Literature DB >> 30693155

Development and characterization of EST-SSR markers for Vitex negundo var. heterophylla (Lamiaceae).

Lele Liu1, Jingwen Wang1, Meiqi Yin1, Xiao Guo2, Yunfei Cai3, Ning Du1, Xiaona Yu1, Weihua Guo1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Vitex negundo var. heterophylla (Lamiaceae) is a dominant shrub in the warm temperate zone of northern China. Expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) markers were developed to investigate its genetic diversity and structure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We detected 12,075 SSRs in V. negundo var. heterophylla using transcriptome sequencing. Primer pairs for 100 SSR loci were designed and amplified in three populations of V. negundo var. heterophylla. Sixty loci were amplified, of which 14 were polymorphic. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 15, and levels of observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.241 to 0.828 and from 0.426 to 0.873, respectively. All primer pairs amplified PCR products from V. rotundifolia but only four of them amplified products from Leonurus japonicus.
CONCLUSIONS: The identified EST-SSR markers will be useful for future molecular and reproductive ecology studies of V. negundo var. heterophylla and V. rotundifolia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lamiaceae; Vitex negundo var. heterophylla; Vitex rotundifolia; expressed sequence tag–simple sequence repeat (EST‐SSR) markers; transcriptome sequencing

Year:  2019        PMID: 30693155      PMCID: PMC6342176          DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Vitex negundo L. var. heterophylla (Franch.) Rehder (Lamiaceae) is a deciduous shrub species that is widely distributed in the hilly areas of northern China. It exhibits a range of morphological and physiological adaptations to abiotic environmental factors, such as water and light regimes (Du et al., 2010, 2012, 2017), that are under the control of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms (Liu et al., 2018). This has allowed colonization of a broad range of habitats, including woodland, bush, and roadsides. Only a few genetic studies of V. negundo have been reported, and these have been based on random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Su et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2007) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers (Liu et al., 2018). Notably, no studies using codominant genetic markers are currently available. In V. rotundifolia L. f. (Lamiaceae), an endangered coastal species, genomic simple sequence repeat (gSSR) markers have been reported (Ohtsuki et al., 2014). Here, we sequenced the transcriptome and developed expressed sequence tag–SSR (EST‐SSR) markers for V. negundo var. heterophylla. These markers will be useful for further reproductive and evolutionary ecology studies of V. negundo var. heterophylla and can also provide information for revegetation and management programs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two V. negundo var. heterophylla individuals were sampled for transcriptome sequencing from Fohui Mountain in Jinan, Shandong Province, China (Appendix 1). RNA was extracted from collected leaves using the RNAprep Pure Plant kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China), and mRNA was isolated from total RNA using the NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA). After ultrasonic fragmentation, mRNA was converted to double‐stranded cDNA using the same kit. Purification and size selection were conducted using AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA). Finally, DNA fragments of approximately 400 bp in length were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). The raw data were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (accession no. PRJNA491662). The raw sequences were filtered by removing adapters and low‐quality reads (quality score < 30), resulting in 45.568 and 43.082 million clean reads, from the two libraries, respectively. These reads were de novo assembled using Trinity (Grabherr et al., 2011) into 52,072 unigenes, with an N50 length of 1414 bp. The putative functions of EST‐SSR sequences were determined by BLASTX against the NCBI non‐redundant protein (nr) database. We detected 12,075 SSR loci from these unigenes using MISA (Thiel et al., 2003), consisting of 4242 mononucleotide SSRs and 7833 di‐, tri‐, tetra‐, penta‐, and hexanucleotide SSRs. Primers were designed using Primer3 (Untergasser et al., 2012). Fresh leaves were collected from three populations of V. negundo var. heterophylla in Shandong Province, China (Appendix 1), and genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaf tissue using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). Initially, we used 100 primer pairs with high dinucleotide or trinucleotide repeat motifs to amplify products from six individuals belonging to three populations. PCR amplification was performed in a final volume of 20 μL, containing 3 ng of template DNA, 2 μL of 10× buffer (with Mg2+; Tiangen), 1 μL of dNTPs (2.5 mM each), 1 μL of each primer (5 μM), and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Tiangen). The PCR program consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at an appropriate temperature for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 45 s; followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min and 65°C for 30 s. The PCR products were fractionated by electrophoresis using both 2% agarose gels and 6% polyacrylamide gels with a 1‐kbp DNA Ladder Marker (Tiangen) as a reference. In total, 52 primer pairs amplified detectable products, of which 14 pairs showed polymorphism among the six tested samples (Table 1; see monomorphic loci in Appendix 2). The putative functions of EST‐SSR sequences were determined by BLASTX against the NCBI nr database.
Table 1

