Literature DB >> 30691370

Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Breast Cancer Screening: Rationale, Concept, and Transfer to Clinical Practice.

Christiane K Kuhl1.   

Abstract

Given the increasing understanding of cancer as a heterogeneous group of diseases, detection methods should offer a sensitivity profile that ensures perfect sensitivity for biologically important cancers while screening out self-limiting pseudocancers. However, mammographic screening is biased toward detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and slowly growing cancers-and thus frequently fails to detect biologically aggressive cancers. This explains the persistently high rates of interval cancers and high rates of breast cancer mortality observed in spite of decades of mammographic screening. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in contrast, has a sensitivity profile that matches clinical needs. Conventional MRI is not suitable for population-wide screening due to high cost, limited tolerability, and lack of availability. We introduced abbreviated MRI in 2014. Abbreviated MRI will change the way MRI is used in clinical medicine. This article describes the rationale to use MRI in general, and abbreviated MRI in particular, for breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abbreviated MRI; breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30691370     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-121417-100403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Med        ISSN: 0066-4219            Impact factor:   13.739


  26 in total

Review 1.  Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Breast cancer screening: in the era of personalized medicine, age is just a number.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi; Simone Schiaffino; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  Breast cancer screening programs: does one risk fit all?

Authors:  Federica Pediconi; Francesca Galati
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-04

4.  Genetic Testing May Help Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities for African American Women.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Comparison of diagnostic values of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Maryam Farghadani; Jalil Khataei; Mahnaz Fosouli; Maryam Riahinezhad
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 6.  The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Whole-genome circulating tumor DNA methylation landscape reveals sensitive biomarkers of breast cancer.

Authors:  Luo Hai; Lingyu Li; Zongzhi Liu; Zhongsheng Tong; Yingli Sun
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-06-17

8.  MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience of a single tertiary referral cancer centre and prospects for the future.

Authors:  Silvia Penco; Anna Rotili; Filippo Pesapane; Chiara Trentin; Valeria Dominelli; Angela Faggian; Mariagiorgia Farina; Irene Marinucci; Anna Bozzini; Maria Pizzamiglio; Anna Maria Ierardi; Enrico Cassano
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Intraductal administration of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea as a novel rodent mammary tumor model.

Authors:  Dongcheng Gao; Jianhua Liu; Jingping Yuan; Juan Wu; Xinwen Kuang; Deguang Kong; Weijie Zheng; Guannan Wang; Saraswati Sukumar; Yi Tu; Chuang Chen; Shengrong Sun
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

10.  Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.

Authors:  Christopher E Comstock; Constantine Gatsonis; Gillian M Newstead; Bradley S Snyder; Ilana F Gareen; Jennifer T Bergin; Habib Rahbar; Janice S Sung; Christina Jacobs; Jennifer A Harvey; Mary H Nicholson; Robert C Ward; Jacqueline Holt; Andrew Prather; Kathy D Miller; Mitchell D Schnall; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 157.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.