Joshua R Lakin1,2,3, Emily Benotti1, Joanna Paladino1,2, Natalie Henrich1, Justin Sanders1,2,3. 1. 1 Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. 2 Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. 3 Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Background: Evidence demonstrates that discussion between clinicians and seriously ill patients about their goals and preferences, or serious illness communication, is a high-value intervention, resulting in growing demand for improvement in this area. Promising efforts address this demand utilizing interprofessional teams; yet, we lack insight into how different professions work together to deliver better serious illness communication. Objective: To explore the perceptions of primary care clinicians about interprofessional work in serious illness communication. Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured key informant interviews. Settings/Subjects: Primary care clinicians (physicians, care coordination nurses, and social workers) who have experience implementing a structured primary palliative care program, the Serious Illness Care Program, at a large academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. Results: We derived primary themes and subthemes from participant descriptions of program implementation: the importance and value of interprofessional teams, nurses, and individual initiative; the role of preparation and structure in enabling high-quality communication; and the ways in which attempts to improve serious illness communication reveal other problems that can limit program effectiveness or be perceived as program failures. We derived a conceptual model that illustrates the relationships between interprofessional team interactions, workflows, and perceived program outcomes. Conclusions: This study suggests three key areas of focus for design and implementation of programs aimed at improving serious illness conversations by interprofessional primary care teams: establishing clear professional roles and responsibilities, paying special attention to interprofessional and clinician-patient relationships, and clearly structuring interventions aiming to change the way our system drives serious illness communication.
Background: Evidence demonstrates that discussion between clinicians and seriously ill patients about their goals and preferences, or serious illness communication, is a high-value intervention, resulting in growing demand for improvement in this area. Promising efforts address this demand utilizing interprofessional teams; yet, we lack insight into how different professions work together to deliver better serious illness communication. Objective: To explore the perceptions of primary care clinicians about interprofessional work in serious illness communication. Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured key informant interviews. Settings/Subjects: Primary care clinicians (physicians, care coordination nurses, and social workers) who have experience implementing a structured primary palliative care program, the Serious Illness Care Program, at a large academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. Results: We derived primary themes and subthemes from participant descriptions of program implementation: the importance and value of interprofessional teams, nurses, and individual initiative; the role of preparation and structure in enabling high-quality communication; and the ways in which attempts to improve serious illness communication reveal other problems that can limit program effectiveness or be perceived as program failures. We derived a conceptual model that illustrates the relationships between interprofessional team interactions, workflows, and perceived program outcomes. Conclusions: This study suggests three key areas of focus for design and implementation of programs aimed at improving serious illness conversations by interprofessional primary care teams: establishing clear professional roles and responsibilities, paying special attention to interprofessional and clinician-patient relationships, and clearly structuring interventions aiming to change the way our system drives serious illness communication.
Entities:
Keywords:
advance care planning; interdisciplinary work; interprofessional work; primary palliative care; qualitative research; serious illness communication
Authors: Andrew Lagrotteria; Marilyn Swinton; Jessica Simon; Seema King; Gwenn Boryski; Irene Wai Yan Ma; Fiona Dunne; Japteg Singh; Rachelle E Bernacki; John J You Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-08-02
Authors: Jennifer Dickman Portz; Hillary D Lum; Sheana Bull; Rebecca S Boxer; David B Bekelman; Kelsey L Ford; Kathy Gleason; Alejandra Casillas; Elizabeth A Bayliss Journal: J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care Date: 2020-06-01