Literature DB >> 30686511

Clinical outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty-allograft composite for revision of failed arthroplasty associated with proximal humeral bone deficiency: 2- to 15-year follow-up.

Jacob L Cox1, Paul B McLendon2, Kaitlyn N Christmas3, Peter Simon4, Mark A Mighell2, Mark A Frankle5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with pain and disability due to a prior failed shoulder arthroplasty with associated proximal humeral bone loss have limited reconstruction options. Our purpose was to report the results of a large cohort of patients treated with a reverse shoulder allograft-prosthetic composite (APC).
METHODS: Between 2002 and 2012, a total of 73 patients were treated with a reverse shoulder APC and had adequate follow-up. Clinical outcome scores, range of motion, and radiographic evidence of failure were assessed. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years, with an average of 67.9 months (range, 21-157 months). Of the patients, 43 had more than 5 years' follow-up and 12 had more than 10 years' follow-up.
RESULTS: The total American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 33.8 to 51.4 (P < .0001), and the Simple Shoulder Test score improved from 1.3 to 3.5 (P < .0001). Good to excellent results were reported in 42 of 60 patients (70%), 10 patients (17%) reported satisfactory results, and 8 patients (13%) were unsatisfied. Range of motion improved in forward flexion (49° to 75°, P < .001) and abduction (45° to 72°, P < .001). Revision was required in 14 patients (19%) for periprosthetic fracture (n = 6), instability (n = 2), glenosphere dissociation (n = 2), humeral loosening (n = 2), and infection (n = 2) at a mean of 38 months postoperatively. The reoperation-free survival rate of all reconstructions was 88% (30 of 34) at 5 years, 78% (21 of 27) at 10 years, and 67% (8 of 12) beyond 10 years. Ten patients had radiographic evidence of humeral loosening at final follow-up, and 2 required revision.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a reverse total shoulder APC provides reliable pain relief and improved range of motion, with an acceptable rate of complications. Although ultimate function achieved is limited, patient satisfaction remains high.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APC; RSA; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; allograft; proximal humeral bone loss; revision

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30686511     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Failed Operative Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Zinon T Kokkalis; Aikaterini Bavelou; Efstratios Papanikos; Dimitrios Kalavrytinos; Andreas Panagopoulos
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-03-29

2.  The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Maciej Zrodowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 4.  Mechanical complications and fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: part I.

Authors:  Marko Nabergoj; Patrick J Denard; Philippe Collin; Rihard Trebše; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

5.  Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Dolci; Barbara Melis; Marco Verona; Antonio Capone; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-08

6.  Effect of complications on outcomes after revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Erin Granger; Kortnie Broschinsky; Jun Kawakami; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.