Xian Qin1, Jiahui Xu1, Yiming Wu1, Xiaogang Liu1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543, Singapore. 2. Center for Functional Materials, NUS Suzhou Research Institute, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, P. R. China.
Abstract
Advanced nanoscale synthetic techniques provide a versatile platform for programmable control over the size, morphology, and composition of nanocrystals doped with lanthanide ions. Characteristic upconversion luminescence features originating from the 4f-4f optical transitions of lanthanides can be achieved through predesigned energy transfer pathways, enabling wide applications ranging from ultrasensitive biological detection to advanced spectroscopic instrumentation with high spatiotemporal resolution. Here, we review recent scientific and technological discoveries that have prompted the realization of these peculiar functions of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals and discuss the mechanistic studies of energy transfer involved in upconversion processes. These advanced schemes include cross relaxation-mediated depletion, multipulse sequential pumping, and nanostructural configuration design. Our emphasis is placed on disruptive technologies such as super-resolution microscopy, optogenetics, nanolasing, and optical anticounterfeiting, which take full advantage of the upconversion nanophenomena in relation to lanthanide-doped nanocrystals.
Advanced nanoscale synthetic techniques provide a versatile platform for programmable control over the size, morphology, and composition of nanocrystals doped with lanthanide ions. Characteristic upconversion luminescence features originating from the 4f-4f optical transitions of lanthanides can be achieved through predesigned energy transfer pathways, enabling wide applications ranging from ultrasensitive biological detection to advanced spectroscopic instrumentation with high spatiotemporal resolution. Here, we review recent scientific and technological discoveries that have prompted the realization of these peculiar functions of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals and discuss the mechanistic studies of energy transfer involved in upconversion processes. These advanced schemes include cross relaxation-mediated depletion, multipulse sequential pumping, and nanostructural configuration design. Our emphasis is placed on disruptive technologies such as super-resolution microscopy, optogenetics, nanolasing, and optical anticounterfeiting, which take full advantage of the upconversion nanophenomena in relation to lanthanide-doped nanocrystals.
Photon upconversion, an
unusual nonlinear optical process, has
attracted tremendous research interest due largely to its ability
to realize frequency conversion without stringent constraints, such
as the prerequisite of phase matching in second harmonic generation.
Because of their abundant ladder-like 4f energy levels, lanthanide
ions, when embedded in inorganic hosts, have proven effective in achieving
photon upconversion through the successive absorption of low excitation
energies followed by the emission of high-energy photons. The phenomenon
of photon upconversion through lanthanides was first observed by Nicolaas
Bloembergen in 1959 when he intended to count the number of infrared
photons by colliding them with solid crystals doped with lanthanide
or transition metal ions.[1] As an effective
pumping source, the advent of lasers has significantly facilitated
the development of upconversion luminescence materials, made evident
in the pioneering works of François Auzel and of Ovsyankin
and Feofilov.[2,3] To date, lanthanide-doped upconversion
materials have been exploited for various applications by taking advantage
of their ability to convert near-infrared (NIR) incident light into
high-energy ultraviolet or visible emissions.[2,4,5]The advent of nanotechnology provides
a powerful tool to control
the size of lanthanide-doped materials down to the nanometer length
scale, with the smallest being ∼2 nm in diameter.[6] Unlike quantum dots dominated by size-dependent
quantum phenomenon, the luminescence profiles of lanthanide-doped
nanocrystals are hardly affected by miniaturization because of the
direct pumping of the lanthanide ions and the inertness of the lanthanide’s
4f orbitals to its surroundings. Energy transfer within such a luminescence
system occurs mainly among the dopants, which enables the modulation
of the energy transfer pathways through spatial control over the dopant–dopant
distance during the nanocrystal growth stage. For example, by deliberately
controlling the doping concentration or the geometric structure, emission
colors covering the entire visible spectral region can be achieved
in lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals since the intensity
ratio between the different emission bands is critically dependent
on the dopant–dopant distance.[7] Alternatively,
full-color emission at single-particle levels can be obtained from
multilayer core–shell structured nanocrystals that are sensitive
to the laser pulse duration.[8] In addition,
upconversion luminescence from lanthanide activators without long-lived
intermediate states is accessible through the use of gadolinium-based
core–shell nanoparticles.[9] These
unique optical properties provide upconversion nanocrystals with unparalleled
capabilities for applications that would otherwise be unattainable
through their bulk counterparts (Figure ).
Figure 1
Representative scientific and technological
breakthroughs through
the development of functionalized upconversion nanocrystals.
Representative scientific and technological
breakthroughs through
the development of functionalized upconversion nanocrystals.Despite the considerable achievements
over the past eight years,
the low quantum conversion efficiency remains the key bottleneck that
prevents the utility of upconversion nanocrystals for practical applications.
Compared with bulk materials, the upconversion luminescence from nanocrystals
suffers from more severe quenching due to a higher density of surface-bound
activators, by which the excitation energy is dissipated nonradiatively.
Hence, the structural configuration and composition of the nanocrystals
need to be precisely controlled during the synthesis, which poses
added constraints in the manipulation of luminescence profiles. On
a separate note, these constraints are likely to stimulate researchers
to develop innovative and effective solutions. Indeed, impressive
progress has been made over the past few years in upconversion luminescence
enhancement through modification of the energy transfer processes
such as surface passivation, pumping scheme design, host matrix selection,
surface plasmonic coupling, and photonic crystal modulation.[10,11]In view of the already extensive literature on upconversion
nanocrystals,
we focus here on recent developments in which energy transfer-governed
upconversion emission could be realized through intrinsic structural
and compositional control as well as different modes of external stimulation.
We begin with a brief description of the basic principles underlying
the upconversion process, followed by discussion of the major challenges
in improving the optical performance of upconversion nanocrystals.
We also review the recent use of upconversion nanocrystals to provide
multilevel anticounterfeiting, perform super-resolution microscopy,
interrogate neural circuitry, and investigate upconversion lasing.
The emphasis is placed on emerging areas in which upconversion nanocrystals
show particular advantages over their widely used optical material
counterpart, organic dyes.
