Literature DB >> 30690556

Challenges with Implementing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Opioid Guideline: A Consensus Panel Report.

Kurt Kroenke1, Daniel P Alford2, Charles Argoff3, Bernard Canlas4, Edward Covington5, Joseph W Frank6, Karl J Haake7, Steven Hanling8, W Michael Hooten9, Stefan G Kertesz10, Richard L Kravitz11, Erin E Krebs12, Steven P Stanos13, Mark Sullivan14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A national crisis of opioid-related morbidity, mortality, and misuse has led to initiatives to address the appropriate role of opioids to treat pain. Deployment of a guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reduce the risks of opioid therapy has raised substantial clinical and public policy challenges. The agency anticipated implementation challenges and committed to reevaluating the guideline for intended and unintended effects on clinician and patient outcomes. OBSERVATIONS: A multidisciplinary expert panel met to review the influence of the core recommendations of the guideline on pain management practices, principally regarding the estimated 5 to 8 million Americans with chronic pain currently on opioids. The panel identified implementation challenges, including application of dosage ceilings and prescription duration guidance, failure to appreciate the importance of patient involvement in decisions to taper or discontinue opioids, barriers to diagnosis and treatment of opioid use disorder, and impeded access to recommended comprehensive, multimodal pain care. Furthermore, policy-making and regulatory bodies may misapply guideline recommendations without flexibility and, sometimes, without full awareness of what the guideline contains. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The panel largely supported the guideline, endorsing its focal points of safety and comprehensive assessment and monitoring. To mitigate clinical and policy challenges identified with implementing the guideline, the panel discussed areas where viewpoints diverged and arrived at consensus proposals. The target audience includes the leaders and institutions that create policy and influence guideline implementation to include regulatory agencies, legislators, public and private payers, and health care systems.
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensus Panel; Opioid Use Disorder; Opioids; Treatment Guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30690556     DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  52 in total

1.  The Association Between the Supply of Nonpharmacologic Providers, Use of Nonpharmacologic Pain Treatments, and High-risk Opioid Prescription Patterns Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Ruchir N Karmali; Asheley C Skinner; Justin G Trogdon; Morris Weinberger; Steven Z George; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Opioid Management: Initiating, Monitoring, and Tapering.

Authors:  W Michael Hooten
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 1.784

3.  Capsule Commentary on Sullivan et al., Primary Care Opioid Taper Plans Are Associated with Sustained Opioid Dose Reduction.

Authors:  Jessica A Chen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Identification of barriers to safe opioid prescribing in primary care: a qualitative analysis of field notes collected through academic detailing.

Authors:  Christopher D Saffore; Sarette T Tilton; Stephanie Y Crawford; Michael A Fischer; Todd A Lee; A Simon Pickard; Lisa K Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Capsule Commentary on Odineal et al., Effect of Mobile Device-Assisted N-of-1 Trial Participation on Analgesic Prescribing for Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michelle S Keller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis.

Authors:  Stefan G Kertesz; Ajay Manhapra; Adam J Gordon
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  The role of substance use disorders in experiencing a repeat opioid overdose, and substance use treatment patterns among patients with a non-fatal opioid overdose.

Authors:  Ruchir N Karmali; G Thomas Ray; Andrea L Rubinstein; Stacy A Sterling; Constance M Weisner; Cynthia I Campbell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  Prescription Opioid Dispensing Patterns Prior to Heroin Overdose in a State Medicaid Program: a Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Daniel M Hartung; Kirbee A Johnston; Sara Hallvik; Gillian Leichtling; Jonah Geddes; Christi Hildebran; Shellie Keast; Brian Chan; P Todd Korthuis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Changes in Opioid Prescribing Patterns Among Generalists and Oncologists for Medicare Part D Beneficiaries From 2013 to 2017.

Authors:  Ankit Agarwal; Andrew Roberts; Stacie B Dusetzina; Trevor J Royce
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.