Literature DB >> 30687549

Sutureless Intrascleral Haptic-Hook Lens Implantation Using 25-Gauge Trocars.

Zhi-Xiang Hu1, HaiShuang Lin1, Lingying Ye1, Zhong Lin1, Tianyu Chen1, Ke Lin1, Rong-Han Wu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a new technique for sutureless intrascleral fixation of three-piece foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) using 25-gauge trocars.
METHODS: We performed this technique on patients with insufficient posterior capsule support. Seventeen eyes from 15 patients with aphakia, dislocated IOL, or subluxated crystalline lens undergoing posterior chamber sutureless implantation of an IOL were studied. The haptics of the IOL were externalized using two 25-gauge forceps. The haptics were bended back (hook-like) into the vitreous cavity through a scleral incision made by using a 25-gauge trocar. And, IOL tilt was determined by using a slit lamp and UBM, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The IOLs were fixed with exact centration and axial stability. No wound leakage was reported even without the use of sutures. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.82 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units preoperatively, and the mean BCVA was 0.44 logMAR units at the 6-month follow-up visit. No postoperative retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, IOL tilt or dislocation, or vitreous hemorrhage was noted.
CONCLUSION: Sutureless intrascleral haptic-hook posterior chamber IOL implantation using 25-gauge trocars provides good IOL fixation with reliable wound closure without the use of sutures. This trial is registered with ChiCTR1800017436.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30687549      PMCID: PMC6327285          DOI: 10.1155/2018/9250425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2090-004X            Impact factor:   1.909


1. Introduction

Intrascleral fixation of posterior chamber (PC) intraocular lens (IOL) has become more popular, as it has advantages such as minimal trauma to the surrounding tissues, good IOL stabilization decreasing the incidence of IOL tilt along with shorter operation time, and does not require degradable threads which may lead to long-term extraconjunctival exposure [1-5]. The various intrascleral fixation techniques have critical differences in the manner in which the haptic of the IOL is handled [6]. Agarwal et al. and Oh et al. have reported the use of fibrin glue-assisted sutureless IOL scleral fixation combined with scleral flaps for the implantation of PC-IOLs [7, 8]. Takayama et al. have described a modified technique where the IOL haptics are incarcerated into the prepared scleral tunnels instead of a scleral flap, which provides stability for the PC-IOLs [9]. Ohta et al. created a Y-shaped scleral incision to fix the haptic and improved wound closure [10]. We modified the haptic fixation to increase the stability of the IOL haptic by bending the haptics back into the vitreous cavity by 25-gauge vitrectomy to minimize the scleral incisions. And, we performed this modified technique in a series of eyes with aphakia, dislocated IOL, or subluxated crystalline lens. In this article, we report a case series of this technique and its clinical results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

Retrospective Study. The data of patients with aphakia, dislocated IOL, or subluxated crystalline lens who underwent posterior chamber sutureless implantation of an IOL at the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between April 2017 and December 2017 were collected. An informed consent was obtained from all participants. All study procedures adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the patients underwent ophthalmologic examination including measurements of BCVA, slit-lamp examination, and measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) at preoperative and postoperative visits. Ultrasound biomicroscope (UBM) examination was performed at follow-up to evaluate the centration and axial stability of the IOL, and complications were recorded.

2.2. Surgical Procedure

The surgery was performed under retrobulbar anesthesia. The conjunctiva is cut open for 3.0 mm at two points 180° apart, usually at 4 o'clock and 10 o'clock positions, and light scleral cautery is used to achieve adequate hemostasis. Whole or partial vitrectomy will be needed for dislocated IOL or subluxated crystalline lens. Two 25-gauge cannulas are placed exactly 180° apart at 4 o'clock and 10 o'clock and are perpendicularly inserted through the sclera, and pars plana 1.5–2.0 mm away from the limbus (Figure 1(a)), usually 2.0 mm when combined with vitrectomy. This precise positioning is required to ensure good lens centration. This is followed by 25-gauge anterior vitrectomy to remove the prolapsing vitreous in the anterior chamber or the whole vitreous through the cannulas if needed. Subsequently, the cannulas at two points 180° apart are removed, and the 25-gauge trocar blade is used to create 2 ciliary sulcus-based scleral incisions of about 1 mm away from the former scleral incisions at two points 180° apart. These scleral incisions are parallel to the limbus and must be made in a uniplanar manner. Intrasceral grooves are made between the two adjacent scleral incisions (Figure 1(b)).
Figure 1