Fundamentals
Upconversion Mechanism
A given upconversion
nanocrystal usually consists of an inorganic host matrix and lanthanidedopants that typically occupy the lattice sites. When lanthanide ions
sense the crystal field of the host lattice, the probability of optical
transitions within the 4f manifolds can be greatly enhanced due to
the relaxation of the spectroscopic selection rule. Unlike traditional
semiconductors, upconversion nanocrystals principally do not feature
host-sensitized emission. Instead, the lanthanidedopants serve as
active luminescence centers that are responsible for excitation energy
absorption, energy transfer, and radiative emission processes. Upconversion
mechanisms can be generally categorized into excited state absorption
(ESA), energy transfer upconversion (ETU), photon avalanche (PA),
cooperative energy transfer (CET), and energy migration-mediated upconversion
(EMU). Among these five mechanisms, ETU has been demonstrated to be
the most efficient process. In the simplest ETU system, two types
of lanthanides, namely, sensitizers and activators, are codoped to
enable high efficiency energy harvesting and emission. Although the
energy transfer process prevails in the ETU mechanism, this process
has also been widely observed in nanocrystals governed by PA, CET,
and EMU mechanisms. In addition, the ESA process may occur concurrently
with other processes when a given upconversion system encounters an
appropriate level of pumping energy. By comparison, the EMU process
mainly occurs in a core–shell particle comprising energy migrators,
which can effectively bridge the excitation energy from the sensitizer
to the emitter across multilayered interfaces. This design enables
the minimization of deleterious cross relaxation between distinct
lanthanide ions, thus resulting in drastic upconversion amplification
from a series of activators without ladder-like intermediate states.[9] As the mechanistic investigation is beyond the
scope of this review, readers are encouraged to refer to previously
published reviews and tutorials for more details.[12−15]
Energy
Transfer Efficiency
Achieving
a high upconversion efficiency is of paramount importance to practical
applications. Despite significant efforts, the conversion efficiency
of nanocrystals remains much lower than that of their bulk equivalents,
as evidenced by the reported low quantum yield (∼0.1%) of NaYF4:Yb,Er nanoparticles with a diameter of 30 nm.[16] Apart from the intrinsic parity-forbidden nature
of 4f–4f optical transitions, the typically low conversion
efficiency arises mainly from the presence of surface quenchers such
as lattice defects and solvent molecules, which suppress the effective
energy transfer through nonradiative decay. Owing to the high surface-to-volume
ratio of nanocrystals, a major task of nanocrystal design lies in
understanding how surface quenchers disturb the energy transfer process.The energy transfer
pathways in a given nanocrystal could be divided into four classes:
(i) ion–ion energy transfer, (ii) ion-defect energy transfer,
(iii) ion-ligand energy transfer, and (iv) particle–particle
energy transfer, as illustrated in Figure . Notably, for class (i), energy transfer
is possible not only between lanthanide ions but also between lanthanide
and transition metal ions. Given the distance dependence of the energy
transfer rate, the determination of the dopant distribution in a nanoparticle
of interest is critical. In general, the core of the nanoparticle
inherits the atomic arrangement from its bulk counterpart, where the
crystallinity is essentially maintained. Instead of occupying interstitial
sites, lanthanide ions or other types of metaldopants tend to statistically
substitute for host cations featuring a similar valence charge, as
recently confirmed by high-resolution scanning transmission electron
microscopy.[17] There is a general consensus
that the distance between dopants can be estimated using the crystallographic
parameters of the host lattice. However, this theorem does not hold
for small nanoparticles with high surface areas. For example, when
doped into a NaGdF4 nanocrystal, Tb3+ and Nd3+ were found to preferentially replace Gd3+ in
center and edge sites, respectively, irrespective of the similar ionic
radius among these lanthanide ions.[18] In
another study, trivalent Pr, Tb, and Dy ions were observed to occupy
sites mainly on the surface of SnO2 nanoparticles, while
Eu3+ and Sm3+ showed multimodal distributions.[19] Clearly, such nonstatistical distribution of
dopants in nanocrystals may complicate the determination of the dopant–dopant
distance and thus impede the estimation of the energy transfer rate.
Figure 2
Schematic
illustration showing four major energy transfer pathways
dominated in upconverting nanosystems. A list of chemical and physical
approaches to energy transfer manipulation is included in the scheme.
Schematic
illustration showing four major energy transfer pathways
dominated in upconverting nanosystems. A list of chemical and physical
approaches to energy transfer manipulation is included in the scheme.Importantly, the number of lattice
defects can increase rapidly
in nanoparticles, with most residing on the surface of the nanoparticles.
Moreover, heterovalent doping usually requires the formation of particular
defects to maintain the entire system in the neutral state. Accordingly,
the existence of defects not only complicates the process of distance
measurement but also leads to unwanted nonradiative energy transfer
between dopants and defects,[20] as seen
in the case of type (ii) energy transfer. Unfortunately, the excitation
energies stored in the defect sites usually dissipate through the
vibration of the host lattice in the form of heat. The currently reported
models for the calculation of the energy transfer rate do not account
for the probability of ion-defect pathway-mediated energy transfer,
which may lead to unavoidable deviation from the actual process of
energy transfer within nanoparticles.The type (iii) energy
transfer pathway is associated with the interaction
between the dopant ions and the ligands attached to the surface of
a given nanoparticle. This interaction arises because ligands are
often required for stabilizing the nanoparticles in solvents. Such
pathways can be seen in two different scenarios. One is that the surface
dopants directly chelate with the ligands, resembling the formation
of lanthanide-based complexes.[21] In the
second case, energy transfer can occur between the ligands and the
dopants resting at the subsurface or even in the center of the particles,
depending on the actual dopant–ligand distance.[22−24] When constructing a model for the calculation of this transfer rate,
these two scenarios should be equally considered.As the particle
size continues to decrease, the energy transfer
(type iv) via particle−particle channels becomes important,
especially for nanofluids with high particle concentrations. The distance
between these nanoparticles can be dictated by adopting specific ligands
with extended carbon chains of different lengths.[25] Interestingly, particle–particle energy transfer
could endow the nanosystem with intriguing upconversion emission profiles
accessible by self-assembled nanostructures.[26−28] Thus, the contribution
of the particle–particle channel to the transfer rate should
be carefully examined.
