Literature DB >> 30687651

Percutaneous Arthroscopic-assisted Glenoid Fixation: A Novel Surgical Technique.

Adam Tucker1, Kevin Donnelly1, Lynn Murphy1, Gary Ferguson1, Sam Sloan1, Phil Charlwood1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Scapular fractures are rare injuries and are often an indicator of high-energy trauma. These injuries are rare, and many are managed without surgery. The caveat to this is intra-articular extension into the glenoid when AO Foundation principles of fracture fixation for intra-articular injuries must be adhered to. We report a percutaneous arthroscopically assisted technique for fixation of a scapular fracture with extension into the glenoid fossa in a young male patient. CASE REPORT: A 22-year-old Caucasian male presented to the emergency department after a road traffic collision. Primary assessment and secondary surgery demonstrated an isolated shoulder injury involving the glenoid. Three-dimensional imaging was performed and revealed an intra-articular glenoid fracture with the involvement of the superior suspensory apparatus of the shoulder, not fitting into known classification systems. He underwent an arthroscopically assisted percutaneous screw fixation, which resulted in reduction of the suspensory apparatus and the glenoid fossa.
CONCLUSION: Intra-articular glenoid involvement in scapular fractures mandates anatomical reduction through internal fixation. We highlight that this technique is of benefit in these injuries and is easy and quick to perform. Validated outcomes, in this case, have been excellent, with no adverse events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic assisted; fixation; glenoid; percutaneous; trauma

Year:  2018        PMID: 30687651      PMCID: PMC6343562          DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.1132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep        ISSN: 2250-0685


Learning Point for the Article: An arthroscopic assisted, percutaneous technique demonstrates excellent medium term outcomes for intra articulate glenoid.

Introduction

Scapular fractures are rare injuries and typically result from high-energy trauma such as road traffic accidents and falls from height[1]. Accurate classification of these fractures, based on radiological imaging, facilitates optimum management and long-term shoulder function. We present a unique case of scapular fracture which does not fit entirely with any existing classifications. This was treated with a unique arthroscopically assisted, percutaneous fixation technique with excellent post-operative patient-reported outcomes.

Case Report

A 22-year-old male presented to casualty with the left shoulder pain following a road traffic accident. Examination revealed reduced movements of the left shoulder in all planes. Neurovascular examination was unremarkable and no other injuries identified. Radiographs revealed anintra-articular fracture of the left scapula with disruption of the acromioclavicular joint (Fig. 1a). To help further assess the extent of injury, computed tomography with 3D reconstruction was performed which showed a comminuted fracture of the scapula involving the glenoid and body of the scapula (Fig. 1b).
Figure 1

(a)Plain anteroposteriorradiograph illustrating the intra-articular scapular fracture with acromioclavicular joint disruption. (B)3D CT (anterior view) demonstrating a comminuted scapular fracture involving the glenoid.

(a)Plain anteroposteriorradiograph illustrating the intra-articular scapular fracture with acromioclavicular joint disruption. (B)3D CT (anterior view) demonstrating a comminuted scapular fracture involving the glenoid. The patient underwent surgical fixation using a unique technique for repair of an intra-articular glenoid fracture with reduction of an associated acromioclavicular disruption.

Surgical technique

The procedure was performed in the “beach chair” position under general anesthesia. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis, as per unit policy, was administered. Standard anterior and posterior arthroscopic port sites allowed for direct visualization of the glenoid and facilitated washout of the fracture hematoma (Fig. 2a and b). Pre-operative concerns were of a capsular tear which would risk fluid extravasation around the brachial plexus. However, at the time of arthroscopy, the capsule was found to be intact. Once the fracture site was thoroughly debrided, a single 2.5mm threaded guidewire was placed in the superior-inferior plane percutaneously to act as a joystick to reduce the large fragment. When the guidewire was in position, two 2mm Kirschner wires were used to hold the fragment in place. Three 4.5mm low profile, partially threaded cannulated screws (Arthrex, FL, USA)were inserted percutaneously. One screw failed at the thread-shaft junction during insertion with the distal part being left in situ, providing compression to the fracture site and restoration of stability. The remaining screws achieved compression at the fracture site, which were visualized simultaneously with the arthroscope, restoring the articular surface and reduction of the acromioclavicular joint (Fig. 2c). Clinical follow-up was performed postoperatively, and validated subjective functional scores completed by one of the authors, either in person or through telephone consultation with the patient. Correlation from time to surgery and outcome scores was recorded and P value calculated for the progression over time. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 2

