| Literature DB >> 30690626 |
M Rifqi Ismiraj1, Joop A J Arts1, Henk K Parmentier1.
Abstract
The presence and relative levels (titers) of IgM and IgG natural antibodies (NAb) binding keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), and natural (auto-) antibodies (N(A)Ab) binding salmon double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), (oxidated-) phosphatidyl (phosphoryl) choline-conjugated bovine serum albumin (PC-BSA), PC-conjugated ovalbumin (PC-OVA), and OVA, respectively, were studied in adult hen plasma, egg yolk, egg albumen, plasma of their hatchlings, and in 8-day-old chick plasma. Birds and eggs were from 2 lines divergently selected for high or low NAb levels binding KLH. This study aimed to determine 1) correlated phenotypic responses of selection for NAb to KLH, 2) transfer of maternal NAb and N(A)Ab via egg compartments, 3) levels of likely maternal NAb and N(A)Ab in hatchlings and 8-day-old chicks, and 4) whether a composite trait: IgM anti-PC-BSA/IgG anti-dsDNA ratio in the compartments could be used as a parameter for health or immune status. NAb and N(A)Ab to all tested antigens were found in adult hens, but low or no levels were found for IgM in yolk and IgG in albumen. Depending on the antigen, NAb and N(A)Ab were found in hatchlings and day 8 birds. Divergent selection and breeding based on NAb binding KLH affected antibody titers of almost all antigens in almost all compartments, in a similar way. Maternal transfer of NAb and N(A)Ab from the adult hen to offspring was via specific routes for specific antigens and isotypes, especially for IgG as suggested by cluster analyses and significant correlations. There was little indication of production of new NAb and N(A)Ab to the studied antigens in either the egg compartments or the hatchlings. A composite trait of IgM PC-BSA/IgG dsDNA ratio was as yet not indicative for immune status, as no significant differences were found between the lines for all compartments. In conclusion, hens provide neonatal chickens with natural (self-) binding IgG antibodies that have been proposed to perform homeostatic functions during the period in which neonates do not produce these antibodies themselves.Entities:
Keywords: divergent selection; maternal transfer; natural (auto-) antibodies; poultry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30690626 PMCID: PMC6527509 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
The effect of line on IgM and IgG titers of plasma samples collected from high (H) line and low (L) line hens at 35 wk of age (n = 15 hens per line).
| Antigen | Line | LSMeans | SE |
| Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC-BSA IgM | H | 9.15 | 0.22 | *** | H > L |
| L | 7.11 | ||||
| PC-BSA IgG | H | 7.95 | 0.39 | ** | H > L |
| L | 6.27 | ||||
| KLH IgM | H | 8.47 | 0.25 | *** | H > L |
| L | 6.26 | ||||
| KLH IgG | H | 7.59 | 0.48 | *** | H > L |
| L | 5.08 | ||||
| dsDNA IgM | H | 9.15 | 0.41 | *** | H > L |
| L | 6.86 | ||||
| dsDNA IgG | H | 8.78 | 0.51 | ** | H > L |
| L | 6.77 | ||||
| PC-OVA IgM | H | 7.31 | 0.25 | *** | H > L |
| L | 5.53 | ||||
| PC-OVA IgG | H | 6.87 | 0.45 | * | H > L |
| L | 5.35 | ||||
| OVA IgM | H | 8.80 | 0.28 | *** | H > L |
| L | 7.05 | ||||
| OVA IgG | H | 6.33 | 0.40 | ** | H > L |
| L | 4.43 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
The effect of line on IgM and IgG antibody titers in high (H) line and low (L) yolk (n = 15 per line).
| Antigen | Line | LSMeans | SE |
| Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC-BSA IgM | H | 5.01 | 0.69 | NS | H = L |
| L | 3.34 | ||||
| PC-BSA IgG | H | 5.25 | 0.48 | * | H > L |
| L | 3.81 | ||||
| KLH IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | 2.08 | 0.49 | |||
| KLH IgG | H | 4.32 | 0.23 | *** | H > L |
| L | 3.11 | ||||
| dsDNA IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | – | ||
| dsDNA IgG | H | 5.27 | 0.34 | NS | |
| L | 4.33 | ||||
| PC-OVA IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | – | ||
| PC-OVA IgG | H | 4.85 | 0.23 | NS | |
| L | 4.41 | ||||
| OVA IgM | H | 1.03 | 0.20 | NS | |
| L | 1.35 | ||||
| OVA IgG | H | 9.50 | 0.25 | NS | |
| L | 9.11 |
NF: Not Found.
NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001
The effect of line on IgM and IgG antibody titers in High (H) line and Low (L) line albumen (n = 15 per line).
| Antigen | Line | LSMeans | SE |
| Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC-BSA IgM | H | 2.20 | 0.31 | – | |
| L | NF | – | |||
| PC-BSA IgG | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | – | ||
| KLH IgM | H | 4.05 | 0.33 | *** | H > L |
| L | 1.50 | 0.36 | |||
| KLH IgG | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | – | ||
| dsDNA IgM | H | 1.20 | 0.17 | – | |
| L | NF | – | |||
| dsDNA IgG | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | |||
| PC-OVA IgM | H | 2.96 | 0.34 | ** | H > L |
| L | 0.91 | 0.36 | |||
| PC-OVA IgG | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | – | ||
| OVA IgM | H | 2.63 | 0.74 | NS | |
| L | 1.71 | 0.79 | |||
| OVA IgG | H | 2.46 | 1.63 | NS | |
| L | 2.32 | 1.26 |
NF: not found.
NS: not significant, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
The effect of line on IgM and IgG antibody titers in plasma at hatch from high (H) line and low (L) line chicks (n = 15 chicks per line).
| Antigen | Line | LSMeans | SE |
| Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC-BSA IgM | H | 3.05 | 0.22 | NS | |
| L | 2.63 | ||||
| PC-BSA IgG | H | 6.45 | 0.37 | NS | |
| L | 5.43 | ||||
| KLH IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | – | ||
| KLH IgG | H | 6.38 | 0.43 | ** | H > L |
| L | 4.65 | ||||
| dsDNA IgM | H | 2.79 | 0.21 | *** | H > L |
| L | 1.11 | ||||
| dsDNA IgG | H | 7.57 | 0.41 | ** | H > L |
| L | 5.65 | ||||
| PC-OVA IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | – | ||
| PC-OVA IgG | H | 5.67 | 0.41 | * | H > L |
| L | 4.47 | ||||
| OVA IgM | H | 1.05 | 0.25 | NS | |
| L | 1.18 | ||||
| OVA IgG | H | 5.28 | 0.28 | *** | H > L |
| L | 3.43 |
NF: not found.
NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
The effect of line on IgM and IgG antibody titers in plasma from high (H) line and low (L) line chicks at 8 days of age (n = 15 chicks per line).
| Antigen | Line | LSMeans | SE |
| Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC-BSA IgM | H | 1.47 | 0.19 | – | |
| L | NF | – | |||
| PC-BSA IgG | H | 2.12 | – | – | |
| L | NF | ||||
| KLH IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | ||||
| KLH IgG | H | 4.89 | 0.26 | *** | H > L |
| L | 2.50 | ||||
| dsDNA IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | ||||
| dsDNA IgG | H | 4.95 | 0.22 | *** | H > L |
| L | 3.35 | ||||
| PC-OVA IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF | – | |||
| PC-OVA IgG | H | 3.92 | 0.30 | 0.0017 | H > L |
| L | 2.43 | ||||
| OVA IgM | H | NF | – | – | |
| L | NF1 | – | |||
| OVA IgG | H | 2.99 | 0.22 | *** | H > L |
| L | 1.51 |
NF: not found
***P < 0.001
Correlation between IgM and IgG antibody titers in hen-yolk-hatchling samples.
| Description Pearson's | Hen-Yolk | Yolk-Hatchlings | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antigen | R | High Line | Low Line | High Line | Low Line |
| PC-BSA IgM | R | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.79 | −0.05 |
| P | NS | NS | ** | NS | |
| PC-BSA IgG | R | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.68 |
| P | *** | *** | * | ** | |
| KLH IgM | R | – | 0.04 | – | – |
| P | – | NS | – | – | |
| KLH IgG | R | 0.90 | 0.46 | 0.87 | 0.01 |
| P | *** | NS | *** | NS | |
| dsDNA IgM | R | – | – | – | – |
| P | – | – | – | – | |
| dsDNA IgG | R | 0.84 | 0.14 | 0.80 | 0.29 |
| P | *** | NS | ** | NS | |
| PC-OVA IgM | R | – | – | – | – |
| P | – | – | – | – | |
| PC-OVA IgG | R | −0.25 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.52 |
| P | NS | * | ** | * | |
| OVA IgM | R | −0.10 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| P | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| OVA IgG | R | 0.74 | 0.09 | 0.48 | 0.26 |
| P | ** | NS | NS | NS | |
–Not calculated.
NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Correlation between IgM and IgG antibody titers in hen-albumen-hatchling samples.
| Description Pearson's | Hen-Albumen | Albumen-Hatchlings | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antigen | R | High Line | Low Line | High Line | Low Line |
| PC-BSA IgM | R | 0.33 | – | −0.12 | – |
| P | NS | – | NS | – | |
| PC-BSA IgG | R | – | – | – | – |
| P | – | – | – | – | |
| KLH IgM | R | 0.38 | 0.57 | – | – |
| P | NS | * | – | – | |
| KLH IgG | R | – | – | – | – |
| P | – | – | – | – | |
| dsDNA IgM | R | 0.45 | – | 0.24 | – |
| P | NS | – | NS | – | |
| dsDNA IgG | R | – | – | – | – |
| P | – | – | – | – | |
| PC-OVA IgM | R | 0.32 | – | – | – |
| P | NS | – | – | – | |
| PC-OVA IgG | R | – | – | – | – |
| P | – | – | – | – | |
| OVA IgM | R | 0.74 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.42 |
| P | ** | NS | NS | NS | |
| OVA IgG | R | −0.09 | −0.11 | 0.25 | 0.03 |
| P | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
–Not calculated
NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Correlation between IgM and IgG antibody titers in hen and hatchling plasma samples.