Energy Transfer Manipulation
Energy
transfer is an essential process in upconversion, and its manipulation
has been demonstrated to be effective for tuning emission profiles,
such as emission color and lifetime. On the other hand, energy transfer
from dopants to surface defects or ligands could lead to a substantial
decrease in upconversion efficiency. In this subsection, we summarize
common strategies that are currently implemented to regulate the energy
transfer process.In light of the competition between the different
energy transfer processes, the precise determination of the transfer
rate for a specific pathway has been challenging. In general, the
key factors affecting energy transfer include ion distribution, wave
function coupling, and energy overlap integral. Varying the distribution
of the dopants is the most straightforward approach to tuning the
type (i) energy transfer process. For instance, an increase in the
doping concentration facilitates cross relaxation between dopants
as a result of the reduced ion–ion distance. Another method
to control the ion distribution is to identify particular hosts in
which lanthanide ions tend to segregate in the form of chains or clusters
upon host cation substitution.[29] As such,
intriguing luminescence phenomena, such as five-photon upconversion[30] and single-band emission,[31] can be achieved. The intercalation of additional metal
ions (Cd2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, etc.) may
also alter the ion distribution in the host lattice.[32,33]Nanoparticle synthesis is a trivial process in which the formation
of surface quenchers occurs spontaneously and subsequently amounts
to added channels for unwanted energy transfer (type ii and iii).[34,35] For example, the unexpected incorporation of hydroxyl ions (OH–) into nanoparticles could reduce upconversion conversion
efficiency.[35] Currently, the most effective
approach for eliminating surface quenchers is to grow an optically
inert shell onto the bare core nanoparticles. The effectiveness of
such core–shell structures for the suppression of nonradiative
emission has been validated, as evidenced by the enhanced upconversion
luminescence upon the removal of surface quenchers through core–shell
engineering.[17,36] The core–shell design
could be used to suppress the deleterious process of cross relaxation
by enlarging the dopant–dopant distance, thus maximizing the
upconversion efficiency.[37] Apart from surface
passivation, a core–shell design can also be used to design
the energy transfer pathways and allow the realization of novel upconversion
features, including full-color emission[8] and new activator development.[9] For more
details, readers are encouraged to refer to the work of Chen et al.,
in which the criteria and recipes for core–shell nanoparticle
design and synthesis are well summarized.[38]In addition to the manipulation of the particle’s composition
and structure, the amplification in local electromagnetic field by
coupling noble metals has also proven effective in drastically enhancing
upconversion efficiency.[10,39−41] Such plasmon-mediated upconversion enhancement is generally ascribed
to the increase in the incident pumping flux or radiative decay rate.[42−45] Of particular note is that the effect of surface plasmons on the
energy transfer has been decoupled from the aforementioned enhancement
in upconversion absorption and emission processes.[46−49] The manipulation of energy transfer
through plasmonic resonance can significantly benefit practical applications,
such as upconversion-mediated photovoltaics and bioimaging, in which
low-power irradiance is highly desirable. Given the distance-dependent
plasmon-enhanced upconversion, the structure and shape of plasmonic
materials in the form of sphere, rod, pillar/hole array, and core–shell
particle need to be exquisitely designed to maximize the upconversion
enhancement.[43,45,50]
Emerging Applications
Over the past
few years, the rapid development of nanoparticles
with multimodal functionalities has allowed the applications of nanoparticles
to be expanded from biomolecular sensing[51,52] to deep-tissue imaging,[53] lighting,[54] and the measurement of the instantaneous Brownian
velocity.[55] In this section, we attempt
to highlight the broad utility of upconversion nanoparticles in super-resolution
microscopy, optogenetics, lasing, and multilevel anticounterfeiting.
Super-Resolution Microscopy
Luminescent
biomarkers, when combined with microscopic imaging techniques, have
been demonstrated to be effective for visualizing tissue structures
and the dynamics of physiological processes. However, the application
of such imaging techniques in the life science is often hampered by
low spatial resolution. By employing an organic dye-based luminescent
probe, the best lateral resolution that a given far-field optical
microscope can achieve is approximately half the wavelength of the
excitation light. Such distance resolution between two point objects
was defined as the diffraction limit by Abbe in 1873.[56] Thus, the optical resolution is usually ∼200 nm
laterally and ∼500 nm axially, which is far too large for the
precise tracing of biological events, which typically occur at scales
of a few to tens of nanometers.Given the luminescence nature
of the markers, subdiffraction resolution can be achieved by partially
switching on or off the emission originating from a specific area
of the phosphors under study. To date, many far-field fluorescence
microscopies have been developed for super-resolution imaging such
as stimulated single-molecule localization nanoscopy, saturated structured
illumination microscopy, and stimulated emission depletion microscopy
(STED). In this section, we review the development of upconversion
nanoparticle-associated STED nanoscopy and its utility for bioimaging.The STED technique typically involves the use of a dual-laser system:
one laser beam as the excitation source and the other one with a donut-shaped
focal spot for emission depletion. Upon the excitation of a fluorophore,
the second beam source is able to switch off the luminescence of the
fluorophore at the donut-shaped periphery (Figure a). The size of the emission spot is thereby
significantly reduced, and the lateral resolution is subsequently
improved, as illustrated in Figure b–d. To date, many STED microscopes with different
modalities have been developed for high-resolution bioimaging.[57,58] Despite considerable efforts, further advancement in the performance
of STED microscopy has been hindered by the inherent limitations associated
with conventional optical contrast agents, including photobleaching,
photoblinking, autofluorescence, and a shallow imaging depth. In addition,
the operation of these optical materials usually requires high-power
depletion lasers, which may induce light toxicity and aggravate the
degree of photobleaching.
Figure 3
(a) Schematic diagram of a simplified STED experimental
setup.
(b, c) A scheme showing the effective point spread function (PSF)
achieved by overlaying the excitation beam with the donut-shaped depletion
beam. (d) A scheme showing the decrease in the size of the effective
PSF obtained by increasing the intensity of the depletion laser. (e)
Emission spectra of NaYF4:18%Yb/10%Tm nanoparticles upon
different wavelength excitations. Note that 96% depletion efficiency
of the 455 nm emission can be achieved by simultaneously implementing
980 nm CW excitation and 810 nm CW depletion. (f) Schematic sketch
of net cross relaxation-mediated stimulated depletion (left) and net
synergistic enhancement (right), typically observed from upconversion
nanocrystals with high and low Tm3+ doping concentrations.
(g, h) High resolution imaging, in multiphoton mode and STED mode,
of cytoskeleton structures and desmin proteins in HeLa cancer cells.
Panel d reproduced with permission from ref (58). Copyright 2013 Frontiers.
Panels e–f reproduced with permission from ref (67). Copyright 2017 Nature.
(a) Schematic diagram of a simplified STED experimental
setup.
(b, c) A scheme showing the effective point spread function (PSF)
achieved by overlaying the excitation beam with the donut-shaped depletion
beam. (d) A scheme showing the decrease in the size of the effective
PSF obtained by increasing the intensity of the depletion laser. (e)
Emission spectra of NaYF4:18%Yb/10%Tm nanoparticles upon
different wavelength excitations. Note that 96% depletion efficiency
of the 455 nm emission can be achieved by simultaneously implementing
980 nm CW excitation and 810 nm CW depletion. (f) Schematic sketch
of net cross relaxation-mediated stimulated depletion (left) and net
synergistic enhancement (right), typically observed from upconversion
nanocrystals with high and low Tm3+ doping concentrations.
(g, h) High resolution imaging, in multiphoton mode and STED mode,
of cytoskeleton structures and desmin proteins in HeLa cancer cells.
Panel d reproduced with permission from ref (58). Copyright 2013 Frontiers.