(a)Intraoperative arthroscopic image of the glenoid fracture before washout and removal of the fracture hematoma. (b) After washout, the intra-articular fracture of the glenoid can be clearly seen. There is evidence of intra-articular loose bodies (c) Arthroscopic view of the articular surface after reduction with three percutaneous screws.

(a)Intraoperative arthroscopic image of the glenoid fracture before washout and removal of the fracture hematoma. (b) After washout, the intra-articular fracture of the glenoid can be clearly seen. There is evidence of intra-articular loose bodies (c) Arthroscopic view of the articular surface after reduction with three percutaneous screws.

Discussion

Scapular fractures are uncommon comprising 3–% of shoulder fractures and <1% of all fractures [1]. This is largely due to its mobility on the chest wall, protection provided by muscles, and the surrounding musculoskeletal structures, including the clavicle and acromioclavicular joint, which typically give way first following injury. Fractures of the scapula and glenoid cavity usually require direct high-energy trauma, with road traffic collisions causing more than 60% of these injuries [1]. Not surprisingly, more than 80% of patients with a scapular fracture have associated injuries which may be life-threatening [2, 3]. Only a few classifications exist for scapular fractures, largely due to their infrequent occurrence. Existing classifications typically relate to the anatomical region involved based on radiographic findings. The orthopedic trauma association classification for scapular fractures describes extra-articular, intra-articular, and combined fracture patterns[4]. In addition, Ideberg, Mayo et al., and Goss, each describe intra-art icular scapular fractures[5, 6, 7]. The aforementioned fracture pattern lies somewhere between the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification 14-C3, Ideberg Type III, and Goss Type III [4, 5, 8]. Goss also introduced the concept of the superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC) to help identify patterns of certain shoulder injuries and guide management[6]. The SSSC refers to a ring of bony and soft tissue structures, namely the glenoid, coracoid process, coracoclavicular ligament, distal part of the clavicle, acromioclavicular joint, and acromion process[6]. Goss maintained that disruption of two or more components of the complex would result in an unstable or “floating” shoulder, commonly requiring surgical treatment[6]. However, recent experience suggests that if there is significant displacement of a scapular fracture, particularly the glenoid, surgical management should be considered to help prevent functional disability [6, 9]. In the above case, not only was there an intra-articular fracture of the glenoid, but the patient also had acromioclavicular disruption requiring surgical intervention. Ideberg’s original classification describes a Type III fracture that is an oblique fracture through the glenoid exiting superiorly. It has been modified to include an associated acromioclavicular joint injury in recent years. Ogawa described a Type Icoracoid injury, whereby the fracture is proximal to the coracoclavicular ligament. The injury seen above, in this case, does not conform to either yet bears hallmarks of both. This is the first reported case of a glenoid fracture with associated acromioclavicular joint disruption, both of which were corrected by a percutaneous approach. Open reduction and internal fixation of the scapula is indicated in displaced fractures the extend into the glenoid articular surface if a step of >3mm is encountered, and more than 20% of the joint is involved[10]. Other indications include as follows: Unstable shoulder girdle based on multiple disruptions of the superior SSSC- the so-called “floating” shoulder. Medialization>10mm. Angular deformity of 25–° [6, 11, 12]. Arthroscopic repair of the shoulder joint is commonly described in the surgical treatment of glenoid labrum injuries; however, there have only been small case reports and case series regarding arthroscopic-assisted fixation of scapula fractures. There is a reported case of Kirchner wire fixation of a glenoid fracture[13]. Fewer reports have looked specifically at percutaneous internal fixation of fracture[13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. In a small series of patients, Ideberg Type IA intra-articular glenoid fractures have been repaired by arthroscopy-assisted techniques with excellent results in 70% of individuals, with low complication rates [12]. Arthroscopic-assisted surgical fixation of Ideberg Type III glenoid fractures is reported to be a safe and effective method of treatment, yielding excellent functional results with union of the fractures, with few associated complications as a result of the surgery [17]. A cadaveric study demonstrated that superiorly placed percutaneous fixation, as in this case, represents a safe approach to fixation of the glenoid arthroscopically[18].

