Literature DB >> 30685327

Determining the optimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer: An analysis using the nodal staging score model.

Jie Hua1, Bo Zhang1, Jin Xu1, Jiang Liu1, Quanxing Ni1, Jin He2, Lei Zheng3, Xianjun Yu4, Si Shi5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer using the nodal staging score model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological data for patients with resected pancreatic cancer were collected from SEER database (development cohort [DC]) and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center database (validation cohort [VC]). Multivariable models were constructed to assess how the number of ELNs was associated with stage migration and overall survival (OS). Using the β-binomial distribution, we developed a nodal staging score model from the DC and tested it with the VC.
RESULTS: Both cohorts exhibited significant proportional increases from node-negative to node-positive disease (DC: odds ratio [OR], 1.047; P < 0.001; VC: OR, 1.035; P < 0.001) and improved OS (DC: hazard ratio [HR], 0.982; P < 0.001; VC: HR, 0.979; P < 0.001) as ELNs increased. Nodal staging scores escalated separately as ELNs increased for different tumor (T) stages, with plateaus at 16, 21, and 23 LNs (cut-offs) for T1, T2, and T3 tumors, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that examining more LNs than the corresponding cut-off value was a significant survival predictor (DC: HR, 0.813; P < 0.001; VC: HR, 0.696; P = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: The optimal number of ELNs for adequate staging of pancreatic cancer was related to T stage. We recommend examining at least 16, 21, and 23 LNs for T1, T2, and T3 tumors, respectively, as a nodal staging quality measure for both surgery and pathological analysis.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Examined lymph nodes; Nodal staging score; Pancreatic cancer; Stage migration; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30685327     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  6 in total

1.  Stage migration resulting from inadequate number of examined lymph nodes impacts prognosis in stage II colon cancer after radical surgery.

Authors:  Di Xie; Xiangping Song; Lingling Tong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yuan Zeng; Nicholas Mayne; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Jun Liu; Fei Cui; Jingpei Li; Wenhua Liang; Jianxing He
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04

3.  The influence of cervical lymph node number of neck dissection on the prognosis of the early oral cancer patients.

Authors:  Chieh-Yuan Cheng; Fang-Ju Sun; Chung-Ji Liu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yangyang Zheng; Zhenhua Lu; Xiaolei Shi; Tianhua Tan; Cheng Xing; Jingyong Xu; Hongyuan Cui; Jinghai Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a study based on the SEER database and a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Liang Zhou; Yahui Zhang; Wenyu Chen; Niu Niu; Junjie Zhao; Weibo Qi; Yufen Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.

Authors:  Zhen-Jiang Zheng; Mo-Jin Wang; Chun-Lu Tan; Yong-Hua Chen; Jie Ping; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.