Literature DB >> 30685369

Full Endoscopic Key Hole Technique for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis: Is Mere Dorsal Decompression Enough?

Chuan Guo1, Lifeng Zhang1, Qingquan Kong2, Yu Wang1, Jin Yang1, Yuqing Yan1, Hao Wu1, Zhiyu Peng1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether and when mere dorsal decompression is enough in the full endoscopic key hole technique for foraminal stenosis.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 22 patients with cervical foraminal stenosis who underwent full endoscopic key hole mere dorsal decompression in our institute from October 2016 to October 2017.
RESULTS: Preoperative neck disability index, neck visual analog scale score, and arm visual analog scale score were 25.8 ± 0.8, 4.9 ± 0.6, and 7.5 ± 0.5 in the group. Immediate postoperative scores were 6.9 ± 0.9, 1.3 ± 0.9, and 1.4 ± 0.5. Follow-up scores at 3 months (7.0 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.6, and 2.7 ± 0.9), 6 months (7.3 ± 0.9, 2.1 ± 0.9, and 1.9 ± 0.5), and 12 months (7.6 ± 0.5, 2.5 ± 0.8, and 2.1 ± 0.7). The symptoms had improved significantly (P < 0.05). According to the Macnab criteria, 15 patients reported excellent results, 2 reported good results, and 2 reported fair results at the 12-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Stenosis is mainly caused by dorsal structures; mere dorsal decompression is enough. In both cases, the ventral and dorsal structures contributed to the stenosis. When there is no herniated soft fragment contributing to the stenosis, ventral decompression is not always necessary. If intraoperative exploration detects less tension formed by the ventral abnormal structures, mere dorsal decompression is enough to settle the symptoms.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical stenosis; Decompression; Dorsal; Full endoscopic; Key hole; Ventral

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30685369     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Tong Yu; Jiu-Ping Wu; Jun Zhang; Hai-Chi Yu; Qin-Yi Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Outcome of Anterior and Posterior Endoscopic Procedures for Cervical Radiculopathy Due to Degenerative Disk Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Soha A Alomar; Yazid Maghrabi; Saleh S Baeesa; Óscar L Alves
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-08-17

3.  A comparison study of posterior cervical percutaneous endoscopic ventral bony decompression and simple dorsal decompression treatment in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy caused by cervical foraminal and/or lateral spinal stenosis: a clinical retrospective study.

Authors:  Yuexin Tong; Zhangheng Huang; Chuan Hu; Zhiyi Fan; Fucheng Bian; Fengkai Yang; Chengliang Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Is the Severity of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis Related to the Severity and Sidedness of Symptoms?

Authors:  Han-Dong Lee; Chang-Hoon Jeon; Nam-Su Chung; Ha-Seung Yoon; Hee-Woong Chung
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.