| Literature DB >> 30691067 |
Manuel Peñas-Garzón1, Almudena Gómez-Avilés2, Jorge Bedia3, Juan J Rodriguez4, Carolina Belver5.
Abstract
Several activatedEntities:
Keywords: Lignin; TiO2/activated carbon; acetaminophen; activating agent; heterostructures; solar photocatalysis; water purification
Year: 2019 PMID: 30691067 PMCID: PMC6384744 DOI: 10.3390/ma12030378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Activation conditions of the different carbons.
| Sample | Activating Agent | Act. Agent: Lignin Mass Ratio | Activation Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-C | FeCl3 | 3:1 | 800 |
| Zn-C | ZnCl2 | 3:1 | 500 |
| P-C | H3PO4 | 3:1 | 500 |
| K-C | KOH | 4:1 | 900 |
Figure 1XRD patterns of the TiO2/activated carbon heterostructures and bare TiO2. Characteristic peaks of anatase phase (JCPDS-78–2486) are indicated (*).
TiO2 content, average crystal size (D), band gap (Eg) and pHpzc of the heterostructures.
| Sample | %TiO2a | D (nm)b | Eg (eV) | pHpzcc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2/Fe-C | 75.9 | 10.1 | 3.28 | 6.36 |
| TiO2/Zn-C | 68.5 | 8.6 | 3.42 | 5.96 |
| TiO2/P-C | 81.3 | 10.6 | 3.50 | 4.86 |
| TiO2/K-C | 83.9 | 9.4 | 3.45 | 6.17 |
| TiO2 | n.m | 10.5 | 3.33 | 6.58 |
a Determined by WDXRF (n.m. not measured). b Average crystal size from (101) diffraction peak. c Determined from the drift method.
Figure 2SEM images and particle size distribution of: (a) TiO2; (b) TiO2/Fe-C; (c) TiO2/Zn-C; (d) TiO2/P-C; (e) TiO2/K-C.
Figure 3N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (−196 °C) of (a) activated carbons and (b) TiO2 and TiO2/x-C heterostructures.
Surface area values of the synthesized materials.
| Sample | SBET | SMP | SEXT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbonized lignin | 62 | 62 | - |
| Fe-C | 756 | 695 | 61 |
| Zn-C | 1129 | 451 | 678 |
| P-C | 807 | 303 | 504 |
| K-C | 1446 | 1142 | 304 |
| TiO2/Fe-C | 300 | 125 | 175 |
| TiO2/Zn-C | 491 | 108 | 383 |
| TiO2/P-C | 435 | 109 | 326 |
| TiO2/K-C | 465 | 156 | 309 |
| TiO2 | 178 | - | 178 |
Figure 4FTIR spectra of: (a) activated carbons; (b) TiO2 and TiO2/x-C heterostructures.
Figure 5(a) UV–vis diffuse absorbance spectra and (b) the (αhυ)1/2 versus (hυ) plot of the synthesized photocatalysts.
Figure 6Acetaminophen (ACE) concentration versus time under solar irradiation with TiO2 and TiO2/x-C heterostructures ([Photocatalyst]0: 250 mg·L−1 of TiO2; [ACE]0 after adsorption equilibrium: 5 mg·L−1; intensity of irradiation: 600 W·m−2).
TOC removal after 6 h of solar irradiation with the photocatalysts tested.
| Photocatalyst | Removed TOC (%) |
|---|---|
| TiO2/Fe-C | 43.3 |
| TiO2/Zn-C | 23.9 |
| TiO2/P-C | 35.5 |
| TiO2/K-C | 30.2 |
| TiO2 | 59.4 |
Figure 7Absorbance evolution profiles (600 nm) during settling test of TiO2/Fe-C and TiO2 photocatalysts.
Figure 8ACE removal with TiO2/Fe-C during consecutive cycles (Reaction conditions identical than those from Figure 6).
Figure 9N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (−196 °C) of TiO2/Fe-C before reaction and after four consecutive cycles. Surface area values of the photocatalyst are also included in the embedded table.