| Literature DB >> 30690722 |
Chi-Hua Chen1,2, Chun-Bing Chen3,4,5,6,7,8, Chee Jen Chang5,9,10, Yu Jr Lin5,9,10, Chuang-Wei Wang3,4, Ching-Chi Chi3,5, Chun-Wei Lu3,4,5,6, Wei-Ti Chen3,5, Ren-You Pan3,4, Shih-Chi Su3,8, Lung-An Hsu11, Ya-Ching Chang3,5, Kuang-Hui Yu12, Yeong-Jian Jan Wu13, Ko-Ming Lin14, Shuen-Iu Hung15, Shih-Ming Chen2, Wen-Hung Chung3,4,5,6,7,8.
Abstract
The safety of newer xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat compared to allopurinol remains unclear. To compare the risks of allopurinol hypersensitivity and febuxostat hypersensitivity and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in Asians, we conducted a population-based cohort study enrolling patients receiving allopurinol or febuxostat from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Health System across Taiwan during 2012-2016 and further performed a meta-analysis incorporating two recent studies. Among the 61,539 users, a corresponding 12,007 and 5,680 patients were identified as new users. The overall incidence of febuxostat hypersensitivity was significantly lower than allopurinol hypersensitivity (0.2 vs. 2.7 per 1,000 new users; P < 0.001). There were 33 allopurinol-hypersensitivity reactions (including 18 severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions), and only one patient developed febuxostat-maculopapular exanthema. Moreover, febuxostat did not statistically increase the risk of CVD (hazard ratio (HR), 1.16; P = 0.152) and related death (HR, 1.49; P = 0.496) compared to allopurinol. The result of the meta-analysis also showed a consistent result. In conclusion, the incidence and severity of febuxostat-hypersensitivity are lower than with allopurinol. Febuxostat did not show an increased risk of CVD and related death.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30690722 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther ISSN: 0009-9236 Impact factor: 6.875