Characteristics of 14 polymorphic EST‐SSR markers developed for Vitex negundo var. heterophylla

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motif T a (°C)Expected allele size (bp)Allele size range (bp)Putative function [Organism] E‐valueGenBank accession no.
V02F: AGCAGGGAGAGGAAGAGGAG(TGG)13 58172156–187No hit MH825839
R: ACCAACCCCACTCAGCTAGA
V07F: CCTCTGCTGCGCATGTCTAT(AG)16 56125107–133Serine hydroxymethyltransferase, mitochondrial [Erythranthe guttatus]8.90E‐114 MH825840
R: TAAGGGGCTTGCCAATGGAG
V15F: CAACAGAGAGGGCGTCAAGT(AT)6 56220206–237No hit MH825841
R: GGGGAGTGTCGAAGTGGAAG
V25F: ACAGCAGCCATTCAGACTGT(GT)16 58236207–253No hit MH825842
R: CGTTGCATTCGGCCATTCAA
V30F: GCAAGGCGAAGAATACAGCG(TGC)5 56191189–205ABC transporter G family member 11 [Sesamum indicum]6.20E‐172 MH825843
G: GTCGGGAGGGACTGAGTAGT
V49F: CCGTTCGCTGTTGCTTGTAC(AG)14 56215200–242No hit MH825844
R: CCTCAGCAGTTTGGACGTCT
V55F: GCAAGCTCCTCCTTCCTTGA(CTC)10 56198276–206Probable protein S‐acyltransferase 12 isoform X3 [Sesamum indicum]6.90E‐99 MH825845
R: ACCGAGGAAGTTGAGTGCAG
V59F: AGCTGAATGGCAACCTTCGA(GAT)7 56238224–237Intracellular protein transport protein USO1‐like [Sesamum indicum]8.80E‐78 MH825846
R: ACGAGGTCCTCTAGTGCCTT
V70F: TGTTGGCCGATCAGCTGATT(GCT)7 56144133–153Hypothetical protein MIMGU_mgv1a000263mg [Erythranthe guttata]1.00E‐146 MH825847
R: GCAGCAGCCTTCCATTATGC
V76F: TGACGCTCTCGATCCAACTT(AG)15 5612194–128Uncharacterized protein At4g26450 [Sesamum indicum]5.50E‐52 MH825848
R: GCCTTGGCCATCATTTCAGC
V95F: CGAGTATACGCAGGCGAACT(GCC)7 56253242–266Zinc finger protein 8 [Erythranthe guttatus]6.10E‐13 MH825849
R: GCTTGGCTGATGCACATGTT
V97F: GTCACCACTCACCGGCAATA(CA)12 56229211–239Uncharacterized protein LOC105175071 [Sesamum indicum]2.90E‐40 MH825850
R: GGCGCGTCATGGTATAAGGA
V99F: ACGACGAGCTCGAACATGAA(GTG)8 56161155–173Transcription factor bHLH63 [Sesamum indicum]5.50E‐52 MH825851
R: GATACGCAGCAGCAGAGGAT
V100F: CTGCCACCACCTCCATTTCT(CAA)8 56220211–235 d‐3‐phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase 2, chloroplastic‐like [Sesamum indicum]1.20E‐293 MH825852
R: TCGGAATCCTTCACCAGCAC

T a = annealing temperature.

