Literature DB >> 30694034

Evaluation of common suturing techniques to secure implantable cardiac electronic device leads: Which strategy best reduces the lead dislodgement risk?

Saman Rezazadeh1, Samuel Wang1, Jacques Rizkallah1.   

Abstract

Summary: Implantable cardiac electronic device lead dislodgment is a relatively common complication and carries significant comorbidities. A potential cause of lead dislodgement includes inadequate anchoring along the lead suture sleeve at the venous insertion site. We assessed which of the 3 commonly applied knot-tying techniques results in the most effective anchoring of a pacing lead along its suture sleeve, which could be associated with minimized lead motion postimplant. Following controlled traction force measurements, the anchor knot technique offered the greatest amount of lead stability when compared with the simple knot and the looping knot techniques.
© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694034      PMCID: PMC6351253          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.002418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  3 in total

1.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney; Cynthia M Tracy; Andrew E Epstein; Dawood Darbar; John P DiMarco; Sandra B Dunbar; N A Mark Estes; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephen C Hammill; Pamela E Karasik; Mark S Link; Joseph E Marine; Mark H Schoenfeld; Amit J Shanker; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; William G Stevenson; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Polyzos; Athanasios A Konstantelias; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation.

Authors:  A Ghani; P P H M Delnoy; A R Ramdat Misier; J J J Smit; A Adiyaman; J P Ottervanger; A Elvan
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.380

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Strategies for the Long-Term Preservation of Site for Future Implantation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Two Decades of Experience.

Authors:  Bakhtawar Shah; Shahab Saidullah; Muhammad Aamer Niaz; Farrukh Zaman; Zahida Parveen; Aamir Ghazanfar; Hassan Mumtaz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.