| Literature DB >> 30694562 |
Shuai Li1,2, Pierre-Antoine Dugué1,3,4, Laura Baglietto5, Gianluca Severi1,3,6, Ee Ming Wong4,7, Tuong L Nguyen1, Jennifer Stone8, Dallas R English1,3, Melissa C Southey4,7, Graham G Giles1,3, John L Hopper1,3, Roger L Milne1,3,4.
Abstract
Age- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted mammographic density is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. DNA methylation is a molecular mechanism that could underlie inter-individual variation in mammographic density. We aimed to investigate the association between breast cancer risk-predicting mammographic density measures and blood DNA methylation. For 436 women from the Australian Mammographic Density Twins and Sisters Study and 591 women from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, mammographic density (dense area, nondense area and percentage dense area) defined by the conventional brightness threshold was measured using the CUMULUS software, and peripheral blood DNA methylation was measured using the HumanMethylation450 (HM450) BeadChip assay. Associations between DNA methylation at >400,000 sites and mammographic density measures adjusted for age and BMI were assessed within each cohort and pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis. Associations with methylation at genetic loci known to be associated with mammographic density were also examined. We found no genome-wide significant (p < 10-7 ) association for any mammographic density measure from the meta-analysis, or from the cohort-specific analyses. None of the 299 methylation sites located at genetic loci associated with mammographic density was associated with any mammographic density measure after adjusting for multiple testing (all p > 0.05/299 = 1.7 × 10-4 ). In summary, our study did not find evidence for associations between blood DNA methylation, as measured by the HM450 assay, and conventional mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; breast cancer; epigenetics; mammographic density
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30694562 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cancer ISSN: 0020-7136 Impact factor: 7.396