Antoine Chaillon1, Elizabeth B Rand2, Nancy Reau3, Natasha K Martin1,4. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Illinois, Chicago. 4. Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus' (HCV) chronic prevalence among pregnant women in the United States doubled nationally from 2009-2014 (~0.7%), yet many cases remain undiagnosed. Screening pregnant women is not recommended by the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, despite new American Association For the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommending screening for this group. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of HCV screening for pregnant women in the United States. METHODS: An HCV natural history Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of universal HCV screening of pregnant women, followed by treatment after pregnancy, compared to background risk-based screening from a health-care payer perspective. We assumed a HCV chronic prevalence of 0.73% among pregnant women, based on national data. We assumed no Medicaid reimbursement restrictions by fibrosis stage at baseline, but explored differing restrictions in sensitivity analyses. We assessed costs (in US dollars) and health outcomes (in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) over a lifetime horizon, using new HCV drug costs of $25 000/treatment. We assessed mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY gained. We additionally evaluated the potential population impact. RESULTS: Universal antenatal screening was cost-effective in all treatment eligibility scenarios (mean ICER <$3000/QALY gained). Screening remained cost-effective at a prevalence of 0.07%, which is the lowest estimated prevalence in the United States (in Hawaii). Screening the ~5.04 million pregnant women in 2018 could result in the detection and treatment of 33 000 women, based on current fibrosis restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Universal screening for HCV among pregnant women in the United States is cost-effective and should be recommended nationally.
BACKGROUND:Hepatitis C virus' (HCV) chronic prevalence among pregnant women in the United States doubled nationally from 2009-2014 (~0.7%), yet many cases remain undiagnosed. Screening pregnant women is not recommended by the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, despite new American Association For the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommending screening for this group. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of HCV screening for pregnant women in the United States. METHODS: An HCV natural history Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of universal HCV screening of pregnant women, followed by treatment after pregnancy, compared to background risk-based screening from a health-care payer perspective. We assumed a HCV chronic prevalence of 0.73% among pregnant women, based on national data. We assumed no Medicaid reimbursement restrictions by fibrosis stage at baseline, but explored differing restrictions in sensitivity analyses. We assessed costs (in US dollars) and health outcomes (in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) over a lifetime horizon, using new HCV drug costs of $25 000/treatment. We assessed mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY gained. We additionally evaluated the potential population impact. RESULTS: Universal antenatal screening was cost-effective in all treatment eligibility scenarios (mean ICER <$3000/QALY gained). Screening remained cost-effective at a prevalence of 0.07%, which is the lowest estimated prevalence in the United States (in Hawaii). Screening the ~5.04 million pregnant women in 2018 could result in the detection and treatment of 33 000 women, based on current fibrosis restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Universal screening for HCV among pregnant women in the United States is cost-effective and should be recommended nationally.
Authors: Elizabeth E Krans; Susan L Zickmund; Vinod K Rustgi; Seo Young Park; Shannon L Dunn; Eleanor B Schwarz Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Maxine M Denniston; Ruth B Jiles; Jan Drobeniuc; R Monina Klevens; John W Ward; Geraldine M McQuillan; Scott D Holmberg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Adriaan J van der Meer; Bart J Veldt; Jordan J Feld; Heiner Wedemeyer; Jean-François Dufour; Frank Lammert; Andres Duarte-Rojo; E Jenny Heathcote; Michael P Manns; Lorenz Kuske; Stefan Zeuzem; W Peter Hofmann; Robert J de Knegt; Bettina E Hansen; Harry L A Janssen Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-12-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christopher A K Y Chong; Anar Gulamhussein; E Jenny Heathcote; Les Lilly; Morris Sherman; Gary Naglie; Murray Krahn Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Bruce R Schackman; Sarah Gutkind; Jake R Morgan; Jared A Leff; Czarina N Behrends; Kevin L Delucchi; Courtney McKnight; David C Perlman; Carmen L Masson; Benjamin P Linas Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Susan M Lopata; Elizabeth McNeer; Judith A Dudley; Carolyn Wester; William O Cooper; James G Carlucci; Claudia M Espinosa; William Dupont; Stephen W Patrick Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mona Prasad; George R Saade; Grecio Sandoval; Brenna L Hughes; Uma M Reddy; Lisa Mele; Ashley Salazar; Michael W Varner; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Geeta K Swamy; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Alan M Peaceman; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Jay D Iams; Ronald S Gibbs; Baha Sibai; Nicholas Wiese; Saleem Kamili; George A Macones Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.623
Authors: Arpan A Patel; Aileen Bui; Eian Prohl; Debika Bhattacharya; Su Wang; Andrea D Branch; Ponni V Perumalswami Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2020-12-07