Literature DB >> 30691468

Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.

M T Driessen1, J Whalen2, B Seewoodharry Buguth2, L A Vallejo-Aparicio3, I P Naya4, Y Asukai5, B Alcázar-Navarrete6, M Miravitlles7, F García-Río8, N A Risebrough9.   

Abstract

Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified of the below corrections to the 5th paragraph in the Discussion section.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30691468      PMCID: PMC6348614          DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-0985-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Res        ISSN: 1465-9921


Correction to: Respir Res https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0916-7 Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified of the below corrections to the 5th paragraph in the Discussion section. Reference 24 needs to be amended to 25 The 12-week study needs to be corrected to 8-week study Corrected text: This study is the first to compare two LAMA/LABA dual therapies using direct head-to-head data from a randomized, 8-week study [25], which is the most reliable set of data to include within a cost-effectiveness model [25].
  1 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.

Authors:  M T Driessen; J Whalen; B Seewoodharry Buguth; L A Vallejo-Aparicio; I P Naya; Y Asukai; B Alcázar-Navarrete; M Miravitlles; F García-Río; N A Risebrough
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2018-11-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.