Eunjung Lee1, Margaret Gatz2, Chiuchen Tseng1, Lon S Schneider3,4,5, Sonia Pawluczyk5, Anna H Wu1, Dennis Deapen1. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. USC Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. USC Davis School of Gerontology, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medicare claims record linkage has been used to identify diagnosed dementia cases in order to estimate dementia prevalence and cost of care. Claims records in the 1990 s and early 2000 s have been found to provide 85% - ∼90% sensitivity and specificity. OBJECTIVE: Considering that dementia awareness has improved over time, we sought to examine sensitivity and specificity of more recent Medicare claims records against a standard criterion, clinical diagnosis of dementia. METHODS: For a sample of patients evaluated at the University of Southern California Alzheimer Disease Research Center (ADRC), we performed database linkage with Medicare claims files for a six-year period, 2007-2012. We used clinical diagnosis at the ADRC as the criterion diagnosis in order to calculate sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Medicare claims correctly identified 85% of dementia patients and 77% of individuals with normal cognition. About half of patients clinically diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment had dementia diagnoses in Medicare claims. Misclassified dementia patients (i.e., missed diagnosis by Medicare claims) had more favorable Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating scores and were less likely to present behavioral symptoms than correctly-classified dementia patients. CONCLUSIONS: Database linkage to Medicare claims records is an efficient and reasonably accurate tool to identify dementia cases in a population-based cohort. However, possibilities of obtaining biased results due to misclassification of dementia status need to be carefully considered to use Medicare claims diagnosis for etiologic research studies. Additional confirmation of dementia diagnosis may also be considered. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.
BACKGROUND: Medicare claims record linkage has been used to identify diagnosed dementia cases in order to estimate dementia prevalence and cost of care. Claims records in the 1990 s and early 2000 s have been found to provide 85% - ∼90% sensitivity and specificity. OBJECTIVE: Considering that dementia awareness has improved over time, we sought to examine sensitivity and specificity of more recent Medicare claims records against a standard criterion, clinical diagnosis of dementia. METHODS: For a sample of patients evaluated at the University of Southern California Alzheimer Disease Research Center (ADRC), we performed database linkage with Medicare claims files for a six-year period, 2007-2012. We used clinical diagnosis at the ADRC as the criterion diagnosis in order to calculate sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Medicare claims correctly identified 85% of dementia patients and 77% of individuals with normal cognition. About half of patients clinically diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment had dementia diagnoses in Medicare claims. Misclassified dementia patients (i.e., missed diagnosis by Medicare claims) had more favorable Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating scores and were less likely to present behavioral symptoms than correctly-classified dementia patients. CONCLUSIONS: Database linkage to Medicare claims records is an efficient and reasonably accurate tool to identify dementia cases in a population-based cohort. However, possibilities of obtaining biased results due to misclassification of dementia status need to be carefully considered to use Medicare claims diagnosis for etiologic research studies. Additional confirmation of dementia diagnosis may also be considered. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.
Entities:
Keywords:
Data linkage; Medicare; dementia; sensitivity and specificity
Authors: Pei-Jung Lin; Daniel I Kaufer; Matthew L Maciejewski; Rahul Ganguly; John E Paul; Andrea K Biddle Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Peter Johannsen; Kasper Jørgensen; Alex Kørner; Elisabeth G Elmo; Lene B Lauesen; Jan Utzon Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Howard Fillit; David S Geldmacher; Richard Todd Welter; Katie Maslow; Malcolm Fraser Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sudha Seshadri; Alexa Beiser; Rhoda Au; Philip A Wolf; Denis A Evans; Robert S Wilson; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman; Walter A Rocca; Claudia H Kawas; Maria M Corrada; Brenda L Plassman; Kenneth M Langa; Helena C Chui Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Sandra Weintraub; David Salmon; Nathaniel Mercaldo; Steven Ferris; Neill R Graff-Radford; Helena Chui; Jeffrey Cummings; Charles DeCarli; Norman L Foster; Douglas Galasko; Elaine Peskind; Woodrow Dietrich; Duane L Beekly; Walter A Kukull; John C Morris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2009 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Momotazur Rahman; Elizabeth M White; Caroline Mills; Kali S Thomas; Eric Jutkowitz Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kelly C Bishop; Sehba Husain-Krautter; Jonathan D Ketcham; Nicolai V Kuminoff; Corbett Schimming Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Cassandra L Hua; Kali S Thomas; Jennifer N Bunker; Pedro L Gozalo; Emmanuelle Bélanger; Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Pei-Jung Lin; Joanna Emerson; Jessica D Faul; Joshua T Cohen; Peter J Neumann; Howard M Fillit; Allan T Daly; Nikoletta Margaretos; Karen M Freund Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Siddharth Jain; Paul R Rosenbaum; Joseph G Reiter; Geoffrey Hoffman; Dylan S Small; Jinkyung Ha; Alexander S Hill; David A Wolk; Timothy Gaulton; Mark D Neuman; Roderic G Eckenhoff; Lee A Fleisher; Jeffrey H Silber Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Pei-Jung Lin; Allan T Daly; Natalia Olchanski; Joshua T Cohen; Peter J Neumann; Jessica D Faul; Howard M Fillit; Karen M Freund Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 3.178