Literature DB >> 30692238

Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Risk Profile From Childhood to Midlife Between Individuals Who Did and Did Not Develop Diabetes at Follow-up: The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Tingting Du1,2, Camilo Fernandez2, Rupert Barshop2, Yajun Guo2, Marie Krousel-Wood2, Wei Chen2, Lu Qi2, Emily Harville2, Franck Mauvais-Jarvis3,4, Vivian Fonseca3,4, Lydia Bazzano5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Childhood and young adulthood may represent time periods in which cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and their cumulative exposure lay the foundation for future risk of chronic diseases. We examined the longitudinal burden of CVRFs since childhood in men and women in whom diabetes did and did not develop at follow-up. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 1,530 participants (mean [SD] follow-up time 33.1 [8.2] years), who participated in the Bogalusa Heart Study and had been examined at least four times starting in childhood (mean age [SD] at first examination 9.4 [3.1] years). The area under the growth curve was used as a measure of cumulative exposure to CVRFs since childhood.
RESULTS: In childhood, boys and girls in whom diabetes did and did not develop at follow-up had similar CVRFs. Yet, over time, women during the transition from normoglycemia to diabetes experienced greater adverse changes in total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (noted as early as 23.5 years old and persisting across adulthood up to the age of the diagnosis of diabetes); a higher burden of exposure to BMI, TC, LDL cholesterol, and FPG from childhood to midlife; and a greater change in rates of BMI, TC, LDL cholesterol, and FPG since childhood than men during the same transition (interaction P values <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The greater exposure of women to and burden of CVRFs associated with diagnosis of diabetes may help to explain the stronger impact of diabetes as a major risk factor for cardiovascular events in women compared with men.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30692238      PMCID: PMC6429632          DOI: 10.2337/dc18-2029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  31 in total

1.  Childhood adiposity as a predictor of cardiac mass in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  Xiangrong Li; Shengxu Li; Eralp Ulusoy; Wei Chen; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Gerald S Berenson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Rachel Huxley; Federica Barzi; Mark Woodward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-21

3.  Diabetes as risk factor for incident coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 coronary events.

Authors:  Sanne A E Peters; Rachel R Huxley; Mark Woodward
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Sex-specific differential in risk of diabetes-related macrovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda Lyon; Elizabeth A Jackson; Rita R Kalyani; Dhananjay Vaidya; Catherine Kim
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Trajectories of Childhood Blood Pressure and Adult Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Shengxu Li; Lydia Bazzano; Jiang He; Paul Whelton; Wei Chen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Variability of body weight and health outcomes in the Framingham population.

Authors:  L Lissner; P M Odell; R B D'Agostino; J Stokes; B E Kreger; A J Belanger; K D Brownell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D Levy; R J Garrison; D D Savage; W B Kannel; W P Castelli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Why is diabetes mellitus a stronger risk factor for fatal ischemic heart disease in women than in men? The Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  E L Barrett-Connor; B A Cohn; D L Wingard; S L Edelstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Variability and rapid increase in body mass index during childhood are associated with adult obesity.

Authors:  Shengxu Li; Wei Chen; Dianjianyi Sun; Camilo Fernandez; Jian Li; Tanika Kelly; Jiang He; Marie Krousel-Wood; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in the burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk across the life course.

Authors:  Amy G Huebschmann; Rachel R Huxley; Wendy M Kohrt; Philip Zeitler; Judith G Regensteiner; Jane E B Reusch
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Obesity and cardiovascular disease in women.

Authors:  Camila Manrique-Acevedo; Bhavana Chinnakotla; Jaume Padilla; Luis A Martinez-Lemus; David Gozal
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 3.  Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine.

Authors:  Franck Mauvais-Jarvis; Noel Bairey Merz; Peter J Barnes; Roberta D Brinton; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Dawn L DeMeo; Geert J De Vries; C Neill Epperson; Ramaswamy Govindan; Sabra L Klein; Amedeo Lonardo; Pauline M Maki; Louise D McCullough; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Judith G Regensteiner; Joshua B Rubin; Kathryn Sandberg; Ayako Suzuki
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes in women and men hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 in New Orleans.

Authors:  Yilin Yoshida; Scott A Gillet; Margo I Brown; Yuanhao Zu; Sarah M Wilson; Sabreen J Ahmed; Saritha Tirumalasetty; Dragana Lovre; Marie Krousel-Wood; Joshua L Denson; Franck Mauvais-Jarvis
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.027

5.  Gender difference in the association between TyG index and subclinical atherosclerosis: results from the I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Lu; Chun-Chin Chang; Ruey-Hsing Chou; Yi-Lin Tsai; Li-Kuo Liu; Liang-Kung Chen; Po-Hsun Huang; Shing-Jong Lin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 9.951

6.  Adverse differences in cardiometabolic risk factor levels between individuals with pre-diabetes and normal glucose metabolism are more pronounced in women than in men: the Maastricht Study.

Authors:  Rianneke de Ritter; Simone J S Sep; Carla J H van der Kallen; Miranda T Schram; Annemarie Koster; Abraham A Kroon; Marleen M J van Greevenbroek; Simone J P M Eussen; Pieter C Dagnelie; Marit de Jong; Rimke C Vos; Mark Woodward; Michiel L Bots; Sanne A E Peters; Coen D A Stehouwer
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-11-15

7.  Sex differences in soluble prorenin receptor in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bruna Visniauskas; Danielle Y Arita; Carla B Rosales; Mohammed A Feroz; Christina Luffman; Michael J Accavitti; Gabrielle Dawkins; Jennifer Hong; Andrew C Curnow; Tina K Thethi; John J Lefante; Edgar A Jaimes; Franck Mauvais-Jarvis; Vivian A Fonseca; Minolfa C Prieto
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.027

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.