Panels e–f reproduced with permission from ref (67). Copyright 2017 Nature.In contrast to conventional biomarkers,
lanthanide-doped upconversion
nanoparticles allow deep-tissue labeling and imaging to be performed
without photobleaching and photoblinking. Moreover, the overheating-induced
toxicity can be effectively circumvented by choosing an appropriate
lanthanide sensitizer that has absorption in biological windows.[59−63] With the help of the STED technique, researchers have demonstrated
subdiffraction imaging using upconversion nanoparticles. The first
demonstration of such efforts was reported in 2011 by Kolesov et al.,
who showed that an optical resolution of 50 nm could be achieved upon
the excitation of Pr-doped YAG (Y3Al5O12) ultraviolet-emitting nanoprobes.[64] Notably,
instead of emission depletion, stimulated excited state absorption
is responsible for breaking the diffraction limit. However, their
method is not suitable for bioimaging because the excitation and emission
wavelengths under study fall short of the biological window. In another
study involving NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles, stimulated excited
state absorption was again recognized as the main cause of the enhancement
of the imaging resolution, when illuminated by two NIR beams simultaneously.[65] Despite the high brightness and deep-tissue
penetration ability enabled by these fluoride-based nanoparticles,
the reported maximum depletion efficiency of the green emission is
merely 30%, leading to a relatively low signal-to-noise ratio.In 2017, a classical stimulated
emission depletion was observed by Jin and co-workers in highly doped
NaYF4:Yb/Tm nanoparticles upon concurrent illumination
with 980 and 808 nm lasers.[66] The researchers
argued that the cross relaxation-induced population inversion between
the intermediate state and the ground state is a prerequisite for
the successful depletion of the blue emission originating from Tm3+ emitters. Notably, the switch-off efficiency of the blue
emission can reach 90% to result in a substantial reduction in the
lateral resolution down to 28 nm. The cross relaxation in highly doped
nanoparticles not only enables stimulated emission but also significantly
lowers the threshold of the depletion intensity compared to the one
used for conventional probe depletion.A similar depletion phenomenon
was reported by Zhan and He and
their co-workers (Figure e).[67] However, the researchers
claimed that stimulated depletion occurs between higher-lying excited
states and intermediate states rather than the optical transition
between intermediate and ground states, as depicted in Figure f. Additionally, cross relaxation
was found to compensate for stimulation-induced upconversion enhancement,
accompanied by a reduction in the depletion intensity. Apparently,
the way by which the cross relaxation-associated energy transfer prompts
the depletion of the emission requires further mechanistic study.By view of the existence of abundant energy levels in lanthanides,
their optical population can be depleted by different stimulation
sources at specific wavelengths. For example, apart from the 800 nm-induced
depletion of the blue emission of NaYF4:Yb/Tm nanoparticles,
both the blue and red emissions of these nanoparticles can also be
quenched by combining 980 and 1550 nm lasers.[68] Such a mode of operation can also be employed to suppress the red
emission of NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoprticles.[69] More interestingly, two-color super-resolution imaging
has also been demonstrated by using a mixture of NaYF4:Yb/Tm
and NaGdF4:Yb/Tm@NaGdF4:Tb nanoparticles as
luminescent markers, by which only one pair of excitation-depletion
beams is needed.[67]Lanthanide-doped
upconversion nanoparticles have been considered
as promising probes for imaging cellular structures both in vitro
and in vivo. When coupled with the STED technique, these nanoparticles
allow the visualization of subcellular fine-structures with high spatial
resolution. The proof-of-concept study was first validated in the
case of the cytoskeleton imaging of HeLa cells using 12 nm NaGdF4:Yb/Tm nanoparticles (Figure g,h).[67] The dual-beam operation
at 975 and 810 nm enabled subcellular imaging with a lateral resolution
of 82 nm.Further improvement in the upconversion-based imaging
resolution
requires a considerable reduction in the particle size. However, the
synthesis of small nanoparticles with a high upconversion efficiency
remains a challenge because they often suffer from severe surface
quenching. To boost the imaging contrast, the most straightforward
approach is to increase the amount of nanoparticles, which may induce
undesired physiological toxicity to biological species. Upconversion
nanoparticles may not be suitable for fast scanning imaging as a streaking
effect, due to the long decay time of the lanthanide emission, is
often encountered. To overcome this drawback, a decrease in the pixel
dwell time is likely to counteract this negative effect. Additionally,
the improvement of the axial resolution and the simplification of
the technological complexity need to be well addressed before STED
nanoscopy can be widely deployed for clinical bioimaging.[57]
Optogenetics
Optogenetics
has been
touted as a revolutionary biotechnology that allows neuromodulation
via the optical stimulation of photoresponsive proteins. Upon illumination
at a specific visible wavelength, proteins such as Channelrhodopsin-2
(ChR2) and C1V1 (a red-shifted opsin with several variants) will be
activated to open light-gated ion channels and subsequently induce
membrane depolarization (Figure a,b). The light stimulation can also close the ion
channels, depending on the type of opsin proteins under investigation.
Despite their enticing prospects, the advancements of optogenetic
techniques for in vivo applications are hampered, mainly due to poor
tissue penetration of visible light. To alleviate the light attenuation,
traditional optogenetic approaches usually require the implantation
of optical fibers for light transport during in vivo experiments.
Obviously, the implantation of fiber optics damages the tissue along
its path, disturbs the physiology of organs, alters neuronal function,
and imposes movement constraint and behavioral limitation in wake
subjects.
Figure 4
Schematic illustration of the underlying mechanisms of optogenetic
control through ChR2 protein over the opening/closing of ion channels
in a cellular membrane. Ca2+ and Na+ can access
the interior cell when ChR2 is activated upon 470 nm irradiation,
resulting in membrane depolarization and neuronal signal firing. (a)
The ion channel protein ChR2 is initially blocked in the dark. (b)
ChR2 opens for cation transportation when excited by blue light. (c)
Activation of the ChR2 channel through the use of upconversion nanoparticles
upon 980 nm excitation.
Schematic illustration of the underlying mechanisms of optogenetic
control through ChR2 protein over the opening/closing of ion channels
in a cellular membrane. Ca2+ and Na+ can access
the interior cell when ChR2 is activated upon 470 nm irradiation,
resulting in membrane depolarization and neuronal signal firing. (a)
The ion channel protein ChR2 is initially blocked in the dark. (b)
ChR2 opens for cation transportation when excited by blue light. (c)
Activation of the ChR2 channel through the use of upconversion nanoparticles
upon 980 nm excitation.Upconversion nanoparticles can serve as remote light transducers
for the minimally invasive control of deep-tissue neuronal activities
(Figure c). The concept
of using upconversion nanoparticles for optogenetics was first proposed
in 2011 by Deisseroth and Anikeeva.[70] It
was not until 2015 that optogenetic-based brain stimulation became
more prominent in the field of neuromodulation. Several groups independently
studied the feasibility of using upconversion nanoparticles to activate
opsin proteins via remote NIR light irradiation both in vitro and
in vivo (Figure ).[71−73] The size of the biosamples ranged from 10 μm cells to 10 cm
rodents. Studies of neurons, cultured or simply mixed with upconversion
nanoparticles, revealed that an inward current response can be detected
upon remote 980 nm light illumination.
Figure 5
Representative upconversion
nanoparticle-associated optogenetics
in vitro and in vivo. From left to right, cell, worm, fish, and mouse.