Characteristics of 14 polymorphic EST‐SSR markers developed for Vitex negundo var. heterophylla T a = annealing temperature. The 14 primer pairs were then used with all 83 samples from the three populations to evaluate the overall level of polymorphism. The forward primers were 5′ end‐labeled with FAM dye, and final products were fractionated using an ABI 3730XL DNA capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) with a LIZ 500 Internal Size standard (Applied Biosystems). GenAlEx version 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012) was used to calculate the number of alleles, observed heterozygosity, and expected heterozygosity for each locus. GENEPOP software (version 4.7.0; Rousset, 2008) was used to investigate linkage disequilibrium and to determine deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 15, the levels of observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.241 to 0.828, and the levels of expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.426 to 0.873 (Table 2). Significant linkage disequilibrium was detected between loci V15 and V30 (P = 0.0109) and loci V25 and V70 (P = 0.0266). Loci V97 and V100 showed significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in two populations (P < 0.001; Table 2).
Table 2

Genetic variation in the 14 polymorphic EST‐SSR markers in three Vitex negundo var. heterophylla populations.*

LocusPopulation A (n = 29)Population B (n = 28)Population C (n = 26)
A H o H e A H o H e A H o H e
V0270.6550.74680.7860.81590.6920.844
V0770.7590.80470.7140.75180.6920.834
V1570.5360.57380.5000.67060.6150.698
V25150.8280.873120.7140.865130.6920.719
V3040.6550.62450.5000.46650.5770.679
V49100.5860.757100.7140.836110.5380.771
V5570.7590.68790.7140.73370.5380.562
V5930.6210.54030.5000.51730.5380.514
V7060.8280.71980.7140.74660.7310.724
V76120.6900.699110.7860.81180.6150.754
V9560.3790.47970.6430.629100.5000.509
V9780.3450.717a 90.3930.790a 80.3850.798
V9940.2410.45650.5360.57320.3850.426
V10080.7240.744a 60.3570.651a 80.5000.743

A = number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = sample size.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001).

Genetic variation in the 14 polymorphic EST‐SSR markers in three Vitex negundo var. heterophylla populations.* A = number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = sample size. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001). To test the transferability of the 14 primers between taxa, they were used with DNA samples from V. rotundifolia and Leonurus japonicus Houtt. (Lamiaceae). All primer pairs successfully amplified products from V. rotundifolia, but only four primer pairs amplified products from some L. japonicus individuals (Table 3).
Table 3

Cross‐amplification of 14 polymorphic EST‐SSR markers developed for Vitex negundo var. heterophylla in V. rotundifolia and Leonurus japonicus.a

Locus Vitex rotundifolia (n = 13)b Leonurus japonicus (n = 8)
V02169, 172, 175, 187
V07117, 123
V15208, 233*
V25225, 227, 229* *
V30191, 193, 195
V49200, 210, 214
V55176, 179, 185
V59224, 234, 237
V70140, 149
V76110, 112, 122, 128 *
V95245, 248, 254 *
V97211, 221, 223, 227* *
V99167, 170, 173
V100211, 214, 217, 220, 226, 229

= primers amplified products in some individuals; — = primers did not amplify in any of the individuals; n = number of individuals.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Numbers represent the PCR product size.

Cross‐amplification of 14 polymorphic EST‐SSR markers developed for Vitex negundo var. heterophylla in V. rotundifolia and Leonurus japonicus.a = primers amplified products in some individuals; — = primers did not amplify in any of the individuals; n = number of individuals. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Numbers represent the PCR product size.

CONCLUSIONS

We assembled 52,072 unigenes of V. negundo var. heterophylla following transcriptome sequencing and used this data set to develop 14 novel polymorphic EST‐SSR primer pairs. All of these primers amplified products in the related species V. rotundifolia. These markers represent a useful resource for reproductive and genetic ecology studies of this species and may provide a valuable tool for revegetation and management in northern China.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

W.G., L.L., and Y.C. conceived and designed the experiments. L.L., J.W., M.Y., X.G., X.Y., and N.D. contributed to sample collection. L.L. and J.W. performed the molecular laboratory work. L.L., J.W., M.Y., and Y.C. participated in data pre‐processing. L.L., Y.C., N.D., X.Y., and W.G. analyzed the data. L.L. drafted the manuscript and all authors participated in manuscript modifications and gave final approval for publication.

