Literature DB >> 30690368

Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan.

Jie Dou1, Ali P Yunus2, Dieu Tien Bui3, Abdelaziz Merghadi4, Mehebub Sahana5, Zhongfan Zhu6, Chi-Wen Chen7, Khabat Khosravi8, Yong Yang9, Binh Thai Pham10.   

Abstract

Landslides represent a part of the cascade of geological hazards in a wide range of geo-environments. In this study, we aim to investigate and compare the performance of two state-of-the-art machine learning models, i.e., decision tree (DT) and random forest (RF) approaches to model the massive rainfall-triggered landslide occurrences in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan at a regional scale. At first, a landslide inventory map is prepared consisting of 44 landslide polygons (10,444 pixels) from aerial photo-interpretation and field surveys. To estimate the robustness of the models, we randomly adapted two different samples (S1 and S2), comprising of both positive and negative cells (70% of total landslides - 7293 pixels) for training and remaining (30%-3151 pixels) for validation. Twelve causative factors including altitude, slope angle, slope aspect, plan curvature, total curvature, compound topographic index, stream power index, distance to drainage network, drainage density, distance to geological boundaries, lithology and cumulative rainfall were selected as predictors to implement the landslide susceptibility model. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves (AUC) and other statistical signifiers were used to verify the model accuracies. The result shows that the DT and RF models achieved remarkable predictive performance (AUC > 0.9), producing near accurate susceptibility maps. The overall efficiency of RF (AUC = 0.956) is found significantly higher than the DT (AUC = 0.928) results. Additionally, we noticed that the performance of RF for modeling landslide susceptibility is very robust even though the training and validation samples are altered. Considering the performances, we suggest that both RF and DT models can be used in other similar non-eruption-related landslide studies in the tephra-deposited rich volcanoes, as they are capable of rapidly generating accurate and stable LSM maps for risk mitigation, management practices, and decision-making. Moreover, the RF-based model is promising and enough to be recommended as a method to map regional landslide susceptibility.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision tree; Izu-Oshima Volcano Island; Machine learning; Rainfall-induced landslide; Random forest; Susceptibility

Year:  2019        PMID: 30690368     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  12 in total

1.  Attribute selection using correlations and principal components for artificial neural networks employment for landslide susceptibility assessment.

Authors:  Luísa Vieira Lucchese; Guilherme Garcia de Oliveira; Olavo Correa Pedrollo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  A Novel Hybrid Model for Predicting Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Based on k-Nearest Neighbors and Particle Swarm Optimization.

Authors:  Xuan-Nam Bui; Pirat Jaroonpattanapong; Hoang Nguyen; Quang-Hieu Tran; Nguyen Quoc Long
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A Framework for Modeling Flood Depth Using a Hybrid of Hydraulics and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Hossein Hosseiny; Foad Nazari; Virginia Smith; C Nataraj
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms.

Authors:  Viet-Ha Nhu; Ataollah Shirzadi; Himan Shahabi; Sushant K Singh; Nadhir Al-Ansari; John J Clague; Abolfazl Jaafari; Wei Chen; Shaghayegh Miraki; Jie Dou; Chinh Luu; Krzysztof Górski; Binh Thai Pham; Huu Duy Nguyen; Baharin Bin Ahmad
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Land use classification of open-pit mine based on multi-scale segmentation and random forest model.

Authors:  Xianyu Yu; Kaixiang Zhang; Yanghui Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Poplar's Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science.

Authors:  Xuelin Xie; Xinye Zhang; Jingfang Shen; Kebing Du
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran.

Authors:  Bahareh Ghasemian; Himan Shahabi; Ataollah Shirzadi; Nadhir Al-Ansari; Abolfazl Jaafari; Victoria R Kress; Marten Geertsema; Somayeh Renoud; Anuar Ahmad
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China.

Authors:  Xiaoting Zhou; Weicheng Wu; Ziyu Lin; Guiliang Zhang; Renxiang Chen; Yong Song; Zhiling Wang; Tao Lang; Yaozu Qin; Penghui Ou; Wenchao Huangfu; Yang Zhang; Lifeng Xie; Xiaolan Huang; Xiao Fu; Jie Li; Jingheng Jiang; Ming Zhang; Yixuan Liu; Shanling Peng; Chongjian Shao; Yonghui Bai; Xiaofeng Zhang; Xiangtong Liu; Wenheng Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).

Authors:  Yue Wang; Deliang Sun; Haijia Wen; Hong Zhang; Fengtai Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  A Novel Performance Assessment Approach Using Photogrammetric Techniques for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Logistic Regression, ANN and Random Forest.

Authors:  Eray Sevgen; Sultan Kocaman; Hakan A Nefeslioglu; Candan Gokceoglu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.