Neuron cells. Top: Schematic illustration showing the use of polymer–nanocrystal
hybrid scaffolds for neuron activation. Bottom: The magnified neuron–nanocrystal
interface (left) and the repetitive potentials of a current–clamped
hippocampal neuron evoked by 980 nm light irradiation (right). Caenorhabditis elegans. Top: Representative images showing
the upconversion-mediated optogenetic reversal behavior of a worm
with ChR2 expression in their mechanosensory neurons. Bottom: The
correlation of the reversal response percentage with the concentration
of the incubated upconversion nanocrystals (bottom left) and the recorded
reversal response percentage under four types of experimental conditions.
Zebrafish. In vivo photoluminescence imaging of zebrafish incubated
with upconversion nanoparticles. Scale bar is 10 μm. Mouse.
In vivo upconversion optogenetics. Top: X-ray and fluorescence images
of the implanted micro-optrodes and the regions expressing ChR2 opsin.
Bottom left: Schematic illustration showing transcranial NIR stimulation
of the hippocampal engram for memory recall. Bottom right: Optical
images of upconversion nanocrystals (blue) and EYFP-labeled ChR2 protein
(green) in the dentate gyrus of a mouse. Panel Neuron cells reproduced
with permission from ref (71). Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry. Panel C. elegans and panel Zebrafish reproduced with permission
from refs (74 and 75). Copyright
2016 and 2017 Wiley. Panel Mouse/Rat reproduced with permission from
refs (78 and 80). Copyright 2017
Elsevier Science and 2018 Science.
Representative upconversion
nanoparticle-associated optogenetics
in vitro and in vivo. From left to right, cell, worm, fish, and mouse.
Neuron cells. Top: Schematic illustration showing the use of polymer–nanocrystal
hybrid scaffolds for neuron activation. Bottom: The magnified neuron–nanocrystal
interface (left) and the repetitive potentials of a current–clamped
hippocampal neuron evoked by 980 nm light irradiation (right). Caenorhabditis elegans. Top: Representative images showing
the upconversion-mediated optogenetic reversal behavior of a worm
with ChR2 expression in their mechanosensory neurons. Bottom: The
correlation of the reversal response percentage with the concentration
of the incubated upconversion nanocrystals (bottom left) and the recorded
reversal response percentage under four types of experimental conditions.
Zebrafish. In vivo photoluminescence imaging of zebrafish incubated
with upconversion nanoparticles. Scale bar is 10 μm. Mouse.
In vivo upconversion optogenetics. Top: X-ray and fluorescence images
of the implanted micro-optrodes and the regions expressing ChR2 opsin.
Bottom left: Schematic illustration showing transcranial NIR stimulation
of the hippocampal engram for memory recall. Bottom right: Optical
images of upconversion nanocrystals (blue) and EYFP-labeled ChR2 protein
(green) in the dentate gyrus of a mouse. Panel Neuron cells reproduced
with permission from ref (71). Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry. Panel C. elegans and panel Zebrafish reproduced with permission
from refs (74 and 75). Copyright
2016 and 2017 Wiley. Panel Mouse/Rat reproduced with permission from
refs (78 and 80). Copyright 2017
Elsevier Science and 2018 Science.Compared to in vitro experimentation, the realization of
deep-tissue
penetration is of paramount importance for in vivo research. In 2015,
without the need for implanted optical fibers, the groups of Han and
Zhou successfully demonstrated that the incorporation of NaYF4:Yb/Tm@NaYF4 nanotransducers allows the remote
control of deep-tissue signaling events in response to Ca2+-dependent immune systems in mouse models.[73] In early 2016, the successful activation of ChR2 using NaYF4:Yb/Tm nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans was reported, as evidenced by the reversal response of the worms
(Figure ).[74] In another in vivo experiment on zebrafish larvae,
NaYF4:Yb/Tm/Nd@NaYF4:Nd core–shell nanoparticles
were specifically conjugated onto ChR2-expressing cell surface by
means of metabolic glycan biosynthesis (Figure ).[75] In another
study, precise subcellular stimulation was demonstrated through the
specific attachment of NaYbF4:Tm@NaYF4 nanoparticles
onto live HeLa cells.[76] It is of great
value to mention that lanthanide-doped nanoparticles can also be used
for multiplexed neuronal interrogation, by which the simultaneous
activation and inhibition of different opsin proteins can be achieved.[77]In two separate reports, upconversion
nanoactuator-mediated optogenetics
were validated for deep-brain stimulation in mammals (Figure ).[77−80] Specifically, Shi and co-workers
developed a small implantable microdevice comprising NaYF4:Yb/Er@NaYF4 nanoparticles. This microdevice provides
a tetherless method to remotely trigger spiking activities in rat
brains even at a tissue depth of 1 cm.[77−79] In a rather different
approach, the Liu and McHugh groups demonstrated the in vivo NIR optogenetic
control of multiple neuronal systems in a minimally invasive manner
by the local injection of NaYF4:Yb/Er-based nanoparticles.[80] Compared to systemic delivery through the blood,
such a direct injection can bypass the diffusion barrier between the
blood vessels and brain tissue, ensuring the delivery of the required
concentration within selective space for effective optical stimulation.
In addition to the control of neural activities, upconversion nanoparticle-based
optogenetic tools can also be used as a therapeutic method for controlling
the apoptotic signaling pathway of cancer cells, as demonstrated by
the work of Zheng et al.[81]Despite
those developments described above, the use of upconversion
nanoparticles for clinical optogenetics remains a formidable challenge.
One of the main reasons lies in the inadequate amount of light harvesting
because of the low efficiency of the photon upconversion process.
To improve the light harvesting for neuronal activation, a high concentration
of upconversion nanoparticles is generally needed. However, the random
diffusion of the nanoparticles taking place in biological media or
tissues may lead to a high level of physiological toxicity. Although
the encapsulation of nanoparticles in the form of an optotrode provides
a feasible solution to random diffusion,[78] such increase in the size of the nanotrasducer could cause irreversible
damage and inflammation in the host of tissues.High-power laser
pumping could also be considered as an alternative
method to improve the upconversion efficiency.[82−84] However, a
high pumping power at 980 nm can cause overheating in biological media
and tissues because water molecules absorb at 980 nm. Alternatively,
the effect of overheating can be significantly alleviated by using
dye- or Nd3+-sensitized nanoparticles that are excitable
at 800 nm.[75,85] Additionally, high upconversion
efficiency can also be achieved with the help of a quasi-CW laser.[74] The quasi-CW laser does not cause overheating,
even at a peak power of 4 W.For clinical applications, the
effect of body fluids on the optical
properties of nanoparticles and their long-term toxicity requires
a systematic study. The plasticity of the brain could also be another
key factor that determines the performance of such optogenetic tools
since maintaining continuous changes in neuronal networks may require
different patterns of stimulation. The optical properties of nanoparticles
must be adjustable according to specific physiological conditions.[86] However, such changes can also lead to variation
in the physical distance between the opsin proteins carrying ion channels
and the nanoparticles. In summary, upconversion nanoparticle-mediated
optogenetics remains in its infancy and truly deserves further fundamental
and technical investigation to deepen our understanding of the complex
chemical and physiological reactions occurring in the human brain.
