Literature DB >> 30693259

Ameloblastoma: Reconstruction Using Titanium Plates adapted Using Stereolithographic Models.

Mariano Sebastian Chutchurru1, Maria Isabel Brusca1, Roberto Palavecino1.   

Abstract

Ameloblastoma is a benign but locally invasive odontogenic tumor that causes significant morbidity. The aim is to study an ameloblastoma treatment with reconstruction using titanium plates adapted using stereolithographic models. A 48-year-old female patient referred due to asymptomatic osteolytic lesion between teeth 47 and 48 discovered during routine radiographic study. The pathoanatomical study described a desmoplastic ameloblastoma. Due to the possibility of it being a malignant lesion, a computerized axial tomography scan was performed, which showed that the tumor was not malignant. A stereolithographic model was prepared to make the cutting guides and facilitate fitting of reconstruction plates. Three-dimensional printing technology enables fast, accurate mandibular reconstruction, helping to shorten operation time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ameloblastoma; stereolithographic models; titanium plates

Year:  2018        PMID: 30693259      PMCID: PMC6327792          DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_196_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 2231-0746


INTRODUCTION

Ameloblastoma is a mainly benign but locally invasive odontogenic tumor that causes significant morbidity. Odontogenic tumors are a group of heterogeneous lesions derived from the epithelial tissue, the ectomesenchyme, or both, which are part of the tooth-forming apparatus. Several retrospective studies in different continents report differences related to the frequency of the different histological types of tumors.[1] Clinical-radiographic and pathoanatomical diagnoses must be considered. A panoramic radiograph can be used to determine the location of the lesion, presence of sclerosis in the periphery, association with impacted teeth, and expansion of cortical bone of the lower mandibular edge. Ameloblastomas are rare neoplasms and seem to present variations according to location and patient sex and age. Clinical features and images are useful for determining the most probable differential diagnosis before performing the biopsy. The frequency and incidence of odontogenic cysts and tumors are a matter of controversy, and reports vary according to the geographic location where they are studied. Ameloblastomas have great clinical and histopathological diversity and reflect a need for epidemiological profile to be considered when they are studied.[2] A computerized tomography scan is the most precise method for determining lesion shape, root resorption, calcifications, buccolingual expansion, and breakage of cortical bone. Although most ameloblastomas and keratocysts both present buccolingual expansion and bone cortex erosion, one of the differences between them is that usually only ameloblastomas present root resorption.[34]

Aim

The aim is to study a clinical case of ameloblastoma treatment with reconstruction using titanium plates adapted using stereolithographic models.

CASE REPORT

A 48-year-old female patient referred by general dentist due to asymptomatic osteolytic lesion between teeth 47 and 48 discovered during a routine radiographic study. She was received at the hospital's surgery department, where it was decided to extract tooth 47 and take a sample from the lesion (partial biopsy) [Figures 1 and 2].
Figure 1

Intraoperative view

Figure 2

Preoperative radiography

Intraoperative view Preoperative radiography The pathoanatomical study described a desmoplastic ameloblastoma. Due to the possibility of it being a malignant lesion, a computerized axial tomography scan was performed, which showed that the tumor was not malignant. Conventional presurgical tests were ordered to perform en bloc resection with safety margins. A stereolithographic model was prepared to make the cutting guides and facilitate fitting of reconstruction plates [Figures 3 and 4].
Figure 3

Resected specimen

Figure 4

Stereolithographic model

Resected specimen Stereolithographic model The patient was taken to the operating room under general anesthesia and nasotracheal intubation. Cutting guides were placed and en bloc resection performed, which included teeth 48 and 46 and an ameloblastic lesion measuring 0.8 cm × 0.4 cm × 0.4 cm with marked sclerosis and reactional bone neoformation. A 2.4 system plate for basal reconstruction and a 2.0 system locking plate were placed. While adapting the plates, the occlusion must be checked using IMF screws. The patient spent the 1st h in intensive care, after which she was moved to the general ward, released from hospital, and attended outpatient checkups [Figures 5–11].
Figure 5

Computed tomography

Figure 11

Plate placed

Computed tomography Three-dimensional computed tomography En bloc resection of ameloblastic section of mandible Histopathology Extracted sample Incision during surgery Plate placed During postsurgical checkups, the patient presented trismus, which was treated with myofunctional therapy. Follow-up showed good evolution and good functionality of the jaw, without esthetic sequels or tumor recurrence [Figure 12 and 13].
Figure 12