Photographs showing the haptic-hook lens implantation. (a) Sclerotomy 2.0 mm from the limbus previously created for 25-gauge vitrectomy. (b) Creation of the scleral groove with paracentesis blade. (c) Externalization of the leading haptic with 25-gauge forceps. (d) The haptic is bent and inserted back into the vitreous cavity through the second scleral incision created by a 25-gauge trocar blade. (e) Hide of the haptics to the intrascleral groove. (f) Conjunctival incisions are closed with 8-0 absorbable suture.

A superior 3.0 mm clear main corneal incision and auxiliary corneal incision are made which are used for injection of a 3-piece PC-IOL (Matrix Acrylic Aurium 400; Medennium Inc.; California, USA) into the anterior chamber. The 25-g forceps are passed through the trocar incision at the 4 o'clock position, and the leading haptic is grasped and extracted from the eye (Figure 1(c)). The IOL with the trailing haptic is inserted into the anterior chamber. The trailing haptic is also held with forceps, and both haptics are externalized onto the sclera. The haptics are bent and inserted back into the vitreous cavity through the adjacent scleral incision (Figure 1(d)) while the outer parts of the haptics are perfectly buried in the intrascleral groove (Figure 1(e)). The smooth implementation of the above steps benefits from the flexible haptics of Matrix Acrylic Aurium 400. The material of this haptics is polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), the configuration is modified-C, and the angulation is 5 degrees. All above make bending back the haptics into the vitreous cavity easy. After the closure of the clear main corneal incision with hydration, the conjunctival incisions are closed with 8-0 absorbable sutures (Figure 1(f)). Diagrams of the key steps of the procedure are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Diagram of the surgical procedure.

3. Results and Discussion

Our modified sutureless technique was performed in 15 patients. The technique was combined with vitrectomy to partially or entirely remove the vitreous in all patients. The mean BCVA was 0.82 logMAR units preoperatively and 0.44 logMAR units at the 6-month visit (Table 1). Patients who came back for follow-up showed good lens centration and stable haptic fixation (Figure 3). Complications such as postoperative inflammation, hyphema, decentration, glaucoma, corneal edema, or wound leakage have not been observed in the 6-month follow-up examinations (Table 2). None of the eyes has required subsequent surgical procedures.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics and postoperative data of the patients.

CharacteristicsData
Number of eyes (patients)17 (15)
Age, years56.4 ± 13.5
Male/female, n7/8
Baseline logMAR BCVA0.82 ± 0.89
logMAR BCVA at 6 monthsa0.44 ± 0.45
Baseline IOP, mmHg18.0 ± 3.0
IOP at 1 week, mmHga14.8 ± 7.2
IOP at 6 months, mmHga17.1 ± 2.9

All values stand for mean ± standard deviation. BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure. aCompared by Fisher's exact test; others compared by two-paired test.

Figure 3

Six months postoperative anterior segment examinations. (a) Slit-lamp microscopy showing the scleral wounds. (b) UBM image showing the centration of the lens. (c) UBM image showing the IOL haptic position in the sclera.

Table 2

Clinical features and postoperative surgical outcome of each eyes.

