Zachary R Smith1, Krishna Rangarajan1, Jennifer Barrow2, Danielle Carter3, James C Coons4, Amy L Dzierba5, Jennifer Falvey6, Keith A Fester7, Maria R Guido8, Diana Hao9, Narith N Ou10, Kristen T Pogue11, Nancy C MacDonald1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. 2. Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Department of Pharmacy Services, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 4. Department of Pharmacy, UPMC Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, and University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Department of Pharmacy, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 6. Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY. 7. Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO. 8. Department of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 9. Department of Pharmacy Services, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA. 10. Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 11. Department of Pharmacy, University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Delphi method was used to develop best practice recommendations (BPR) for safe use of pulmonary hypertension (PH) pharmacotherapies and to describe the pharmacist's role in provision of care. METHODS: A core group reviewed PH medication-safety literature and developed initial BPR. Pharmacists practicing at PH-accredited Centers of Comprehensive Care who met defined PH expert criteria were invited to participate on an expert panel. In round 1 of a 4-round Delphi process, expert input was provided on the BPR. Feedback was incorporated into BPR for the next round. Round 2 proceeded in identical fashion to round 1. In round 3, BPR were deliberated in a teleconference and underwent voting at the cessation of the round using a 5-point Likert scale. Median scores of < 2.5, 2.5-3.75, and > 3.75 resulted in a best practice statement being rejected, reviewed in round 4, or accepted in the final BPR, respectively. In round 4, the remaining BPR were discussed and underwent voting. BPR were assigned a level of evidence and strength of recommendation based on voting results. RESULTS: Eleven PH experts agreed to participate and met expert inclusion criteria, along with 2 pharmacists from the core group, bringing the total number of expert panel members to 13. To guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies, 26 BPR were developed, categorized into 5 practice domains, comprising the PH Care Center accreditation process, inpatient practice, formulary management, diagnostics, and ambulatory care. BPR included provisions for safe use of parenteral prostacyclin agents and healthcare practitioner education. CONCLUSION: The Delphi method was used to develop BPR to guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies.
PURPOSE: The Delphi method was used to develop best practice recommendations (BPR) for safe use of pulmonary hypertension (PH) pharmacotherapies and to describe the pharmacist's role in provision of care. METHODS: A core group reviewed PH medication-safety literature and developed initial BPR. Pharmacists practicing at PH-accredited Centers of Comprehensive Care who met defined PH expert criteria were invited to participate on an expert panel. In round 1 of a 4-round Delphi process, expert input was provided on the BPR. Feedback was incorporated into BPR for the next round. Round 2 proceeded in identical fashion to round 1. In round 3, BPR were deliberated in a teleconference and underwent voting at the cessation of the round using a 5-point Likert scale. Median scores of < 2.5, 2.5-3.75, and > 3.75 resulted in a best practice statement being rejected, reviewed in round 4, or accepted in the final BPR, respectively. In round 4, the remaining BPR were discussed and underwent voting. BPR were assigned a level of evidence and strength of recommendation based on voting results. RESULTS: Eleven PH experts agreed to participate and met expert inclusion criteria, along with 2 pharmacists from the core group, bringing the total number of expert panel members to 13. To guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies, 26 BPR were developed, categorized into 5 practice domains, comprising the PH Care Center accreditation process, inpatient practice, formulary management, diagnostics, and ambulatory care. BPR included provisions for safe use of parenteral prostacyclin agents and healthcare practitioner education. CONCLUSION: The Delphi method was used to develop BPR to guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies.
Authors: Kari R Gillmeyer; Seppo T Rinne; Mark E Glickman; Kyung Min Lee; Qing Shao; Shirley X Qian; Elizabeth S Klings; Bradley A Maron; Joseph T Hanlon; Donald R Miller; Renda Soylemez Wiener Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-05-12