rowe; Christopher Scott Kang; Jennifer Gurney; Joseph DuBose; Bellal Joseph; Regan Lyon; Krista Kaups; Vidor E Friedman; Brian Eastridge; Ronald Stewart Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2019-09-20
Authors: Yansong Li; Michael A Dubick; Zhangsheng Yang; Johnny L Barr; Brandon J Gremmer; Michael L Lucas; Corina Necsoiu; Bryan S Jordan; Andriy I Batchinsky; Leopoldo C Cancio Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 3.240