CasesGender/ageOperated eyeAssociated ocular conditions from previous surgeryType of dislocation at presentationPreoperative logMAR BCVAPostoperative logMAR BCVA at 6 monthsPostoperative complications
1M/53RightPCR and sulcus-fixated IOLOut-of-the-bag0.220.50None
2M/46RightPCR and sulcus-fixated IOLIn-the-bag1.301.30None
3M/24LeftPCR and sulcus-fixated IOLOut-of-the-bag0.220.22None
4M/48RightPCR and sulcus-fixated IOLOut-of-the-bag0.050None
5M/48LeftMarchesani syndrome, subluxated crystalline lensIn-the-bag0.100None
6M/75LeftTrauma, aphakicAbsence of capsular bag2.601.30None
7M/58LeftTrauma, aphakicAbsence of capsular bag0.100.22None
8F/53LeftTrauma, luxated crystalline lensOut-of-the-bag0.400.52None
9F/59RightPCR and sulcus-fixated IOLOut-of-the-bag2.300.40None
10F/59LeftPCR and sulcus-fixated IOLOut-of-the-bag2.600.22None
11F/69RightPCR and sulcus-fixated IOLOut-of-the-bag0.700.70None
12M/72LeftSubluxated crystalline lensIn-the-bag1.000.10None
13F/35RightSubluxated crystalline lensIn-the-bag0.400.40None
14F/60RightLuxated crystalline lensIn-the-bag0.100.15None
15F/68RightSubluxated crystalline lensIn-the-bag1.000.52None
16F/60LeftSubluxated crystalline lensIn-the-bag0.000.00None
17F/71RightLuxated crystalline lensIn-the-bag0.801.30None

BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; PCR = posterior capsule rupture.

Intrascleral IOL fixation has frequently been used in eyes with inadequate posterior capsular or zonular support [11], as this technique has advantages over conventional transscleral suturing of the IOL. However, stability of the haptic of the IOL has been reported to be the area of most concern in long-term visits [12]. At the same time, the surgeon must be aware of the thickness of the sclera and perform the technique cautiously, especially in vitrectomized eyes regardless of the use of scleral flaps or tunnels for haptic fixation. We found that scleral tunnels used to hide the haptic might result in several complications, such as slippage of the haptic and intraocular lens pupillary capture. These complications may occur due to high strain of the IOL and a flabby iris over the long term. Yamane et al. [12] have reported similar complications and used a flange to prevent haptic dislocation. In contrast, we used a hook-like fixation assisted by 25-gauge trocars to completely prevent slippage of the greater part of the haptic. And, we could reposition the lens through the flexible haptic bending according to various distances between two incisions, which may be irretrievable in flanged haptic. Because we bury the haptic intrasclerally, patients have less conjunctival irritation compared with exposed flanged haptic. There are many advantages to our modified technique. First, we reduced the number of scleral incisions to minimize wounds when combined with vitrectomy and avoid ocular hypotension after surgery. Multiple incisions may increase outflow of the vitreous humor, especially in vitrectomized and pathologic eyes with myopia. And scleral incision sutures will be necessary under these conditions. A 26-gauge or smaller syringe needle could be used instead of a 25-gauge trocar in noncombined vitrectomy eyes. Second, the haptics are inserted back into the vitreous cavity, which prevent slippage of the haptic, decrease incidence of IOL tilt, and increase stability of IOL. Third, the outer parts of the haptics are perfectly buried in the scleral groove to lower the risk where the IOL haptics are exposed below conjunctiva and get infected. In addition, it is unlikely to damage the haptics of the 3-piece PC-IOL (Matrix Acrylic Aurium 400) when bending the haptics for its flexibility and extensivity. The modified technique does not require degradable threads which may lead to long-term extraconjunctival exposure and simplify the procedure with shorter operation time. The limitation of the study is the number of cases is few and the period of follow-up is too short to evaluate the outcome. And, we judge the IOL tilt by using a slit lamp and UBM instead of optical coherence tomography images so that we cannot evaluate the specific IOL tilt. Long-term follow-up and prospective, interventional study are necessary to analyze the anatomic and functional recovery.

