Literature DB >> 30691632

Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrea Busnelli1, Chiara Dallagiovanna2, Marco Reschini3, Alessio Paffoni4, Luigi Fedele2, Edgardo Somigliana2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish the risk factors for monozygotic twin (MZT) and monochorionic twin (MCT) pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF).
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women who achieved MZT and non-MZT pregnancies through IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Systematic search of Medline from January 1995 to October 2018 with cross-checking of references from relevant articles in English. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Possible risk factors for MZT or MCT pregnancies after IVF, comprising extended embryo culture, insemination method (conventional IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI]), embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies or for monogenic/single-gene defects (PGT-A or PGT-M) programs, assisted hatching (AH), oocytes donation, female age, and embryo cryopreservation. RESULT(S): A total of 40 studies were included. Blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer, and female age <35 years were associated with a statistically significant increase in the MZT and MCT pregnancy rate after IVF: (23 studies, OR 2.16, 95% CI, 1.74-2.68, I2=78%; 4 studies, OR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62, I2=62%; and 3 studies, OR 1.90, 95% CI, 1.21-2.98, I2=59%; 2 studies, OR 2.34; 95% CI, 1.69-3.23, I2=0, respectively). Conventional IVF compared with ICSI and assisted hatching were associated with a statistically significantly increased risk of MZT pregnancy (9 studies, OR 1.19, 95% CI, 1.04-1.35, I2=0; 16 studies, OR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.09-1.27, I2=29%, respectively). Embryo biopsy for PGT-A or PGT-M, embryo cryopreservation, and oocytes donation were not associated with MZT pregnancies after IVF. CONCLUSION(S): Blastocyst transfer is associated with an increased risk of both MZT and MCT pregnancies after IVF. Further evidence is needed to clarify the impact of female age, insemination method and AH on the investigated outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst; IVF; monochorionic; monozygotic

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30691632     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  17 in total

1.  High grade trophectoderm is associated with monozygotic twinning in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Shiru Xu; Qizhen Zheng; Meilan Mo; Feng Xiong; Xiuyu Hu; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  On the origin of zygosity and chorionicity in twinning: evidence from human in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Enver Kerem Dirican; Safak Olgan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Monozygotic twin rate among ART centers: a multicenter analysis of data from 18 Italian units.

Authors:  Giulia Scaravelli; Valerio Pisaturo; Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Claudia Livi; Andrea Borini; Ermanno Greco; Maria Teresa Villani; Maria Elisabetta Coccia; Alberto Revelli; Giuseppe Ricci; Francesco Fusi; Mauro Costa; Emanuela Migliorati; Roberto De Luca; Vincenzo Vigiliano; Simone Bolli; Marco Reschini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 4.  Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar; Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo; Agustín Ciapponi; Simone Cornelisse; Deborah Blake
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-19

5.  Clinical and perinatal outcomes of fresh single-blastocyst-transfer cycles under an early follicular phase prolonged protocol according to day of trigger estradiol levels.

Authors:  Yingfen Ying; Xiaosheng Lu; Huina Zhang; Samuel Kofi Arhin; Xiaohong Hou; Zefan Wang; Han Wu; Jieqiang Lu; Yunbing Tang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Maria Giulia Minasi; Elisabetta Cursio; Pier Francesco Greco; Paolo Barillari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Factors associated with embryo splitting and clinical outcome of monozygotic twins in pregnancies after IVF and ICSI.

Authors:  A MacKenna; J E Schwarze; J Crosby; F Zegers-Hochschild
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-05-15

8.  Levels of caspase-3 and histidine-rich glycoprotein in the embryo secretome as biomarkers of good-quality day-2 embryos and high-quality blastocysts.

Authors:  Helena Kaihola; Fatma Gülen Yaldir; Therese Bohlin; Raghad Samir; Julius Hreinsson; Helena Åkerud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: multifoetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management.

Authors:  Pei Cai; Yan Ouyang; Fei Gong; Xihong Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Pregnancy Outcomes of Single/Double Blastocysts and Cleavage Embryo Transfers: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 24,422 Frozen-Thawed Cycles.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Long; Yuanyuan Wang; Fangrong Wu; Rong Li; Lixue Chen; Weiping Qian; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.