Liang Wen1,2,3, Bing Xin1, Panyisha Wu1,2, Chia-Hao Lin4, Chuanhui Peng1,3, Gaowei Wang1, Jin Lee1, Li-Fan Lu4, Gen-Sheng Feng1. 1. Department of Pathology, Division of Biological Sciences and Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 2. Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P.R. China. 3. Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P.R. China. 4. Division of Biological Sciences, Center for Microbiome Innovation and Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Abstract
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors for liver cancer, while active in many clinical trials worldwide, may have uncertain outcomes due to the unique immunotolerant microenvironment of the liver. In previous experiments, we unexpectedly identified a robust liver tumor-preventive effect of a synthetic double-stranded RNA, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (polyIC), in mice. Herein we further demonstrate that polyIC given at the precancer stage effectively prevented liver tumorigenesis by activating natural killer cells, macrophages, and some T-cell subsets; no inhibitory effect was observed on tumor progression if injected after tumor initiation. Nevertheless, polyIC administration potently induced programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in liver sinusoid endothelial cells, which prompted us to test a combined treatment of polyIC and PD-L1 antibody (Ab). Although injecting PD-L1 Ab alone did not show any therapeutic effect, injection of polyIC sensitized the hepatic response to PD-L1 blockade. Combination of polyIC and PD-L1 Ab resulted in sustained accumulation of active cluster of differentiation 8 cytotoxic T cells and robust liver tumor suppression and conferred a survival advantage in mice. These preclinical data in animal models suggest that, despite the low efficacy of PD-L1/PD-1 blockade alone, careful design of mechanism-based combinatorial immunotherapeutic protocols may shift the paradigm in liver cancer treatment by coordinating maximal activation of multiple innate and adaptive immune functions. Conclusion: We provide proof of principle for the development of an efficient prevention strategy of liver tumorigenesis and a powerful combination immunotherapy for primary liver cancer.
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors for liver cancer, while active in many clinical trials worldwide, may have uncertain outcomes due to the unique immunotolerant microenvironment of the liver. In previous experiments, we unexpectedly identified a robust liver tumor-preventive effect of a synthetic double-stranded RNA, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (polyIC), in mice. Herein we further demonstrate that polyIC given at the precancer stage effectively prevented liver tumorigenesis by activating natural killer cells, macrophages, and some T-cell subsets; no inhibitory effect was observed on tumor progression if injected after tumor initiation. Nevertheless, polyIC administration potently induced programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in liver sinusoid endothelial cells, which prompted us to test a combined treatment of polyIC and PD-L1 antibody (Ab). Although injecting PD-L1 Ab alone did not show any therapeutic effect, injection of polyIC sensitized the hepatic response to PD-L1 blockade. Combination of polyIC and PD-L1 Ab resulted in sustained accumulation of active cluster of differentiation 8 cytotoxic T cells and robust liver tumor suppression and conferred a survival advantage in mice. These preclinical data in animal models suggest that, despite the low efficacy of PD-L1/PD-1 blockade alone, careful design of mechanism-based combinatorial immunotherapeutic protocols may shift the paradigm in liver cancer treatment by coordinating maximal activation of multiple innate and adaptive immune functions. Conclusion: We provide proof of principle for the development of an efficient prevention strategy of liver tumorigenesis and a powerful combination immunotherapy for primary liver cancer.
Authors: A Limmer; J Ohl; C Kurts; H G Ljunggren; Y Reiss; M Groettrup; F Momburg; B Arnold; P A Knolle Journal: Nat Med Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sandip K Datta; Vanessa Redecke; Kiley R Prilliman; Kenji Takabayashi; Maripat Corr; Thomas Tallant; Joseph DiDonato; Roman Dziarski; Shizuo Akira; Stephen P Schoenberger; Eyal Raz Journal: J Immunol Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Oliver Schulz; Sandra S Diebold; Margaret Chen; Tanja I Näslund; Martijn A Nolte; Lena Alexopoulou; Yasu-Taka Azuma; Richard A Flavell; Peter Liljeström; Caetano Reis e Sousa Journal: Nature Date: 2005-02-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stephen McCartney; William Vermi; Susan Gilfillan; Marina Cella; Theresa L Murphy; Robert D Schreiber; Kenneth M Murphy; Marco Colonna Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Lowella Heinecke; David Proud; Scherer Sanders; Robert P Schleimer; Jean Kim Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wendy S Chen; Yan Liang; Min Zong; Jacey J Liu; Kota Kaneko; Kaisa L Hanley; Kun Zhang; Gen-Sheng Feng Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 9.423