Upconversion Lasing
Stimulated emission,
in laser action, has found broad applications including remote sensing,
data storage, medical therapeutics, and photochemistry. With the advance
in crystal growth technology, numerous solid-state lasers as alternatives
to traditional gas- and liquid-phase lasers have been successfully
developed since the 1980s, with emission wavelengths covering the
near-ultraviolet, visible, and NIR ranges. In particular, deep-ultraviolet
lasing has the potential to revolutionize precision engineering due
to its intrinsic characteristics such as a high photon energy and
high beam quality. To achieve such lasing, approaches involving excimers,
wide bandgap semiconductors, and nonlinear optical or upconversion
materials have been proposed. Upconversion-mediated lasers are particularly
attractive, enabling high-efficiency lasing in the near-/deep-ultraviolet
spectral region. More importantly, the realization of upconversion
has less stringent requirements such as phase matching, thus simplifying
the pump dynamics.The first demonstration of an upconversion
laser can be traced back to 1971 in Yb3+- and Ho3+-codopedBaY2F8 bulk materials.[87] Such a laser emits light with a wavelength of
554 nm when operated at cryogenic temperatures. Since then, lanthanide-based
upconversion lasers with a wide tuning range of wavelength have been
developed and summarized by Richard Scheps based on different upconversion
processes.[4] Despite these achievements,
the development of deep-ultraviolet upconversion lasing in bulk materials
remains challenging, largely due to the low pump efficiency of four-
or five-photon upconversion. Room-temperature operation can further
complicate the design of laser components. This deficiency arises
because the increase in temperature would depopulate higher excited
states and induce excited state absorption, thus restraining the population
inversion for lasing.Emerging nanotechnology has provided researchers
with a powerful
tool to precisely tune the transfer pathways of excitation energies
within a given material through rational design at the nanoscale.
In light of the distance-dependent energy transfer nature of lanthanides,
the structural engineering of nanocrystals allows significant enhancement
in the stimulated upconversion emission. For example, the occurrence
and amplification of stimulated emission have been investigated in
NaYF4:Yb/Tm nanocrystals for super-resolution fluorescence
microscopy.[66,67] Population inversion was detected
in highly Tm3+-doped nanocrystals upon NIR laser irradiation,
making these nanomaterials particularly suitable as the gain media
for upconversion lasing.In 2013, Wang and Yu and their co-workers
fabricated a room-temperature
microlaser based on NaYF4:Yb/Er@NaYF4 nanocrystals
as the gain medium (Figure a).[88] They developed a three-pulse
excitation scheme and achieved sufficient population inversion without
optical and thermal damage. Laser cavity configuration, either in
a bottle-like geometry or in a classic Fabry–Perot cavity,
is also crucial in generating lasing. To achieve deep-ultraviolet
stimulated emission, the same groups further refined both the pumping
scheme and the structure of the nanoparticles. By employing a similar
bottle-like microresonator, the researchers observed deep-ultraviolet
lasing at 311 nm upon five-pulse irradiation at 980 nm (Figure b).[89] Recently, white-light lasing was observed from NaYF4:Yb/Er/Tm
microrods, within which a whispering-gallery mode could be accommodated
(Figure c).[90]
Figure 6
Upconversion nanocrystal-based lasing. (a) Multicolor
pulse lasing
spectra observed from a microcavity in a bottle-like geometry with
a diameter (D) of 80 μm. The insets are images
of the microcavity under different excitation powers. (b) Room-temperature
deep-ultraviolet pulse lasing achieved through the use of a rationally
designed microresonator. I: Plot of the intensity output versus the
excitation power for a microresonator (Dm = 75 μm). The insets are the images of the microresonator
with and without optical excitation. II: The lasing spectra of the
microlaser at different excitation powers (Dm = 75 μm). (c) Room-temperature lasing spectra of three
upconversion microrods (∼3 μm in radius) upon 980 nm
excitation. The three small insets are the corresponding optical images,
while the two large insets are the simulated optical field distribution
within a microrod that emits at 654 nm and the optical image of a
microrod (∼4 μm in radius) that emits white light lasing.
(d) Continuous-wave lasing achieved by coupling energy-looping nanoparticles
(ELNPs) to whispering-gallery modes of polystyrene microspheres. I:
Schematic illustration showing the excitation and lasing occurring
within the nanoparticle-coated microbeads. TIR stands for total internal
reflection. II: Left: Wide-field image of the given lasing microbeads
showing optical modes circulating within the resonator. Right: x–y plane projection of the simulated
field distribution within a 5-μm polystyrene microsphere. Scale
bar: 1 μm. III: Compiled emission spectra of the nanoparticles
and the corresponding particle-coated beads, along with the simulated
NIR spectra of whispering-gallery modes supported by a microsphere
with a diameter of 5 μm. Panels a and c reproduced with permission
from refs (88 and 90). Copyright
2013 and 2017 American Chemical Society. Panels b and d reproduced
with permission from refs (89 and 91). Copyright 2016 and 2018 Nature.
Upconversion nanocrystal-based lasing. (a) Multicolor
pulse lasing
spectra observed from a microcavity in a bottle-like geometry with
a diameter (D) of 80 μm. The insets are images
of the microcavity under different excitation powers. (b) Room-temperature
deep-ultraviolet pulse lasing achieved through the use of a rationally
designed microresonator. I: Plot of the intensity output versus the
excitation power for a microresonator (Dm = 75 μm). The insets are the images of the microresonator
with and without optical excitation. II: The lasing spectra of the
microlaser at different excitation powers (Dm = 75 μm). (c) Room-temperature lasing spectra of three
upconversion microrods (∼3 μm in radius) upon 980 nm
excitation. The three small insets are the corresponding optical images,
while the two large insets are the simulated optical field distribution
within a microrod that emits at 654 nm and the optical image of a
microrod (∼4 μm in radius) that emits white light lasing.
(d) Continuous-wave lasing achieved by coupling energy-looping nanoparticles
(ELNPs) to whispering-gallery modes of polystyrene microspheres. I:
Schematic illustration showing the excitation and lasing occurring
within the nanoparticle-coated microbeads. TIR stands for total internal
reflection. II: Left: Wide-field image of the given lasing microbeads
showing optical modes circulating within the resonator. Right: x–y plane projection of the simulated
field distribution within a 5-μm polystyrene microsphere. Scale
bar: 1 μm. III: Compiled emission spectra of the nanoparticles
and the corresponding particle-coated beads, along with the simulated
NIR spectra of whispering-gallery modes supported by a microsphere
with a diameter of 5 μm. Panels a and c reproduced with permission
from refs (88 and 90). Copyright
2013 and 2017 American Chemical Society. Panels b and d reproduced
with permission from refs (89 and 91). Copyright 2016 and 2018 Nature.Another breakthrough in the field of upconversion nanoparticle-based
lasing was recently reported by Fernandez-Bravo et al., who used NaYF4:Gd/Tm@NaGdF4 nanoparticles to achieve continuous-wave
upconverted lasing at 450 and 800 nm upon 1064 nm pumping (Figure d).[91] By depositing the core–shell nanoparticles onto
a polystyrene microresonator, lasing without marked heat generation
is possible as the threshold for population inversion in Tm3+-doped nanoparticles is greatly reduced. Compared to the 980 nm excitation
beam, 1064 nm light is nonabsorbable by tissues. Heat-induced tissue
damage can be effectively circumvented. These newly developed nanolasers
open up a new avenue toward applications in bioimaging, biosensing,
and deep-tissue optogenetics.