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

All sequence information was uploaded to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (accession no. PRJNA491662); primer sequences were uploaded to GenBank (accession no. MH825839–MH825852 and MH892533–MH892570; Table 1 and Appendix 2).
SpeciesPopulation N Collection localitya Geographic coordinatesVoucher specimenb
Vitex negundo L. var. heterophylla (Franch.) RehderA29Fanggan36.4317°N, 117.4516°E01611001
Vitex negundo var. heterophylla B28Mengshan35.5376°N, 117.9895°E01611002
Vitex negundo var. heterophylla C26Yaoxiang36.3213°N, 117.1200°E01611003
Vitex negundo var. heterophylla 2Jinan36.6317°N, 117.0347°E01709001c01709002d
Vitex rotundifolia L. f.13Muping37.4574°N, 121.6826°E01801001
Leonurus japonicus Houtt.8Jinan36.7239°N, 117.0207°E01801002

Collection localities are in Shandong Province, China.

All voucher specimens were collected by Lelel Liu and are deposited in the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University (JSPC), Qingdao, China. The sample with irregularly pinnatifid leaflets (c) and the sample with slightly incised leaflets (d) were used for transcriptome sequencing.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motif T a (°C)Allele size (bp)Putative function [Organism] E‐valueGenBank accession no.
V3F: CGATGATGCCCCCACTAGTC(TC)15 56150Unnamed protein product [Coffea canephora]2.80E‐17 MH892533
R: TCCGCAGATGGCCTGTTATC
V4F: TCTCTCTTCTCTCCTCCGCC(CAA)6 56207Uncharacterized protein LOC105175754 [Sesamum indicum]1.50E‐60 MH892534
R: GGGTCTTCGGAAATGGGGTT
V8F: ACGCGAACCTGTGAAGATGT(CT)12 56171Hypothetical protein M569_03371, partial [Genlisea aurea]2.50E‐56 MH892535
R: GAAACAAGGAAGCGACGCTC
V11F: TGATGCCATGGTAGCAACGA(AAG)9 56248G‐type lectin S‐receptor‐like serine/threonine‐protein kinase At4g27290 [Sesamum indicum]1.20E‐15 MH892536
R: GTTCGAACTTCCCACCGGAT
V13F: TAAGACTCCCACTGCAAGCG(CCA)5 56212Uncharacterized protein LOC105974765 [Erythranthe guttatus]3.20E‐50 MH892537
R: GAATGTGGCAGGTGGATCCA
V18F: GGAACACGTGATTGGGGTTC(TC)16 56193No hit MH892538
R: AGACGGGCGAAAAACTCCAA
V21F: CCGGAAAAAGCAGTAACCGC(CT)13 56209Unnamed protein product [Vitis vinifera]5.10E‐06 MH892539
R: ATCACCAGCAACTGCCATCA
V26F: CAGCAGCCCCAAATTTGCAA(GGC)8 5624126S proteasome subunit RPT2B [Arabidopsis thaliana]5.10E‐06 MH892540
R: GAGCTGGTCCTAATCGGCAA
V27F: AGTCTGTGCCTTGTTGCTGA(TG)11 56243Uncharacterized protein LOC105158430 [Sesamum indicum]2.40E‐65 MH892541
R: ACTTTGCACCCCTCAATCCA
V33F: GACGTCCCCATTCGGAACTC(CT)17 56258No hit MH892542
R: GCTTCTCCACTCGACTGTCA
V36F: TACGCCTATGTTTGTGGCCA(AG)10 56182Pentatricopeptide repeat‐containing protein At5g67570, chloroplastic [Sesamum indicum]7.00E‐118 MH892543
R: TTATGAGCTAGCTCGCTGCC
V41F: CGGCCGGAGCAAGAAGATAT(GA)10 56245Myosin‐14 [Sesamum indicum]2.90E‐127 MH892544
R: CTCTCTTGCCGGAGCTTCAT
V43F: AGCAAGCCGGAATGAATCGA(AAC)7 56221Transcription factor GTE7‐like [Sesamum indicum]1.50E‐111 MH892545
R: TGGACGTCTGGTTGAACGAG
V47F: TGGAAGCCTGTGTTGTGTGA(GA)17 56152Haloacid dehalogenase‐like hydrolase domain‐containing protein SGPP [Erythranthe guttatus]9.90E‐75 MH892546
