| Literature DB >> 30687338 |
Laura Brodde1, Kalev Adamson2, J Julio Camarero3, Carles Castaño4, Rein Drenkhan2, Asko Lehtijärvi5, Nicola Luchi6, Duccio Migliorini6, Ángela Sánchez-Miranda3, Jan Stenlid1, Şule Özdağ5,7, Jonàs Oliva1,8.
Abstract
Disease emergence in northern and boreal forests has been mostly due to tree-pathogen encounters lacking a co-evolutionary past. However, outbreaks involving novel interactions of the host or the pathogen with the environment have been less well documented. Following an increase of records in Northern Europe, the first large outbreak of Diplodia sapinea on Pinus sylvestris was discovered in Sweden in 2016. By reconstructing the development of the epidemic, we found that the attacks started approx. 10 years back from several isolated trees in the stand and ended up affecting almost 90% of the trees in 2016. Limited damage was observed in other plantations in the surroundings of the affected stand, pointing to a new introduced pathogen as the cause of the outbreak. Nevertheless, no genetic differences based on SSR markers were found between isolates of the outbreak area and other Swedish isolates predating the outbreak or from other populations in Europe and Asia Minor. On a temporal scale, we saw that warm May and June temperatures were associated with higher damage and low tree growth, while cold and rainy conditions seemed to favor growth and deter disease. At a spatial scale, we saw that spread occurred predominantly in the SW aspect-area of the stand. Within that area and based on tree-ring and isotope (δ13C) analyses, we saw that disease occurred on trees that over the years had shown a lower water-use efficiency (WUE). Spore traps showed that highly infected trees were those producing the largest amount of inoculum. D. sapinea impaired latewood growth and reduced C reserves in needles and branches. D. sapinea attacks can cause serious economic damage by killing new shoots, disrupting the crown, and affecting the quality of stems. Our results show that D. sapinea has no limitations in becoming a serious pathogen in Northern Europe. Management should focus on reducing inoculum, especially since climate change may bring more favorable conditions for this pathogen. Seedlings for planting should be carefully inspected as D. sapinea may be present in a latent stage in asymptomatic tissues.Entities:
Keywords: carbon isotopes; dendroecology; earlywood; latewood; vascular wilt pathogen; water-use efficiency
Year: 2019 PMID: 30687338 PMCID: PMC6334237 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Location of 40 trees used for isolation and spore trapping (white), 31 plots used for damage assessment and dendrochronology (yellow), and location of the four plots where the 24 trees used for physiological measurements were located within the affected stand (red). Image on the left modified from NordNordWest - own work, using World Data Base II data, CC BY-SA 3.0. Image on the right modified from Google Earth Image © 2017 CNES/Airbus.
Population structure among Diplodia sapinea isolates from five different locations in Sweden collected in 2013 and from the location of the outbreak, and genetic distance among Sweden’s D. sapinea population and other four populations in Europe.
| Population |
| MLG | eMLG | Simpson’s index corrected | Jost’s D genetic distance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arlanda, 2016 | 40 | 4 | 2.62 | 0.387 | |||||
| Fjällnora, 2013 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0.286 | −0.05 | ||||
| Gothenburg, 2013 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0.223 | 0.00 | ||||
| Gula Stigen, 2013 | 31 | 2 | 1.93 | 0.322 | 0.02 | −0.01 | −0.04 | ||
| Lomma, 2013 | 20 | 3 | 2.98 | 0.679 | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.00 | −0.02 | |
| Visby, 2013 | 25 | 4 | 2.99 | 0.510 | 0.02 | −0.01 | -0.03 | −0.02 | |
| Sweden | 132 | 6 | 3.19 | 0.620 | |||||
| Estonia | 11 | 5 | 5.00 | 0.782 | |||||
| Spain | 23 | 6 | 5.01 | 0.810 | 0.01 | ||||
| Turkey | 16 | 12 | 9.17 | 0.966 | |||||
| Italy | 15 | 4 | 3.47 | 0.657 | 0.02 | ||||
Data based on 10 SSR loci. The number of isolates (n), multilocus genotypes (MLG), multilocus genotypes rarefied to 10 isolates (eMLG), and Simpson index corrected for different sample size are shown. Jost’s D genetic distance calculated without clone correction. Jost’s D-values significantly different from 0 are shown in boldface.
Figure 2Minimum spanning network among D. sapinea haplotypes in Europe (A). Haplotypes from the outbreak area are marked with an (*). Pie charts with relative proportion of haplotypes among populations (B). Underlined haplotypes are found in more than one location.
Figure 3Spatial and temporal spread of D. sapinea within the affected Scots pine stand (A) and association between severity in 2016 and location (n = 31 stands) (B). SW-NE was calculated as the product of the relative X and Y coordinates of the sampling plots; higher values indicate NE locations, while low values indicate SW locations. Both severity and SW-NE location are plotted following square-root transformation.
Figure 4Temporal association between tree growth, D. sapinea epidemic, and weather conditions. (A) Tree radial growth based on basal area increments (BAI) and development of D. sapinea in the stand from 2007 to 2016 (n = 264 trees) (B), correlation between standardized residuals from D. sapinea increments and BAI of 264 trees over 9 years (C), correlation between average monthly temperatures (D) and precipitation (E) from 2007 to 2016 (n = 9 years) and standardized residuals from D. sapinea increments and BAI from 264 trees. Dashed lines in a, b, and c show adjusted linear regression. Significance levels in bar plots: **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Figure 5Comparative physiological performance between trees defoliated by D. sapinea (n = 12 trees) and non-defoliated trees (n = 12 trees). Latewood (A) and earlywood (B) widths in the period 2007–2016. (C) Carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) comparison between defoliated and non-defoliated trees across years when tree growth was high and spring conditions were cold (2012 to 2014) and years when spring was warm and growth was low (2013 and 2016). (D) Soluble sugar (SS) and starch concentration (% of dry weight) differences between defoliated and non-defoliated trees in needles and branch sapwood. Significant levels: **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
Figure 6Weekly spore captures depending on the rain conditions, tree exposure, and percentage of infected shoots. Spores were trapped under each tree (n = 40 trees/traps during dry period, and n = 39 during wet period). Tree exposure ranges from 0 to 4 and measures how exposed to rain and wind was the crown of the tree: 0, tree surrounded by other trees; 4, tree growing in open space. No spore trap was placed under a tree with less than 10% defoliation or with a lower exposure than 1.