Anticounterfeiting
The development
of high-fidelity anticounterfeiting techniques is currently in great
demand due to the rise of global counterfeiting and forgery in high-volume,
high-profit merchandise, including banknotes, trademark tags, classified
documents, and identity cards, as well as pharmaceutical products.
Counterfeiting creates societal instabilities, triggers the infringement
of intellectual property rights, and poses a great threat to medicine
legislation.Luminescence materials comprising lanthanide ions
have been broadly considered as effective agents for the prevention
of counterfeiting. For example, euro banknotes carry covert Eu(III)-containing
pigments, which can emit a characteristic orange-red color upon UV
excitation. By comparison, upconversion nanocrystals offers an added
layer of security protection because they can be excited by both UV
and NIR light. In this section, we will highlight recent advances
in applying upconversion colloidal nanoparticles as security inks
for anticounterfeiting.Similar to conventional luminescent
probes, the basic element for
anticounterfeiting involving upconversion nanoparticles is the emission
color, which is tunable from visible to NIR light.[7] Green-emitting NaYF4:Yb/Er and blue-emitting
NaYF4:Yb/Tm nanoparticles are the most popular materials
for upconversion-based anticounterfeiting measures (Figure a).[92] Nonetheless, a single-color emission hardly meets the criteria for
multilevel and high-fidelity anticounterfeiting applications. One
of the most straightforward strategies for enhancing the level of
the security is to increase the range of emission colors. By mixing
red-, green-, and blue-emissive upconversion nanoparticles in appropriate
ratios, an arbitrary emission color can be achieved, depending on
the percentages of the three primary colors. As a proof-of-concept,
Meruga et al. printed invisible quick-response codes composed of colloidal
upconversion nanoparticles. This invisible printing can be decrypted
when illuminated with a 980 nm laser (Figure b).[93] The design
of multicolor and graphic encryption offers a dual level of security
protection.
Figure 7
Representative upconversion nanocrystal-associated anticounterfeiting
at different levels of security. (a) Optical decoding of encrypted
papers through NIR light exposure. (b) Top: Red–green–blue
printing using nanoparticle-based inks. Bottom: Optical image of the
as-printed QR code featuring multicolor emission. (c) Multicolor barcoding
in a single microcrystal. Scale bar: 2 μm. (d) Multicolor barcoding
through upconversion nanoparticle-encapsulated polymeric microparticles.
Scale bar: 200 μm. (e–g) Anticounterfeiting based on
color and excitation characteristics. (h) Color and phase angle optical
encoding. (i) Lifetime-encoded anticounterfeiting. Note that different
colors represent different lifetimes. (j) Multilevel anticounterfeiting
through the use of nanoparticles with different colors, lifetimes
and pumping conditions. (k) Multilevel anticounterfeiting through
Mn2+-doped upconversion nanoparticles. Panels a, b, e,
and h reproduced with permission from refs (92, 93, 99, and 104). Copyright 2014, 2016, and 2017 Royal Society
of Chemistry. Panels c, g, and j reproduced with permission from refs (94, 103, and 106). Copyright 2014 and 2017 American Chemical Society. Panels d, f,
i, and k reproduced with permission from refs (95, 102, 105, and 107). Copyright 2014 and 2017 Nature.
Representative upconversion nanocrystal-associated anticounterfeiting
at different levels of security. (a) Optical decoding of encrypted
papers through NIR light exposure. (b) Top: Red–green–blue
printing using nanoparticle-based inks. Bottom: Optical image of the
as-printed QR code featuring multicolor emission. (c) Multicolor barcoding
in a single microcrystal. Scale bar: 2 μm. (d) Multicolor barcoding
through upconversion nanoparticle-encapsulated polymeric microparticles.
Scale bar: 200 μm. (e–g) Anticounterfeiting based on
color and excitation characteristics. (h) Color and phase angle optical
encoding. (i) Lifetime-encoded anticounterfeiting. Note that different
colors represent different lifetimes. (j) Multilevel anticounterfeiting
through the use of nanoparticles with different colors, lifetimes
and pumping conditions. (k) Multilevel anticounterfeiting through
Mn2+-doped upconversion nanoparticles. Panels a, b, e,
and h reproduced with permission from refs (92, 93, 99, and 104). Copyright 2014, 2016, and 2017 Royal Society
of Chemistry. Panels c, g, and j reproduced with permission from refs (94, 103, and 106). Copyright 2014 and 2017 American Chemical Society. Panels d, f,
i, and k reproduced with permission from refs (95, 102, 105, and 107). Copyright 2014 and 2017 Nature.Although multicolored upconversion
nanoparticles offer a large
variety of colors, spectral overlapping may become a concern and can
complicate the signal read-out. To overcome this problem, Zhang et
al. developed an epitaxial end-on growth method to prepare microrods
that could display different emission colors within a single microrod,
as shown in Figure c.[94] This stripe-like emission feature
was harnessed by the researchers to achieve security protection in
documents. In a separate study, a universal microfluidics-based technique
was adopted to pattern multicolor upconversion nanoparticles in the
form of microscale barcodes.[95] As shown
in Figure d, the emission
brightness and color fidelity of these nanoparticles remained largely
unaltered after the formation of the microscale barcodes. Another
feasible approach to achieving multicolor emission is by mixing upconversion
nanoparticles with their downshifting counterparts or other types
of luminophores, such as quantum dots.[96−98] With the color output
of the security inking materials being excitation-dependent, this
approach offers another dimension of anticounterfeiting (Figure e).[99]Anticounterfeiting based on a dual-modal manipulation
of upconversion
and downshifting luminescence can also be realized even on a single-particle
level.[100,101] Using this approach, the purity and fidelity
of the color can be largely preserved. By comparison, a simple mixing
of nanophosphors displaying different colors under a single-wavelength
excitation only produces superimposed color images. Upconversion emission,
with high-purity and tunable chromatic colors, has been achieved through
the use of multilayered core–shell nanocrystals, in which the
color response is ultrasensitive to the excitation wavelength and
pulse frequency or duration.[8,102] As demonstrated by
Huang and co-workers, the information on a printed document can be
encrypted and decoded using pulse duration-sensitive NaYF4/Er@NaYF4 nanoparticles (Figure f). The pumping power-dependent modulation
of emission color profiles could also be used as a convenient decoding
method (Figure g).[103] By probing the kinetics of the upconversion
luminescence, Zhang and co-workers demonstrated that phase angle control
by tuning the luminescence rise and decay time could be used as another
encoding modality for anticounterfeiting use (Figure h).[104]In
2014, Jin and co-workers discovered that the lifetime of upconversion
nanoparticles could be tuned from the microsecond to millisecond range
(25.6 μs to 0.66 ms) by changing the dopant concentration.[105] The substantial change in lifetime was dictated
by the concentration-induced variation in the ionic distance. Upon
decoding with a time-gated microscope, lifetime-dependent patterns
could be generated, as illustrated in Figure i. Recently, a platform combining color and
lifetime modalities has been shown to be effective in enriching the
capacities of upconversion nanoparticles for high-end encryption applications
(Figure j).[106] In addition to lanthanides, transition metal
ions such as Mn2+featuring a long-lived emission decay,
have been used for lifetime-based anticounterfeiting as well.[107] Considering that the emission lifetime of Mn2+ (39 ms) is 2 orders of magnitude longer than that of the
lanthanides (0.6 ms), the emission is clearly distinguishable even
by the naked eye without the need for any time-gated microscopy (Figure k).It is important
to note that the emission profile of the lanthanides
could change in response to variation in temperature,[55,108] which makes the combination of upconversion nanoparticles and temperature
control another viable approach for anticounterfeiting technology.
