Literature DB >> 30691905

CDDPath: A method for quantifying the loss and recovery of construction and demolition debris in the United States.

Timothy G Townsend1, Wesley W Ingwersen2, Briana Niblick3, Pradeep Jain4, Jim Wally4.   

Abstract

National generation estimates for seven material types in the construction and demolition debris stream are regularly published in the United States. However, the quantities of these materials in different end-of-life management pathways are not published or otherwise made available. Quantification of end-of-life management pathways is useful for identifying approaches to decrease disposal and increase material recovery. An issue for construction and demolition debris is that data needed for a nationwide estimate of management pathways are not tracked in a single system. We propose and outline a method that draws on a combination of data sources, including nationwide generation estimates, state data, industry association data, and recovery facility reports. Capturing the available data and using the proposed method, we can estimate what end-of-life pathways are used for the seven materials in the US Environmental Protection Agency's annual reports of CDD generation (steel, wood products, drywall and plaster, brick and clay tile, asphalt shingles, concrete and asphalt concrete), and five additional materials managed within the CDD waste stream (carpet, plastic, glass, cardboard and organics). Method results indicate that the vast majority of CDD concrete and asphalt pavement, which in 2014 constituted ∼78% of the overall mass of the stream's components, were reclaimed for use, primarily in road projects. A significant opportunity for material recovery still exists for the remaining ∼22% of the stream. In 2014, approximately 64% of these remaining materials in the US was ultimately routed for landfill disposal. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Building material disposal; End-of-life management; Material flows; Material recovery; Mixed C&D MRF

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30691905      PMCID: PMC6464109          DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  3 in total

1.  Estimating construction and demolition debris generation using a materials flow analysis approach.

Authors:  K M Cochran; T G Townsend
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 7.145

2.  Quantities of arsenic-treated wood in demolition debris generated by Hurricane Katrina.

Authors:  Brajesh Dubey; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Timothy G Townsendt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Searching quality data for municipal solid waste planning.

Authors:  Moe Chowdhury
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 7.145

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Analyzing Economy-Scale Solid Waste Generation Using the United States Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Model.

Authors:  David E Meyer; Mo Li; Wesley W Ingwersen
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.204

Review 2.  End-of-Life Materials Used as Supplementary Cementitious Materials in the Concrete Industry.

Authors:  Adrian Ionut Nicoara; Alexandra Elena Stoica; Mirijam Vrabec; Nastja Šmuc Rogan; Saso Sturm; Cleva Ow-Yang; Mehmet Ali Gulgun; Zeynep Basaran Bundur; Ion Ciuca; Bogdan Stefan Vasile
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.