Literature DB >> 30690805

Genotyping strategies of selection candidates in livestock breeding programmes.

Tom Granleese1,2, Samuel A Clark1,2, Julius H J van der Werf1,2.   

Abstract

Benefits of genomic selection (GS) in livestock breeding operations are well known particularly where traits are sex-limited, hard to measure, have a low heritability and/or measured later in life. Sheep and beef breeders have a higher cost:benefit ratio for GS compared to dairy. Therefore, strategies for genotyping selection candidates should be explored to maximize the economic benefit of GS. The aim of the paper was to investigate, via simulation, the additional genetic gain achieved by selecting proportions of male selection candidates to be genotyped via truncation selection. A two-trait selection index was used that contained an easy and early-in-life measurement (such as post-weaning weight) as well as a hard-to-measure trait (such as intra-muscular fat). We also evaluated the optimal proportion of female selection candidates to be genotyped in breeding programmes using natural mating and/or artificial insemination (NatAI), multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) or juvenile in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (JIVET). The final aim of the project was to investigate the total dollars spent to increase the genetic merit by one genetic standard deviation (SD) using GS and/or reproductive technologies. For NatAI and MOET breeding programmes, females were selected to have progeny by 2 years of age, while 1-month-old females were required for JIVET. Genomic testing the top 20% of male selection candidates achieved 80% of the maximum benefit from GS when selection of male candidates prior to genomic testing had an accuracy of 0.36, while 54% needed to be tested to get the same benefit when the prior selection accuracy was 0.11. To achieve 80% of the maximum benefit in female, selection required 66%, 47% and 56% of female selection candidates to be genotyped in NatAI, MOET and JIVET breeding programmes, respectively. While JIVET and MOET breeding programmes achieved the highest annual genetic gain, genotyping male selection candidates provides the most economical way to increase rates of genetic gain facilitated by genomic testing.
© 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JIVET; MOET; genomic selection; natural mating

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30690805     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing the Construction and Update Strategies for the Genomic Selection of Pig Reference and Candidate Populations in China.

Authors:  Xia Wei; Tian Zhang; Ligang Wang; Longchao Zhang; Xinhua Hou; Hua Yan; Lixian Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Evaluation of sequencing strategies for whole-genome imputation with hybrid peeling.

Authors:  Roger Ros-Freixedes; Andrew Whalen; Gregor Gorjanc; Alan J Mileham; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Effect of genotyping strategies on the sustained benefit of single-step genomic BLUP over multiple generations.

Authors:  Milagros Sánchez-Mayor; Valentina Riggio; Pau Navarro; Beatriz Gutiérrez-Gil; Chris S Haley; Luis Fernando De la Fuente; Juan-José Arranz; Ricardo Pong-Wong
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.

Authors:  Richard Bernstein; Manuel Du; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.297

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.