4. Conclusions

Our modified haptic-hook technique for intrascleral fixation of PC-IOLs without the use of scleral flaps might be useful for IOL implantation in eyes without sufficient capsule support. We believe that this technique is better than those previously reported because the number of the sclerotomy is less and the haptics are inserted back into the vitreous cavity. In addition, this operation is easy to carry out. Nevertheless, long-term anatomic and functional recovery in patients who have undergone surgery using this technique merit further study.
  12 in total

1.  Trocar-assisted sutureless intrascleral posterior chamber foldable intra-ocular lens fixation.

Authors:  Y Totan; R Karadag
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Sutureless intrascleral pocket technique of transscleral fixation of intraocular lens in previous vitrectomized eyes.

Authors:  Yong-Wun Cho; In-Young Chung; Ji-Myong Yoo; Seong-Jae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-14

3.  Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Brendan J Vote; Paris Tranos; Catey Bunce; David G Charteris; Lyndon Da Cruz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Fibrin glue-assisted sutureless posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in eyes with deficient posterior capsules.

Authors:  Amar Agarwal; Dhivya Ashok Kumar; Soosan Jacob; Chandresh Baid; Athiya Agarwal; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Simplified and safe method of sutureless intrascleral posterior chamber intraocular lens fixation: Y-fixation technique.

Authors:  Toshihiko Ohta; Hiroshi Toshida; Akira Murakami
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in pediatric and adult patients.

Authors:  Ayse Burcu; Zuleyha Yalniz-Akkaya; Iskan Abay; Mehmet Akif Acar; Firdevs Ornek
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 1.975

7.  Transconjunctival sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens fixation using intrascleral tunnels guided with catheter and 30-gauge needles.

Authors:  Kohei Takayama; Masayuki Akimoto; Hogara Taguchi; Satoko Nakagawa; Kano Hiroi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Remzi Karadag; Hüseyin Bayramlar; Ozgur Cakici
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Comparision of surgical outcomes of intraocular lens refixation and intraocular lens exchange with perfluorocarbon liquid and fibrin glue-assisted sutureless scleral fixation.

Authors:  S Y Oh; S J Lee; J M Park
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Visual outcomes of posterior chamber intraocular lens intrascleral fixation in the setting of postoperative and posttraumatic aphakia.

Authors:  Dariusz Haszcz; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Agnieszka Oleszczuk; Cesare Forlini; Matteo Forlini; Joanna Moneta-Wielgos; Ryszard Maciejewski; Katarzyna Michalska-Malecka; Anselm G Jünemann; Robert Rejdak
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  7 in total

1.  Flanged intraocular lens fixation via 27-gauge trocars using a double-needle technique decreases surgical wounds without losing its therapeutic effect.

Authors:  Hiroto Ishikawa; Hisashi Fukuyama; Yuki Komuku; Takashi Araki; Fumi Gomi
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Sutured Intrascleral Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Fixation with Ciliary Sulcus Location Guided by Ultrasonic Biological Microscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of Anatomical and Refractive Outcome.

Authors:  Ya Qu; Ping Duan; Shujia Huo; Fuliang Li; Jiawen Li
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Modified Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation Technique Using Two Vitrectomy Ports as Lens Haptic Fixation Sites.

Authors:  Yukihiko Suzuki; Toshio Tando; Kobu Adachi; Takashi Kudo; Mitsuru Nakazawa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-06

4.  Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas for eyes with insufficient capsular support.

Authors:  Zhouyue Li; Zhangkai Lian; Charlotte Aimee Young; Jing Zhao; Guangming Jin; Danying Zheng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

5.  Scleral tunnel with conjunctival autograft for rescue management of extruded haptic: Surgical technique and review of literature.

Authors:  Rinky Agarwal; Vishnu Todi; Rahul Kumar Bafna; Md Ibrahime Asif; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Effect of Intraocular Lens Tilt and Decentration on Visual Acuity, Dysphotopsia and Wavefront Aberrations.

Authors:  Zahra Ashena; Sundas Maqsood; Syed Naqib Ahmed; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14

7.  Rectangular loop suture to correct iris capture of the posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ke Lin; Zhixiang Hu; Zhong Lin; Tianyu Chen; Yongping Tang; Ronghan Wu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.