Literature DB >> 30686326

Robot-Assisted Reach Training With an Active Assistant Protocol for Long-Term Upper Extremity Impairment Poststroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ki Hun Cho1, Won-Kyung Song2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether robot-assisted reach training (RART) with an active assistant protocol can improve upper extremity function and kinematic performance in chronic stroke survivors.
DESIGN: This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: National rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Chronic stroke survivors (N=38) were randomized into 2 groups: a robot-assisted reach training with assist-as-needed (RT-AAN) group and a robot-assisted reach training with guidance force (RT-G) group. INTERVENTION: The RT-AAN group received robot-assisted reach training with an assist-as-needed mode for 40 minutes per day, 3 times per week over a 6-week period, and the RT-G group participated in the RART with a guidance mode for 40 minutes per day, 3 times per week over a 6-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Upper extremity functions were measured with Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Box and Block Test. In addition, movement velocities were measured as an index for upper extremity kinematic performances in 6 directions.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvements in FMA, ARAT, and kinematics (movement velocity) in all directions (targets 1-6, P<.05). However, the RT-AAN group showed significantly more improvement than the RT-G group in FMA and ARAT (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: RART with an active assistant protocol showed improvements of upper extremity function and kinematic performance in chronic stroke survivors. In particular, assist-as-needed robot control was effective for upper extremity rehabilitation. Therefore robot-assisted training may be suggested as an effective intervention to improve upper extremity function in chronic stroke survivors.
Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30686326     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  3 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Limb Rehabilitation Therapy After Post-stroke Motor Recovery.

Authors:  Fei Xiong; Xin Liao; Jie Xiao; Xin Bai; Jiaqi Huang; Bi Zhang; Fang Li; Pengfei Li
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  Feasibility and Potential Effects of Robot-Assisted Passive Range of Motion Training in Combination with Conventional Rehabilitation on Hand Function in Patients with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Chia-Yu Hsu; Chu-Ming Wu; Chieh-Cheng Huang; Hung-Hai Shie; Yuh-Show Tsai
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Doumas; Gauthier Everard; Stéphanie Dehem; Thierry Lejeune
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.