Literature DB >> 30694387

Insights in work rehabilitation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Melissa Geeraerts1, Luis Carlos Silva Corten2, Marc van Det2, Misha Luyer3, Grard Nieuwenhuijzen3, Marloes Vermeer2, Jelle Ruurda4, Richard van Hillegersberg4, Ewout Kouwenhoven2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about work rehabilitation after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. The goal of this study was to further objectify the postoperative work rehabilitation. Not only duration of sick leave, but also the extent of return to work will be assessed.
METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study was conveyed between January 2009 and April 2014. Eighty-six preoperatively employed patients were included. Data regarding patients' preoperative occupation, actual job status, and postoperative duration until return to work were retrieved. Potential prognostic factors for work rehabilitation were analyzed. Complaints that could impede rehabilitation were questioned (based on EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). Work activity, defined as either partially or fully resumed professional activity as compared to the preoperative status, was measured at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, 40.2% of patients reached partial and 14.6% had full professional recovery and after 12 months 28.2% and 40.8%, respectively. After 18 months, a stagnation was seen (19.0% partial; 43.1% full recovery). Median follow-up was 18 months (IQR 12-18). Self-employment was a significant predictor for full professional recovery (p = 0.005, OR 2.45 95% CI 1.32-4.56). The median time to full professional recovery was shorter for this group. The most common complaint among all patients was fatigue. This complaint did not significantly differ between working (fully and partially) and non-working groups (p = 0.727).
CONCLUSIONS: Only approximately 40% of patients reached full professional recovery 1 year after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. Barely any progression toward return to work was seen after 1 year postoperatively. Roughly 30% of patients never returned to work. Self-employed workers had a higher percentage of restoration to full professional activity, as well as shorter duration to return. These findings highlight the importance of adequate counseling of patients in order to prepare them for the impact of this procedure on professional activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Work rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694387     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06626-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes: what are the research needs?

Authors:  John F Steiner; Tia A Cavender; Deborah S Main; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The return to work experiences of colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sanchez; Jean L Richardson; Hyacinth R C Mason
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  2004-12

3.  Work absence after breast cancer diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mélanie Drolet; Elizabeth Maunsell; Myrto Mondor; Chantal Brisson; Jacques Brisson; Benoît Mâsse; Luc Deschênes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Association of coping style, pain, age and depression with fatigue in women with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Katrin Reuter; Catherine C Classen; Joseph A Roscoe; Gary R Morrow; Jeffrey J Kirshner; Richard Rosenbluth; Patrick J Flynn; Kathleen Shedlock; David Spiegel
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer.

Authors:  F Kennedy; C Haslam; F Munir; J Pryce
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  The impact of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer on paid and unpaid labor.

Authors:  Mandy van den Brink; Wilbert B van den Hout; Job Kievit; Corrie A M Marijnen; Hein Putter; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review.

Authors:  Evelien R Spelten; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Jos H A M Verbeek
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Cancer-related fatigue: the scale of the problem.

Authors:  Maarten Hofman; Julie L Ryan; Colmar D Figueroa-Moseley; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007

9.  Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work-a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  E R Spelten; J H A M Verbeek; A L J Uitterhoeve; A C Ansink; J van der Lelie; T M de Reijke; M Kammeijer; J C J M de Haes; M A G Sprangers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Barriers to rehabilitation of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; George J Chang; John M Skibber
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.