Literature DB >> 30694440

The Phenomenology of Lying in Young Adults and Relationships with Personality and Cognition.

Jon E Grant1, Helen A Paglia2, Samuel R Chamberlain3,4.   

Abstract

Despite research suggesting that lying may be a normal aspect of development and a fairly frequent occurrence in many adults, surprisingly little is known about its phenomenology and possible associations with relevant personality traits and cognitive functions. University students were invited to participate in an online study, which included a 91-item questionnaire and four neurocognitive tasks (selected to focus on frontal lobe function). The survey included questions about frequency of lying and reasons for doing so, mental health history, personality traits, religiosity, and insight into lying. Those who lied daily ("Daily Liars") were compared to those who lied less frequently ("Non-Daily Liars"). 18.1% of the sample reported lying every day. Daily Liars showed worse grade point averages, quality of life, and self-esteem. Daily Lying was associated with negative functional impact on school, social, and family/home domains. We did not find evidence that is was associated with frontal lobe dysfunction on the cognitive tasks examined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impulsivity; Lying; Personality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694440      PMCID: PMC6542652          DOI: 10.1007/s11126-018-9623-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  16 in total

1.  A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function.

Authors:  A B Morgan; S O Lilienfeld
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-01

2.  Pathological lying associated with thalamic dysfunction demonstrated by [99mTc]HMPAO SPECT.

Authors:  J G Modell; J M Mountz; C V Ford
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.198

3.  Neural systems engaged by planning: a PET study of the Tower of London task.

Authors:  S C Baker; R D Rogers; A M Owen; C D Frith; R J Dolan; R S Frackowiak; T W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.

Authors:  Kristina Suchotzki; Bruno Verschuere; Bram Van Bockstaele; Gershon Ben-Shakhar; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Neurocognitive Deficits Associated with Antisocial Personality Disorder in Non-treatment-seeking Young Adults.

Authors:  Samuel R Chamberlain; Katie L Derbyshire; Eric W Leppink; Jon E Grant
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2016-06

6.  Small-scale deceit: deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds' early theories of mind.

Authors:  M Chandler; A S Fritz; S Hala
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1989-12

7.  The Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale: reliability and validity.

Authors:  J L Eisen; K A Phillips; L Baer; D A Beer; K D Atala; S A Rasmussen
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  A 5-trial adjusting delay discounting task: accurate discount rates in less than one minute.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Impulse control disorders: updated review of clinical characteristics and pharmacological management.

Authors:  Liana Schreiber; Brian L Odlaug; Jon E Grant
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  More intelligent extraverts are more likely to deceive.

Authors:  Justyna Sarzyńska; Marcel Falkiewicz; Monika Riegel; Justyna Babula; Daniel S Margulies; Edward Nęcka; Anna Grabowska; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.