Daniela C Fuhr1, Benedict Weobong2, Anisha Lazarus3, Fiona Vanobberghen4, Helen A Weiss4, Daisy Radha Singla5, Hanani Tabana6, Ejma Afonso3, Aveena De Sa3, Ethel D'Souza3, Akankasha Joshi3, Priya Korgaonkar3, Revathi Krishna3, LeShawndra N Price7, Atif Rahman8, Vikram Patel9. 1. Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2. Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana; Sangath Centre, Socorro, Bardez, Goa, India. 3. Sangath Centre, Socorro, Bardez, Goa, India. 4. Medical Research Council Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa. 7. National Institute of Mental Health and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 8. Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 9. Sangath Centre, Socorro, Bardez, Goa, India; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: vikram_patel@hms.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) is a psychological intervention recommended for the treatment of perinatal depression. However, efforts to integrate the intervention at scale into the routines of community health workers who delivered the THP when it was first evaluated were compromised by the competing responsibilities of community health workers. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of THP peer-delivered (THPP) in Goa, India. METHODS: In this single-blind, individually randomised controlled trial, we recruited pregnant women aged 18 years or older who scored at least 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from antenatal clinics in Goa. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive enhanced usual care (EUC; so-called because, in India, perinatal depression is not typically treated) only (control group) or THPP in addition to EUC (intervention group) in randomly sized blocks that were stratified by area of residence (urban or rural). Group allocations were concealed from participants and researchers before assignments were made by use of sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. The primary outcomes were the severity of depressive symptoms (assessed by PHQ-9 score) and the prevalence of remission (defined as a PHQ-9 score of less than 5) in participants with available data 6 months after childbirth, which was assessed by researchers who were masked to treatment allocations. We analysed outcomes by intention to treat, adjusting for covariates that were defined a priori or that showed imbalance at baseline. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02104232. FINDINGS: Between Oct 24, 2014, and June 24, 2016, we assessed 118 260 women for their eligibility for screening, of whom 111 851 (94·6%) women were ineligible. 6409 (5·4%) women were eligible for screening and 6369 (99·4%) of these women consented to be screened with the PHQ-9 (40 women did not consent), of whom 333 (5·2%) screened positive for depression (defined as a PHQ-9 score of at least 10). We enrolled 280 (84·1%) women with perinatal depression; 140 women were assigned to the THPP and EUCgroup and 140 women to the EUC only group. The final treatment was given on May 27, 2017. The final 6-month outcome assessment was completed on June 9, 2017. At 6 months after birth, 122 (87%) women in the THPP and EUC group and 129 (92%) women in the EUC only group were assessed for the primary outcome. There was a higher prevalence of remission at 6 months after birth in the THPP and EUC group compared with the EUC only group (89 [73%] women in the intervention group vs 77 [60%] women in the control group; prevalence ratio 1·21, 95% CI 1·01 to 1·45; p=0·04), but there was no evidence of a difference in symptom severity between the groups (mean PHQ-9 score 3·47 [SD 4·49] in the intervention group vs 4·48 [5·11] in the control group; standardised mean difference -0·18, 95% CI -0·43 to 0·07; p=0·16). There was no evidence of significant differences in serious adverse events between the groups. INTERPRETATION:THPP had a moderate effect on remission from perinatal depression over the 6-month postnatal period. THPP is relatively cheap to deliver and is cost-saving through reduced health-care, time and productivity costs. FUNDING: National Institute of Mental Health (USA).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) is a psychological intervention recommended for the treatment of perinatal depression. However, efforts to integrate the intervention at scale into the routines of community health workers who delivered the THP when it was first evaluated were compromised by the competing responsibilities of community health workers. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of THP peer-delivered (THPP) in Goa, India. METHODS: In this single-blind, individually randomised controlled trial, we recruited pregnant women aged 18 years or older who scored at least 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from antenatal clinics in Goa. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive enhanced usual care (EUC; so-called because, in India, perinatal depression is not typically treated) only (control group) or THPP in addition to EUC (intervention group) in randomly sized blocks that were stratified by area of residence (urban or rural). Group allocations were concealed from participants and researchers before assignments were made by use of sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. The primary outcomes were the severity of depressive symptoms (assessed by PHQ-9 score) and the prevalence of remission (defined as a PHQ-9 score of less than 5) in participants with available data 6 months after childbirth, which was assessed by researchers who were masked to treatment allocations. We analysed outcomes by intention to treat, adjusting for covariates that were defined a priori or that showed imbalance at baseline. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02104232. FINDINGS: Between Oct 24, 2014, and June 24, 2016, we assessed 118 260 women for their eligibility for screening, of whom 111 851 (94·6%) women were ineligible. 6409 (5·4%) women were eligible for screening and 6369 (99·4%) of these women consented to be screened with the PHQ-9 (40 women did not consent), of whom 333 (5·2%) screened positive for depression (defined as a PHQ-9 score of at least 10). We enrolled 280 (84·1%) women with perinatal depression; 140 women were assigned to the THPP and EUC group and 140 women to the EUC only group. The final treatment was given on May 27, 2017. The final 6-month outcome assessment was completed on June 9, 2017. At 6 months after birth, 122 (87%) women in the THPP and EUC group and 129 (92%) women in the EUC only group were assessed for the primary outcome. There was a higher prevalence of remission at 6 months after birth in the THPP and EUC group compared with the EUC only group (89 [73%] women in the intervention group vs 77 [60%] women in the control group; prevalence ratio 1·21, 95% CI 1·01 to 1·45; p=0·04), but there was no evidence of a difference in symptom severity between the groups (mean PHQ-9 score 3·47 [SD 4·49] in the intervention group vs 4·48 [5·11] in the control group; standardised mean difference -0·18, 95% CI -0·43 to 0·07; p=0·16). There was no evidence of significant differences in serious adverse events between the groups. INTERPRETATION:THPP had a moderate effect on remission from perinatal depression over the 6-month postnatal period. THPP is relatively cheap to deliver and is cost-saving through reduced health-care, time and productivity costs. FUNDING: National Institute of Mental Health (USA).
Authors: S Darius Tandon; Jessica K Johnson; Alicia Diebold; Melissa Segovia; Jackie K Gollan; Aria Degillio; Dana Zakieh; Chen Yeh; Jesus Solano-Martinez; Jody D Ciolino Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Joanna Maselko; Siham Sikander; Elizabeth L Turner; Lisa M Bates; Ikhlaq Ahmad; Najia Atif; Victoria Baranov; Sonia Bhalotra; Amina Bibi; Tayyaba Bibi; Samina Bilal; Pietro Biroli; Esther Chung; John A Gallis; Ashley Hagaman; Anam Jamil; Katherine LeMasters; Karen O'Donnell; Elissa Scherer; Maria Sharif; Ahmed Waqas; Ahmed Zaidi; Shaffaq Zulfiqar; Atif Rahman Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: PhuongThao D Le; Martín Agrest; Lawrence H Yang; Rubén Alvarado; Ezra S Susser; Franco Mascayano; Saloni Dev; Tanvi Kankan; Gabriella Dishy; Thamara Tapia-Muñoz; Eric Tapia; Josefina Toso-Salman; Charissa Pratt; Silvia Alves-Nishioka; Sara Schilling; María José Jorquera; Joaquín Castro-Valdez; Norma Geffner; LeShawndra N Price; Sarah Conover; Eliecer Valencia Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2021-03-01