Despite the enormous potential of upconversion nanoparticles for practical
security applications, the process of decoding optically encrypted
patterns could be a tedious task, particularly in regard to multilevel
information decoding. Another practical limitation that also carries
a major risk to upconversion-based anticounterfeiting is the requirement
of strong coherent lasers with a high pumping power (>10 W/cm2) for attaining visible emission.
Conclusions
and Outlook
The combination of advanced nanotechnology and
upconversion nanoparticles
allows access to various emerging applications by harnessing the distinctive
features of the upconversion luminescence. Although only four types
of emerging applications are covered in this review, they provide
the basis for new areas of research. For example, upconversion-mediated
fluorescence emission difference microscopy[109] and NIR emission saturation nanoscopy[110] have also been developed as advanced super-resolution techniques
for deep-tissue imaging. Notably, upconversion nanocrystal-associated
applications are not absolutely isolated, and their combination would
enable more functions and different capabilities that certainly cannot
be achieved using any of these techniques alone. Combining STED microscopy
with optogenetic tools may become extremely useful in the dynamic
monitoring of neuronal activities in living cells or even in vivo
with unprecedented precision.The aforementioned applications
take advantage of the upconversion
nanophenomena enabled by editing nonradiative energy transfer within
nanostructured materials. In the meantime, radiative energy transfer,
in which the emission of the sensitizer is reabsorbed by the activator,
could also enrich the utility of upconversion nanomaterials toward
energy harvesting such as upconversion-coupled photovoltaics.[111−113] By serving as a spectral converter, upconversion nanomaterials can
largely minimize the nonabsorption of sub-bandgap photons when incorporated
into solar cells in the form of particles or films. Most recently,
upconversion-mediated perovskite photovoltaics has attracted intense
research interests largely due to the large absorption coefficients
and high photoluminescence quantum yields of the perovskite materials.[98,114,115] Given the noncoherent radiation
nature of the sunlight, achieving efficient upconversion in these
systems at low-power irradiance could pose a substantial challenge.
To this end, the use of optical concentrators, plasmonic materials,
or advanced photonic structures may provide a feasible solution.[41,116,117]Despite the many proofs-of-concepts
that have been demonstrated,
the low conversion efficiency inherent to upconversion nanoparticles
continues to prevent their practical utility. In that respect, it
is essential to conduct a comprehensive mechanistic investigation
of rudimentary upconversion processes, including excitation absorption,
energy transfer, and excited state dynamics. Among them, energy transfer
within the lattice of the nanoparticles is perhaps the least explored
front. For instance, the energy transfer between a lanthanidedonor
and an acceptor is generally realized in the form of a dipole–dipole
interaction, which is an essential component of the Föster
resonance energy transfer (FRET) process. However, cross-interrogation
using theoretical and experimental tools suggests that quadruple-quadruple
interaction dominates the process of energy transfer, while the exchange
mechanism prevails when the donor and acceptor are placed in close
proximity.[118] A recently published review
article also notes misconceptions and incorrect treatments in estimating
the rate of energy transfer.[119] More importantly,
the presence of defects significantly complicates the characterization
of the energy transfer process. Given the high sensitivity of the
acoustic response of defects, the picosecond acoustics-associated
method might be useful for probing the spatial distribution of defects
and for monitoring the dynamic processes of defect diffusion at the
nanoscale.[120]As a complementary
tool to theoretical and experimental approaches,
computational simulations provide an additional means to probe the
physical and chemical properties of materials at different temporal
and spatial scales. Two representative methods are density functional
theory and molecular dynamics, which can provide detailed electronic
and statistical information. Density functional theory has found various
applications in many disciplines by providing accurate ground state
electronic structures, which allow us to retrieve the properties of
a given material, such as the band gap, orbital alignment, magnetic
momentum, and conductivity. Furthermore, high-throughput screening
for specific materials can be realized by effectively linking the
identity of a material with its specific behavior.[121] Molecular dynamic simulation has been widely employed to
study the dynamic and thermodynamic behaviors of nanoparticles.[122,123] These simulations provide a platform with high temporal and spatial
precision to retrieve information at the atomic level, which current
experimental techniques cannot access. However, the highly localized
nature of the f orbitals greatly limits the use of such simulation
tools to probe the luminescence properties of lanthanides. Therefore,
advances in computational algorithms could potentially help identify
key factors that dictate the energy transfer pathways and thus facilitate
the development of high-efficiency upconversion nanoparticles.
Authors: Angel Fernandez-Bravo; Kaiyuan Yao; Edward S Barnard; Nicholas J Borys; Elizabeth S Levy; Bining Tian; Cheryl A Tajon; Luca Moretti; M Virginia Altoe; Shaul Aloni; Kenes Beketayev; Francesco Scotognella; Bruce E Cohen; Emory M Chan; P James Schuck Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Carlos D S Brites; Xiaoji Xie; Mengistie L Debasu; Xian Qin; Runfeng Chen; Wei Huang; João Rocha; Xiaogang Liu; Luís D Carlos Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Wilfried Gjhm van Sark; Jessica de Wild; Jatin K Rath; Andries Meijerink; Ruud Ei Schropp Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 4.703
Authors: Uliana Kostiv; Hana Engstová; Bartosz Krajnik; Miroslav Šlouf; Vladimír Proks; Artur Podhorodecki; Petr Ježek; Daniel Horák Journal: Front Chem Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 5.221