Literature DB >> 30691817

A Review of Decision Aids for Patients Considering More Than One Type of Invasive Treatment.

Kathleen A Leinweber1, Jesse A Columbo2, Ravinder Kang3, Spencer W Trooboff4, Philip P Goodney5.   

Abstract

With continuous advances in medicine, patients are faced with several medical or surgical treatment options for their health conditions. Decision aids may be useful in helping patients navigate these options and choose based on their goals and values. We reviewed the literature to identify decision aids and better understand the effect on patient decision-making. We identified 107 decision aids designed to help patients make decisions between medical treatment or screening options; 39 decision aids were used to help patients choose between a medical and surgical treatment, and five were identified that aided patients in deciding between a major open surgical procedure and a less invasive option. Many of the decision aids were used to help patients decide between prostate, colorectal, and breast cancer screening or treatment options. Although most decision aids were not associated with a significant effect on the actual decision made, they were largely associated with increased patient knowledge, decreased decisional conflict, more accurate perception of risks, increased satisfaction with their decision, and no increase in anxiety surrounding their decision. These data identify a gap in use of decision aids in surgical decision-making and highlight the potential to help surgical patients make value-based, knowledgeable decisions regarding their treatment.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision aid; Decision tool; Shared decision-making; Surgical decision; Surgical decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30691817     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

1.  Development of a web-based, patient-centered decision aid for oropharyngeal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Elaine O Bigelow; Melina J Windon; Carole Fakhry; Ana P Kiess; Tanguy Seiwert; Gypsyamber D'Souza
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.337

2.  Surgeon Use of Shared Decision-making for Older Adults Considering Major Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nathan D Baggett; Kathryn Schulz; Anne Buffington; Nicholas Marka; Bret M Hanlon; Christopher Zimmermann; Jennifer Tucholka; Dan Fox; Justin T Clapp; Robert M Arnold; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 16.681

Review 3.  Supporting Patient Autonomy and Informed Decision-Making in Prenatal Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Katie Stoll; Judith Jackson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

4.  The patient experience of hemodialysis vascular access decision-making.

Authors:  Karen Woo; Huibrie Pieters
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.