Aurora E Clark1,2,3. 1. Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, United States. 2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, United States. 3. The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, United States.
Amphiphilic self-assembly leads to the formation
of complex, structured
fluids whose physicochemical properties can be tuned by the composition
and morphological distributions of the assembled species. The generally
weak energetic attractions between amphiphilic molecules lead to a
large chemical space of structural diversity—an ensemble of
species dynamically evolving in time and where specific assemblies
may have unique behavior. This attribute supports the ubiquity of
these fluids within industry (for example, solvent extraction or cleaning
detergents) and basic science (for example, the study of liquid interfaces,
shear-induced thinning of emulsions, and the synthesis of nanoparticles).The thought-provoking work of Motokawa et al.[1] addresses the historically intriguing and unfolding story
of the self-assembly ensemble within the dense-structured fluids that
underpin solvent extraction (also called liquid–liquid extraction,
LLE). As one of the most industrially important separation methods,
LLE is generally performed under conditions where the concentration
of extracted species approaches the saturation limit. Discrete molecular-scale
complexes are observed to undergo supramolecular assembly, where below
the critical concentration, they may be transported to the organic
phase. At higher concentrations, a dense phase begins to form at the
oil:water phase boundary followed by phase separation.[2,3] Such third phase formation, and the subsequent efficacy of the separation,
is exquisitely sensitive to the exact type and concentration of the
amphiphilic extractant introduced to the organic phase, the organic
solvent itself, and of the solutes (e.g., metal and inorganic acid)
in the aqueous phase.[4−7]For many years, the significance of the self-assembly ensemble
within both the organic and third phase has not been fully appreciated.[7] Drawing inspiration from the soft-matter and
colloidal communities (and based upon data from small angle neutron
scattering, SANS), many studies have interpreted scattering profiles
of the third phase using a chemical model consisting of a homogeneous
microemulsion of reverse micelles that interact using a simplified
interparticle potential like the Baxter Sticky Sphere model (a square
well).[8] The pervasiveness of this micellar
model derives from the apparent generality of its ability to describe
third phase formation as a phase transition approached by intermicelle
attraction energies reaching a value of ∼2KBT (where KB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the critical
temperature).However, such simplicity
lies contrary to the energetic landscape
of amphiphilic self-assembly, a highly dimensional space with a nuanced
interplay between enthalpic and entropic contributions (Figure ). In recent years the essence
of the self-assembly ensemble has begun to emerge. Studies have proposed
that, in addition to potential micellar species, there may be percolating
networks of clusters of varying length scales and complexity, and
that the total fluid may be highly heterogeneous.[10−12]
Figure 1
Imagining the free energy landscape of the self-assembly
ensemble.
Reprinted with permission from refs (1) and (9). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. Copyright 2012
Springer Nature.
Imagining the free energy landscape of the self-assembly
ensemble.
Reprinted with permission from refs (1) and (9). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. Copyright 2012
Springer Nature.With
this perspective in mind, the work of Motokawa et al.[1] is a significant step forward in understanding
the structural hierarchy of the self-assembly ensemble, as well as
the underlying intermolecular interactions that tune its distribution.
The authors focus upon a nonradioactive analogue of the postextraction
organic phase within the plutonium uranium redox extraction (PUREX)
process.[13] PUREX is used to separate high-
and low-level radioactive components of spent nuclear fuel; however
its general process is quite similar to metal purification strategies
found within hydrometallurgy and recycling. Multimodal characterization
of the fluid, composed of Zr(NO3)4-HNO3/TBP-n-octane-d18, utilized
X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) alongside density functional
theory (DFT) calculations, to elucidate the local geometry of the
Zr(NO3)4(TBP)2 complexes that are
generally assumed to be the idealized end-products of solvent extraction
at conditions well below the critical concentration. However, importantly,
the longer length-scale fluid structure was also probed with SANS
complemented by molecular dynamics simulations. Crucially, a concentration
dependent series was examined, and as such, the change to both local
and extended structural organization was able to be elucidated as
the critical concentration was approached in the organic phase.From this well-designed series, it was observed that the molecular
Zr(NO3)4(TBP)2 acts as a building block
for larger primary clusters, that in turn may further self-assemble
into superclusters (Figure ). Within conditions that have the Zr(NO3)4(TBP)2 and the primary clusters as the major components
of the ensemble, large intermolecular interactions driven by electrostatic
forces are implied, which leads to significant nonideality of the
fluid as a whole. While the electrostatic interactions appear to drive
formation of the primary clusters, diluent solvation appears to contribute
to the cluster size and morphology distribution. The distribution
of the primary clusters within the fluid is also heterogeneous, where
loose assemblies are observed and proposed to be precursors to supercluster
formation. Furthermore, the study implies that phase splitting may
be driven by changes to the ensemble such that the superclusters become
the primary species.As may be anticipated, the hierarchical
detail of the self-assembly
ensemble as a function of solution conditions now provides an improved
platform to connect the micro- and mesoscopic fluid structure with
phase behavior. The community is encouraged to pursue quantitative
relationships between the size and shape of the ensemble and its sensitivity
to specific solution conditions (Figure ). Recognizing that under different solution
composition there may be different forces that drive self-assembly,
and the specific types of assemblages, is absolutely essential toward
developing a truly general set of chemical principles the underpin
structured fluids. Indeed, one may consider that it is a grand challenge
to predict the energetic landscape that underlies the chemical space
of structures available to structured fluids so that one day they
may be precisely tailored.
Figure 2
Illustration
of potential self-assembly ensemble with relevant
future areas of study highlighted in red. Reprinted with permission
from ref (1). Copyright
2018 American Chemical Society.
Illustration
of potential self-assembly ensemble with relevant
future areas of study highlighted in red. Reprinted with permission
from ref (1). Copyright
2018 American Chemical Society.There is also great opportunity in the development of theories
that impart molecular-scale information to the fluid dynamics treatment
of such systems. Consider, too, the advancement of chemically informed
models of phase transitions, for example, the incorporation of the
self-assembly ensemble and its associated range of interparticle interactions,
within the context of critical phenomena.[14] Already the current work has indicated that a chemical analogous
to a gas–liquid transition may not be an appropriate model
for phase separation within these systems.Finally, as a necessary
counterpart to the thermodynamic equilibrium
study described here, it is also relevant to have a mechanistic understanding
of how such assemblies form. In practical solvent extractions, it
is intuitive that the liquid interface, with its own captivating structural
and dynamic complexity,[15,16] may play a very important
role in assisting self-assembly. For example, one could envision that
the initial stages of the building block to primary cluster formation
are facilitated by the time dependent evolution of the capillary wave
structure of the interface, or that the surfactant laden surface helps
template intermediate structures that in turn have decreased barriers
to form larger structural architectures. Moreover, it is well-known
that, under some operating conditions, thermodynamic equilibrium may
in fact not be achieved, and thus metastable self-assembled species
may be critical to phase behavior.Each of these important future
areas of study will benefit greatly
from the telescoping view of the self-assembly ensemble provided by
the current work.
Authors: Renato Chiarizia; Mark P Jensen; Paul G Rickert; Zdenek Kolarik; Marian Borkowski; Pappanan Thiyagarajan Journal: Langmuir Date: 2004-12-07 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Ryuhei Motokawa; Tohru Kobayashi; Hitoshi Endo; Junju Mu; Christopher D Williams; Andrew J Masters; Mark R Antonio; William T Heller; Michihiro Nagao Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 14.553
Authors: Daniel Massey; Andrew Masters; Jonathan Macdonald-Taylor; David Woodhead; Robin Taylor Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.466