Literature DB >> 30692100

Cell-Proliferation Imaging for Monitoring Response to CDK4/6 Inhibition Combined with Endocrine-Therapy in Breast Cancer: Comparison of [18F]FLT and [18F]ISO-1 PET/CT.

Azadeh Elmi1, Mehran Makvandi1, Chi-Chang Weng1, Catherine Hou1, Amy S Clark2, Robert H Mach1, David A Mankoff3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in combination with endocrine-therapy have emerged as an important regimen of care for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer, although identifying predictive biomarkers remains a challenge. We assessed the ability of two PET-proliferation tracers, [18F]FLT and [18F]ISO-1, for evaluating response to CDK4/6-inhibitor (palbociclib) and ER-antagonist (fulvestrant). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: To determine the effect of CDK4/6 inhibition combined with estrogen-blockade, we assessed cell proliferation in six breast cancer cell lines after 1, 3, and 6 days of treatment with palbociclib and/or fulvestrant. These data were correlated to in vitro radiotracer assays and results were verified by longitudinal [18F]FLT and [18F]ISO-1 micro-PET imaging performed in MCF7 tumor-bearing mice.
RESULTS: All palbociclib-sensitive cell lines showed decreased [18F]FLT accumulation and S-phase depletion after treatment, with both measures augmented by combination therapy. In contrast, these cells showed changes in [18F]ISO-1 analogue-binding and G0 arrest only after prolonged treatment. MicroPET imaging of MCF7 xenografts showed a significant decrease in [18F]FLT but no changes in [18F]ISO-1 uptake in all treated mice on day 3. On day 14, however, mice treated with combination therapy showed a significant decrease in [18F]ISO-1, corresponding to G0 arrest, while maintaining reduced [18F]FLT uptake, which corresponded to S-phase depletion.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest complementary roles of [18F]FLT and [18F]ISO-1 PET in evaluating tumor-proliferation after combined CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy in breast cancer. [18F]FLT is more sensitive to immediate changes in S-phase, whereas [18F]ISO-1 can assess more delayed changes related to cell-cycle arrest and transition to G0 quiescence from combination therapy. These data suggest a potential role for early prediction of long-term response using these imaging biomarkers. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30692100     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating the Accuracy of FUCCI Cell Cycle In Vivo Fluorescent Imaging to Assess Tumor Proliferation in Preclinical Oncology Models.

Authors:  Yun Lu; Adriana V F Massicano; Carlos A Gallegos; Katherine A Heinzman; Sean W Parish; Jason M Warram; Anna G Sorace
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  The cell-line-derived subcutaneous tumor model in preclinical cancer research.

Authors:  Stephen M Stribbling; Anderson J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 3.  Novel applications of molecular imaging to guide breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christine E Edmonds; Sophia R O'Brien; David A Mankoff; Austin R Pantel
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.605

4.  Response monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: a comparison of survival times between FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT.

Authors:  Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad; Marianne Vogsen; Rasmus Mølgård Vester; Maiken Madsen Bjerregaard Olsen; Hjalte Oltmann; Poul-Erik Braad; Jon Thor Asmussen; Oke Gerke; Werner Vach; Kristian Kidholm; Annette Raskov Kodahl; Wolfgang Weber; Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  Breast Cancer 18F-ISO-1 Uptake as a Marker of Proliferation Status.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Robert K Doot; Anthony J Young; Erin K Schubert; Julia Tchou; Daniel A Pryma; Michael D Farwell; Anupma Nayak; Amy Ziober; Michael D Feldman; Angela DeMichele; Amy S Clark; Payal D Shah; Hsiaoju Lee; Sean D Carlin; Robert H Mach; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Translational strategy using multiple nuclear imaging biomarkers to evaluate target engagement and early therapeutic efficacy of SAR439859, a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader.

Authors:  Laurent Besret; Sébastien d'Heilly; Cathy Aubert; Guillaume Bluet; Florence Gruss-Leleu; Françoise Le-Gall; Anne Caron; Laurent Andrieu; Sylvie Vincent; Maysoun Shomali; Monsif Bouaboula; Carole Voland; Jeffrey Ming; Sébastien Roy; Srinivas Rao; Chantal Carrez; Erwan Jouannot
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  Approaches to PET Imaging of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Lindsey R Drake; Ansel T Hillmer; Zhengxin Cai
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Imaging of Preclinical Endometrial Cancer Models for Monitoring Tumor Progression and Response to Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Heidi Espedal; Tina Fonnes; Kristine E Fasmer; Camilla Krakstad; Ingfrid S Haldorsen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  The G1 phase optical reporter serves as a sensor of CDK4/6 inhibition in vivo.

Authors:  Cuiping Guo; Yuxian Guo; Jingjing Liu; Yiyang Gao; Min Wei; Ruijun Zhao; Min Chen; Guojun Zhang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET or 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET to assess early response to aromatase inhibitors (AI) in women with ER+ operable breast cancer in a window-of-opportunity study.

Authors:  Perrin E Romine; Lanell M Peterson; Brenda F Kurland; Darrin W Byrd; Alena Novakova-Jiresova; Mark Muzi; Jennifer M Specht; Robert K Doot; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn; Paul E Kinahan; David A Mankoff; Hannah M Linden
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.