R: AGTTCCGTCAAGCGAGGAAG
V48F: CCACAAATGCAGCGAGTTCA(CAG)8 56103Unnamed protein product [Coffea canephora]9.90E‐198 MH892547
R: TTCCAGATGCAGGCTGTAGC
V50F: CCACTAATCGCAACAGCAGC(TC)13 56258Phospholipase SGR2‐like isoform X1 [Sesamum indicum]3.60E‐187 MH892548
R: GGTAGCACATGGCCATCAGT
V51F: CCGGTTTGGAGTTTGCCTTG(GGC)7 56165Uncharacterized protein LOC105172005 isoform X1 [Sesamum indicum]2.10E‐83 MH892549
R: AGCACACAGATCACCGATGG
V52F: CCAGCGCAAGACGTACTACT(AG)38 56260Uncharacterized protein LOC105171026 [Sesamum indicum]1.30E‐36 MH892550
R: CTCTCAGCTCGTTGGCAGAA
V53F: AACACCGGCGAGTTGAGTAG(AG)14 56115Hypothetical protein POPTR_0007s12520g [Populus trichocarpa]7.10E‐33 MH892551
R: ACAGTCACAGTGTGGCACAT
V54F: CGCCTCTCACAGTCATACCG(TG)15 56149No hit MH892552
R: CTCAAGTCTCAGCCACGCA
V56F: ACCATTTGCTTCGCATACGC(GGA)7 56135No hit MH892553
R: CACATGGTCGAAGCCTAGCA
V58F: AAGCTGCTGCCACCATTGTA(GTT)7 56269Protein E6‐like [Sesamum indicum]2.00E‐24 MH892554
R: AACAGCTACGGCCTTTACGG
V61F: GGCTCAGAAGGCCAAGACAT(GA)11 56159Galacturonokinase [Sesamum indicum]5.10E‐165 MH892555
R: TCTTCAACGCAACTCCACCA
V63F: CCATGACGTCGGAGGAGATG(AG)11 56275Uncharacterized protein LOC105970868 [Erythranthe guttatus]8.20E‐51 MH892556
R: TCTCGTCCAAACACGCCATT
V64F: ACGACCTGGATTTCGACCAC(AG)11 56168No hit MH892557
R: GCACGCACACACAACACAAT
V66F: TCTTGATCAGCTGCCACCAG(TCA)8 56234Uncharacterized protein LOC105157368 [Sesamum indicum]1.10E‐31 MH892558
R: GAGCTTGGTTAGTGGCGAGA
V71F: CACTCCGACCACTTGAAGCT(TC)13 56162Protein IQ‐DOMAIN 32‐like [Sesamum indicum]5.90E‐60 MH892559
R: GTGAAGCGAGGAGACCAACA
V72F: TCAAGCGGCTCGTATGAGTC(TC)13 56123Uncharacterized protein LOC105170218 [Sesamum indicum]1.30E‐74 MH892560
R: CATCACCGGCGAAACAACTG
V82F: GCAAGAGCCTAGTCGAGCTT(ATG)9 56248RNA exonuclease 3 [Gossypium arboreum]1.90E‐22 MH892561
R: AGTCCATGCCTCCGACAAAT
V83F: TCCACCACCACTCAAAGACG(CT)17 56139Protein GAR2 isoform X1 [Sesamum indicum]7.90E‐98 MH892562
R: CCTGCCAACTCTCATTCCGT
V84F: CAGTGAAGAGCGCAGGAAGA(GCG)8 56183Uncharacterized protein LOC105176253 isoform X1 [Sesamum indicum]2.00E‐253 MH892563
R: CCTCCTCTCGCTTCCATCAC
V88F: TTGGTCCTGCAAGCATAGCA(AG)23 56189No hit MH892564
R: TGCCAACCGGTTCTAAGTCA
V89F: TCGCGTAGTCCAGCTTCTTC(AG)11 56149Reactive oxygen species modulator 1‐like [Sesamum indicum]1.90E‐20 MH892565
R: ATAAACAGCACCAACAGCGC
V90F: ACGAGTCGCCATTGTCGATT(GT)16 56151Probable leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like protein kinase At1g35710 [Sesamum indicum]1.60E‐185 MH892566
R: CGTCTCCAACTCGACTGCTT
V92F: GGAAATCAGTTGCCTTGCCG(AGC)7 56186E3 ubiquitin‐protein ligase RGLG2‐like, partial [Pyrus ×bretschneideri]1.60E‐87 MH892567
R: GCAAGTCATGTGTCCACAGC
V93F: CAAGTAATCGCCGTGAACCG(CGC)7 56251Uncharacterized protein LOC105173283 [Sesamum indicum]6.30E‐51 MH892568
R: ACTTCACTCTGCCGCATCTC
V94F: CGGAGAAAGCCATGCACATG(GAA)8 56226Hypothetical protein MIMGU_MGV1A020013MG [Erythranthe guttata]1.90E‐18 MH892569
R: TCGTATCAGGAGCAGAGCCA
V96F: AGGCACGAAAGCAAGAGTGT(GGC)7 56177Uncharacterized protein LOC105968457 [Erythranthe guttatus]3.80E‐40 MH892570
R: GAGTCGCCTCCTCCAATCTG