Post 10 days of surgery

Figure 13

Post 12 months of surgery

Post 10 days of surgery Post 12 months of surgery

DISCUSSION

Epidemiological studies of odontogenic tumors performed in different parts of the world have reported different incidence and distribution patterns. Desmoplastic ameloblastoma is a unique variant with peculiar clinical, radiographic, and pathoanatomical characteristics. Pathohistological characteristics include extensive stromal desmoplasia and small tumor nests of odontogenic epithelium scattered in the stroma. From these findings, differential diagnosis is required to distinguish ameloblastic fibroma, odontogenic fibroma, and squamous odontogenic tumor.[5] Bhagwat et al. report that ameloblastomas were the second most common benign tumors (35.43%), followed by odontoma (7.08%). In contrast, in India, the most frequent was ameloblastoma (49%), followed by keratinizing cystic odontogenic tumor (32%) and odontoma (6.2%).[6] Ameloblastomas showed a high prevalence in the jaw (82.22%), in particular the posterior zone, in agreement with the case presented herein.[1] Ameloblastoma growth is aggressive but slow, so it can take many years until the patient decides to visit the dentist, which makes treatment more complicated due to the size of the tumor.[6] Tumor growth characteristics have been classified into two main types: expansive and invasive. Ameloblastoma is the most controversial jaw tumor because there is a greater diversity of opinion concerning the clinical behavior, treatment, and malignant potential of this tumor than any other neoplasms found elsewhere in the body.[7] Petrovic et al. suggested that favorable outcomes were associated with the administration of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy for patients with positive margins and a repeat resection for patients with recurrences. Complete excision with negative margins, however, remains the gold standard for curative treatment.[8] Another treatment could be marsupialization, and it is effective in reducing tumor size for both unicystic ameloblastoma and multicystic ameloblastoma. Marsupialization plus second-stage curettage is recommended as the primary treatment for mandibular cystic ameloblastoma.[910] The conventional one is the same we reported, but the originality in this case is the use of new protocols for mandibular reconstruction using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing for custom-made cutting guides and titanium plates, or adaptation of standard plates provides a viable method for replicating the patient's anatomical contour. They give surgeons better control of the procedure and shorten surgical procedure time, since the reconstruction plate does not need to be contoured during surgery. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies provide prefabricated stereolithographic models.[1112] In the current clinical case, we present mandibular reconstruction after excising the tumor, using titanium plates adapted on stereolithographic models. 3D printing technology enables fast, accurate mandibular reconstruction, helping to shorten operation time (and therefore decreases exposure time to general anesthesia, decreases blood loss, and reduces wound exposure time, thereby reducing the likelihood of potential infection), and makes the surgical procedure easier.[12]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  12 in total

1.  Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology.

Authors:  Adir Cohen; Amir Laviv; Phillip Berman; Rizan Nashef; Jawad Abu-Tair
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-08-28

Review 2.  Clinicopathological characteristics of desmoplastic ameloblastoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rahul Anand; Gargi S Sarode; Sachin C Sarode; Mamatha Reddy; Hemant V Unadkat; Shazia Mushtaq; Revati Deshmukh; Shakira Choudhary; Nitin Gupta; Anjali P Ganjre; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  J Investig Clin Dent       Date:  2017-07-14

3.  Prevalence of odontogenic lesions among the Kanpur population: an institutional study.

Authors:  Amrita Raj; Gayathri Ramesh; Ramesh Nagarajappa; Amit Pandey; Ankita Raj
Journal:  J Exp Ther Oncol       Date:  2017-05

4.  Marsupialization of mandibular cystic ameloblastoma: Retrospective study of 7 years.

Authors:  Zinan Yang; Qian Liang; Le Yang; Guang-Sen Zheng; Si-En Zhang; Xiao-Mei Lao; Yu-Jie Liang; Gui-Qing Liao
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Prosthetically guided maxillofacial surgery: evaluation of the accuracy of a surgical guide and custom-made bone plate in oncology patients after mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Simona Mazzoni; Claudio Marchetti; Rossella Sgarzani; Riccardo Cipriani; Roberto Scotti; Leonardo Ciocca
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Epidemiological study of odontogenic tumours: An institutional experience.

Authors:  Govind R K Nalabolu; Arif Mohiddin; Santhosh K S Hiremath; Ravikanth Manyam; T Sreenivasa Bharath; P Ramanjaneya Raju
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  "Evaluation of safety margin" in ameloblastoma of the mandible by surgical, radiological, and histopathological methods: An evidence-based study.

Authors:  S Kalaiselvan; A V Dharmesh Kumar Raja; B Saravanan; A Srivel Vigneswari; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016-10

8.  The Epidemiology, treatment, and complication of ameloblastoma in East-Indonesia: 6 years retrospective study.

Authors:  M Ruslin; F-N Hendra; A Vojdani; D Hardjosantoso; M Gazali; A Tajrin; J Wolff; T Forouzanfar
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-01-01

9.  Odontogenic tumors: Review of 127 cases in Marathwada region of Maharashtra.

Authors:  Atul Bhagwat; S R Barpande; J D Bhavthankar; M S Mandale; Jayanti Humbe; Preeti Singh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2017 Sep-Dec

10.  Expression of TP53 and IL-1α in unicystic ameloblastoma predicts the efficacy of marsupialization treatment.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Liu Liu; Xi Yang; Lizhen Wang; Chenping Zhang; Yongjie Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  1 in total

1.  Creating patient-specific anatomical models for 3D printing and AR/VR: a supplement for the 2018 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) hands-on course.

Authors:  Nicole Wake; Amy E Alexander; Andy M Christensen; Peter C Liacouras; Maureen Schickel; Todd Pietila; Jane Matsumoto
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2019-12-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.