Literature DB >> 30694735

In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid in Comparison with Other Oral and Intravenous Agents Against a Collection of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (2014-2015) in the United States.

Michael A Pfaller1, Helio S Sader1, Paul R Rhomberg1, Robert K Flamm1, Rodrigo E Mendes1.   

Abstract

Tedizolid activity was compared with other agents with oral and intravenous formulations against community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Tedizolid (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.12 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible) was the most potent agent tested against CA-MRSA and subsets from adult and pediatric patients. Tedizolid minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were twofold to fourfold lower than daptomycin (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L; 99.9-100% susceptible) and fourfold to eightfold lower than linezolid (MIC50/90, 1/1 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible), ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.5-1/1 mg/L; 96.6-98.8% susceptible), and vancomycin (MIC50/90, 0.5-1/1 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible) against CA-MRSA and subsets. Clindamycin resistance rates among CA-MRSA from pediatric and adult patients were 18.3-19.1% (13.4-14.2% constitutive, 4.9-6.4% inducible) and 36.2-37.6% (29.8-30.1% constitutive, 6.4-7.5% inducible), respectively. Tetracycline (90.4-96.4% susceptible) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (96.2-100.0% susceptible) were active against CA-MRSA or subsets, whereas erythromycin (83.8-89.4% nonsusceptible) and levofloxacin (50.2-70.8% nonsusceptible) had limited activities. Tedizolid had MIC50/90 values of 0.12/0.12 mg/L against CA-MRSA showing clindamycin constitutive-resistance and recovered from adult or pediatric patients. Tedizolid had potent activities against CA-MRSA, regardless of clindamycin phenotype or patient population. Tedizolid may be considered for the treatment of ABSSSI in adults. Further studies are warranted for the clinical development in the pediatric population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA-MRSA; Sivextro; clindamycin; oxazolidinone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694735     DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Drug Resist        ISSN: 1076-6294            Impact factor:   3.431


  4 in total

1.  Tedizolid Versus Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shao-Huan Lan; Wei-Ting Lin; Shen-Peng Chang; Li-Chin Lu; Chien-Ming Chao; Chih-Cheng Lai; Jui-Hsiang Wang
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tedizolid.

Authors:  Khalid Iqbal; Aliki Milioudi; Sebastian Georg Wicha
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Sajad Rajabi; Chunhua Shi; Ghazale Afifirad; Nazanin Omidi; Ebrahim Kouhsari; Saeed Khoshnood; Khalil Azizian
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.781

4.  Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains from the endotracheal tubes of patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  Roberto Cabrera; Laia Fernández-Barat; Anna Motos; Rubén López-Aladid; Nil Vázquez; Mauro Panigada; Francisco Álvarez-Lerma; Yuly López; Laura Muñoz; Pedro Castro; Jordi Vila; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.887

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.