Literature DB >> 30692242

Home Use of Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Very Young Children: A Multicenter, 3-Week, Randomized Trial.

Martin Tauschmann1,2,3, Janet M Allen1,2, Katrin Nagl3, Maria Fritsch3, James Yong4, Emily Metcalfe4, Dominique Schaeffer5, Muriel Fichelle5, Ulrike Schierloh5, Alena G Thiele6, Daniela Abt7, Harald Kojzar8, Julia K Mader8, Sonja Slegtenhorst9, Nicole Barber1, Malgorzata E Wilinska1,2, Charlotte Boughton1, Gianluca Musolino1, Judy Sibayan10, Nathan Cohen10, Craig Kollman10, Sabine E Hofer7, Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer11, Thomas M Kapellen6, Carlo L Acerini2, Carine de Beaufort5, Fiona Campbell4, Birgit Rami-Merhar3, Roman Hovorka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in children with type 1 diabetes aged 1-7 years as well as evaluate the role of diluted insulin on glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In an open-label, multicenter, multinational, randomized crossover study, 24 children with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy (median age 5 years [interquartile range 3-6] and mean ± SD HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.7% [57 ± 8 mmol/mol] and total insulin 13.2 ± 4.8 units/day) underwent two 21-day periods of unrestricted living and we compared hybrid closed-loop with diluted insulin (U20) and hybrid closed-loop with standard strength insulin (U100) in random order. During both interventions, the Cambridge model predictive control algorithm was used.
RESULTS: The proportion of time that sensor glucose was in the target range between 3.9 and 10 mmol/L (primary end point) was not different between interventions (mean ± SD 72 ± 8% vs. 70 ± 7% for closed-loop with diluted insulin vs. closed-loop with standard insulin, respectively; P = 0.16). There was no difference in mean glucose levels (8.0 ± 0.8 vs. 8.2 ± 0.6 mmol/L; P = 0.14), glucose variability (SD of sensor glucose 3.1 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.4 mmol/L; P = 0.16), or the proportion of time spent with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L (4.5 ± 1.7% vs. 4.7 ± 1.4%; P = 0.47) or <2.8 mmol/L (0.6 ± 0.5% vs. 0.6 ± 0.4%; P > 0.99). Total daily insulin delivery did not differ (17.3 ± 5.6 vs. 18.9 ± 6.9 units/day; P = 0.07). No closed-loop-related severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Unrestricted home use of day-and-night closed-loop in very young children with type 1 diabetes is feasible and safe. The use of diluted insulin during closed-loop does not provide additional benefits compared with standard strength insulin.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30692242     DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  25 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Pancreas: Current Progress and Future Outlook in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Rozana Ramli; Monika Reddy; Nick Oliver
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Recent advances in closed-loop insulin delivery.

Authors:  Julia Ware; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 3.  Automated insulin dosing systems: Advances after a century of insulin.

Authors:  Hood Thabit; Rayhan Lal; Lalantha Leelarathna
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 4.  Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sophie Templer
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  Type 1 diabetes mellitus management in young children: implementation of current technologies.

Authors:  Michal Nevo-Shenker; Moshe Phillip; Revital Nimri; Shlomit Shalitin
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Young Children Have Higher Variability of Insulin Requirements: Observations During Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery.

Authors:  Klemen Dovc; Charlotte Boughton; Martin Tauschmann; Hood Thabit; Lia Bally; Janet M Allen; Carlo L Acerini; Sabine Arnolds; Carine de Beaufort; Richard M Bergenstal; Fiona Campbell; Amy Criego; David B Dunger; Daniella Elleri; Mark L Evans; Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer; Sabine Hofer; Thomas Kapellen; Lalantha Leelarathna; Thomas R Pieber; Birgit Rami-Merhar; Viral N Shah; Judy Sibayan; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Closed-loop control in insulin pumps for type-1 diabetes mellitus: safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Julia Fuchs; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Diabetes Technology and Therapy in the Pediatric Age Group.

Authors:  David M Maahs; Laya Ekhlaspour; Shlomit Shalitin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 7.337

9.  The Impact of a Recently Approved Automated Insulin Delivery System on Glycemic, Sleep, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Alessandro Bisio; Linda Gonder-Frederick; Ryan McFadden; Daniel Cherñavvsky; Mary Voelmle; Michael Pajewski; Pearl Yu; Heather Bonner; Sue A Brown
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-15

10.  Review of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems for Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: Tailored Solutions for Subpopulations.

Authors:  Eleonora M Aiello; Sunil Deshpande; Basak Ozaslan; Kelilah L Wolkowicz; Eyal Dassau; Jordan E Pinsker; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.