| Description Pearson's | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Antigen | R | H Line | L Line |
| PC-BSA IgM | R | 0.23 | −0.01 |
| P | NS | NS | |
| PC-BSA IgG | R | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| P | *** | *** | |
| KLH IgM | R | – | – |
| P | – | – | |
| KLH IgG | R | 0.93 | 0.68 |
| P | *** | ** | |
| dsDNA IgM | R | 0.72 | 0.07 |
| P | ** | NS | |
| dsDNA IgG | R | 0.91 | 0.76 |
| P | *** | ** | |
| PC-OVA IgM | R | – | – |
| P | – | – | |
| PC-OVA IgG | R | 0.87 | 0.76 |
| P | *** | *** | |
| OVA IgM | R | 0.52 | −0.26 |
| P | * | NS | |
| OVA IgG | R | 0.80 | 0.55 |
| P | *** | * |
–Not calculated
NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Figure 1.Grouping by PCA of adult hens (A), hatchlings (B), yolk (C), albumen (D), and day 8 chicks (E) on the basis of IgM and IgG antibody titers to 5 antigens: KLH, PC-BSA, PC-OVA, dsDNA, and OVA. Diagrams include 15 birds or specimens from each line (enveloped) that were analyzed with ELISA. ‘Eigen values’ explaining the amount of variation were 60% horizontal and 20% vertical (A); 64% horizontal and 13% vertical (B); 58% horizontal and 17% vertical (C); 74% horizontal and 19% vertical (D); 73% horizontal and 12% vertical (E). Diagrams include antigen and isotype combinations (arrows). Length and direction of arrows indicate the contribution of the antigen–isotype combination to the grouping of the lines. Small fonts after the antigen label represent the isotype m: IgM and g: IgG.
Figure 2.Grouping of adult hens and their hatchlings on the basis of IgM and IgG antibody titers to 5 antigens: KLH, PC-BSA, PC-OVA, dsDNA, and OVA. Ordination plots by principal component analysis. Diagrams include 14 to 15 birds (hens and hatchlings) from each line (enveloped) that were analyzed with ELISA. ‘Eigen values’ explaining the amount of variation were 73% horizontal and 18% vertical. Diagram includes antigen and isotype combinations. Length and direction of arrows indicate the contribution of the antigen-isotype combination to the grouping of the lines. Small fonts after the antigen label represent the isotype m: IgM and g: IgG.
Comparison of IgM anti-PC-BSA/IgG anti-dsDNA ratios (composite trait) in high (H) line and low (L) line compartments.
| Compartment | Line | LSMean | SE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hen | H | 1.16 | 0.12 | 0.81 |
| L | 1.12 | |||
| Yolk | H | 1.06 | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| L | 0.70 | |||
| Hatchlings | H | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.28 |
| L | 0.50 | |||
| Day 8 | H | 0.29 | 0.04 | |
| L | – | – |
–Not calculated
Coating concentrations of antigens and conjugate dilutions used.
| Antigen Coating | Serum Starting | Dilution | Conjugate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antigen | Sample | Concentration (μg/mL) | Dilution | Steps | Conjugate | Dilution |
| PC-BSA | Hen Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Yolk | 2 | 10 | 2 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Albumen | 2 | 10 | 2 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Hatchling Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Day 8 Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 20,000 | |||
| KLH | Hen Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Yolk | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Albumen | 1 | 10 | 2 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Hatchling Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Day 8 Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| dsDNA | Hen Plasma | 0.5 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Yolk | 2 | 10 | 2 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 5,000 | |||
| Albumen | 2 | 10 | 2 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 5,000 | |||
| Hatchling Plasma | 0.5 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Day 8 Plasma | 1 | 20 | 2 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 20 | 2 | IgG | 5,000 | |||
| PC-OVA | Hen Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 20,000 |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 20,000 | |||
| Yolk | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 5,000 | |||
| Albumen | 1 | 10 | 2 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 5,000 | |||
| Hatchling Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 20,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 20,000 | |||
| Day 8 Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| OVA | Hen Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 20,000 |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 20,000 | |||
| Yolk | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Albumen | 1 | 10 | 2 | IgM | 10,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 10,000 | |||
| Hatchling Plasma | 1 | 40 | 4 | IgM | 20,000 | |
| 40 | 4 | IgG | 20,000 | |||
| Day 8 Plasma | 1 | 20 | 2 | IgM | 5,000 | |
| 10 | 2 | IgG | 10,000 |