T a = annealing temperature.

  9 in total

1.  The Great Wall of China: a physical barrier to gene flow?

Authors:  H Su; L-J Qu; K He; Z Zhang; J Wang; Z Chen; H Gu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux.

Authors:  François Rousset
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.090

3.  Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  T Thiel; W Michalek; R K Varshney; A Graner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-09-14       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces.

Authors:  Andreas Untergasser; Ioana Cutcutache; Triinu Koressaar; Jian Ye; Brant C Faircloth; Maido Remm; Steven G Rozen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Dominance of an alien shrub Rhus typhina over a native shrub Vitex negundo var. heterophylla under variable water supply patterns.

Authors:  Ning Du; Xiangfeng Tan; Qiang Li; Xiao Liu; Wenxin Zhang; Renqing Wang; Jian Liu; Weihua Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic and epigenetic variations associated with adaptation to heterogeneous habitat conditions in a deciduous shrub.

Authors:  Liu Lele; Du Ning; Pei Cuiping; Guo Xiao; Guo Weihua
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome.

Authors:  Manfred G Grabherr; Brian J Haas; Moran Yassour; Joshua Z Levin; Dawn A Thompson; Ido Amit; Xian Adiconis; Lin Fan; Raktima Raychowdhury; Qiandong Zeng; Zehua Chen; Evan Mauceli; Nir Hacohen; Andreas Gnirke; Nicholas Rhind; Federica di Palma; Bruce W Birren; Chad Nusbaum; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Nir Friedman; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Development of microsatellite markers for Vitex rotundifolia (Verbenaceae), an endangered coastal plant in Lake Biwa, Japan.

Authors:  Tatsuo Ohtsuki; Tasuku Shoda; Yuko Kaneko; Hiroaki Setoguchi
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 1.936

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Studies on reproductive strategies of Vitex negundo L. var. heterophylla (Franch.) Rehder (Lamiaceae) based on morphological characteristics and SSR markers.

Authors:  Xiaohan Sun; Feng Wang; Rong Cui; Xiao Liu; Xiangxiang Li; Jibin Dong; Lu Sun; Siqi Qin; Renqing Wang; Peiming Zheng; Hui Wang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.