Patient outcome

Follow-up of the patient at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 30 months was performed. Functional outcomes scores including constant score, Oxford shoulder, and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) were performed. Radiographs at 3 months and 30 months are shown in Fig. 3. Table 1 summarizes the functional scores over time, which has shown significant improvement during the post-operative period. In the case of negative correlations, this showed that reductions in the difference in DASH scores between shoulders occurred over time, indicating a return of normal function. Currently, the patients have returned to work as a manual shop assistant, plays rugby and cricket, with no pain, functional limitation, or restriction on activities of daily living.
Figure 3

(a and b) Radiographs of the glenohumeral joint anteroposterior (AP) and shoulder axial views at 3 months post-surgery. (candd)Radiographs of the glenohumeral joint AP and shoulder axial views at 30 months post-surgery.

Table 1

Patient-reported outcome scores for the Oxford shoulder, Constant shoulder score, and DASH

(a and b) Radiographs of the glenohumeral joint anteroposterior (AP) and shoulder axial views at 3 months post-surgery. (candd)Radiographs of the glenohumeral joint AP and shoulder axial views at 30 months post-surgery. Patient-reported outcome scores for the Oxford shoulder, Constant shoulder score, and DASH

Conclusion

We describe a unique case of an unclassified isolated scapular fracture in a young male, involving the glenoid fossa and associated acromioclavicular joint disruption. This posed a challenge regarding management due to a lack of specific guidelines and available data on functional outcomes. We report the first case involving a unique approach for arthroscopic-assisted repair of an intra-articular glenoid fracture, with subsequent reduction of the acromioclavicular joint, using percutaneous, variable pitched headless screws. While the body of literature available consists of small number case series only, arthroscopic repair of intra-articular glenoid fractures is an effective technique for the experienced surgeon, associated with good functional outcomes. We, therefore, advocate arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous screw fixation for intra-articular glenoid fractures. Clinical Message Scapula fractures involving the glenoid require anatomical reduction and fixation in keeping with AO principles. This can be achieved through an arthroscopically assisted technique as described, with excellent medium-term outcomes.
  15 in total

1.  Delayed operative management of fractures of the scapula.

Authors:  D A Herrera; J Anavian; I S Tarkin; B A Armitage; L K Schroder; P A Cole
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-05

2.  Arthroscopic-assisted reduction and percutaneous external fixation of a displaced intra-articular glenoid fracture.

Authors:  L P Carro; M P Nuñez; J I Llata
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Scapular Fractures and Dislocations: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Causes of scapula fractures differ from other shoulder injuries in occupants seriously injured during motor vehicle crashes.

Authors:  Raul Coimbra; Carol Conroy; Gail T Tominaga; Vishal Bansal; Alexandra Schwartz
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Arthroscopy-assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation of a multiple glenoid fracture.

Authors:  Antonio Gigante; Mario Marinelli; Aldo Verdenelli; Emanuele Lupetti; Francesco Greco
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopically assisted fixation of glenoid fractures: a cadaver study to show potential applications of percutaneous screw insertion and anatomic risks.

Authors:  Daniel Marsland; Hasan A Ahmed
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Scapula fractures: a marker for concomitant injury? A retrospective review of data in the National Trauma Database.

Authors:  Keith D Baldwin; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Samir Mehta; Eric Hume
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-08

8.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Arthroscopic screw fixation of large anterior glenoid fractures.

Authors:  Mark Tauber; Mohamed Moursy; Manfred Eppel; Heiko Koller; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Multiple-region scapular fractures had more severe chest injury than single-region fractures: a prospective study of 107 blunt trauma patients.

Authors:  Ayman M A Tadros; Karl Lunsjo; Janusz Czechowski; Fikri M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.