Literature DB >> 30688873

Specificity and Transfer of Lower-Body Strength: Influence of Bilateral or Unilateral Lower-Body Resistance Training.

Brendyn B Appleby1,2, Stuart J Cormack3, Robert U Newton1,4.   

Abstract

Appleby, BB, Cormack, SJ, and Newton, RU. Specificity and transfer of lower-body strength: Influence of bilateral or unilateral lower-body resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 33(2): 318-326, 2019-To examine the development of lower-body strength using either bilateral or unilateral resistance training. Developmental rugby players (n = 33; mean training age = 5.4 ± 2.9 years; 1 repetition maximum [1RM] 90° squat = 178 ± 27 kg) completed an 18-week randomized controlled training design (bilateral group [BIL], n = 13; unilateral group [UNI], n = 10; comparison, n = 10). The 8-week training phase involved 2 lower-body, volume-load matched resistance sessions per week (6-8 sets × 4-8 reps at 45-88% 1RM), differing only in the prescription of a bilateral (back squat) or unilateral (step-up) resistance exercise. Maximum strength was assessed by a randomized order of 1RM back squat and step-up testing and analyzed for within- and between-group differences using effect sizes (ES ± 90% confidence limits [CL]). Both training groups showed practically important improvements in their trained exercise (ES ± 90% CL: BIL = 0.67 ± 0.48; UNI = 0.74 ± 0.38) with transfer to their nontrained resistance exercise (BIL step-up = 0.27 ± 0.39: UNI squat = 0.42 ± 0.39). The difference between groups in adaptation of squat strength was unclear (BIL ES = -0.34 ± 0.55), while the UNI group showed an advantage in step-up training (ES = 0.41 ± 0.36). The results demonstrate that practically important increases in lower-body strength can be achieved using bilateral or unilateral resistance training and development of that strength may be expressed in the movement not trained, supporting the transfer of strength training between exercises of similar joint movements and muscles. Coaches may choose to incorporate unilateral strength training where the prescription of bilateral training may be inhibited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30688873     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Effects of Bilateral and Unilateral Resistance Training on Horizontally Orientated Movement Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason Moran; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Bernard Liew; Helmi Chaabene; David G Behm; Antonio García-Hermoso; Mikel Izquierdo; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Internal Validity in Resistance Training Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hubert Makaruk; Marcin Starzak; Maciej Płaszewski; Jason B Winchester
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

3.  Muscle activity of Bulgarian squat. Effects of additional vibration, suspension and unstable surface.

Authors:  Joan Aguilera-Castells; Bernat Buscà; Jose Morales; Mònica Solana-Tramunt; Azahara Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe; Fernando Rey-Abella; Jaume Bantulà; Javier Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Rapid muscle activation changes across a competitive collegiate female soccer season.

Authors:  Kazuma Akehi; Eric C Conchola; Ty B Palmer; Brennan J Thompson
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.