Literature DB >> 30685209

The Toxin-Antidote Model of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: Genetics and Evolutionary Implications.

John F Beckmann1, Manon Bonneau2, Hongli Chen3, Mark Hochstrasser3, Denis Poinsot4, Hervé Merçot5, Mylène Weill6, Mathieu Sicard7, Sylvain Charlat8.   

Abstract

Wolbachia bacteria inhabit the cells of about half of all arthropod species, an unparalleled success stemming in large part from selfish invasive strategies. Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), whereby the symbiont makes itself essential to embryo viability, is the most common of these and constitutes a promising weapon against vector-borne diseases. After decades of theoretical and experimental struggle, major recent advances have been made toward a molecular understanding of this phenomenon. As pieces of the puzzle come together, from yeast and Drosophila fly transgenesis to CI diversity patterns in natural mosquito populations, it becomes clearer than ever that the CI induction and rescue stem from a toxin-antidote (TA) system. Further, the tight association of the CI genes with prophages provides clues to the possible evolutionary origin of this phenomenon and the levels of selection at play.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wolbachia; cytoplasmic incompatibility; deubiquitylase; nuclease; selfish genetic elements; toxin–antidote systems

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30685209      PMCID: PMC6519454          DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  75 in total

1.  The evolution of cytoplasmic incompatibility or when spite can be successful.

Authors:  L D Hurst
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1991-01-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  What traits are carried on mobile genetic elements, and why?

Authors:  D J Rankin; E P C Rocha; S P Brown
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  Fruit flies and the sperm proteome.

Authors:  Timothy L Karr
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  The incidence of bacterial endosymbionts in terrestrial arthropods.

Authors:  Lucy A Weinert; Eli V Araujo-Jnr; Muhammad Z Ahmed; John J Welch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Does pupal communication influence Wolbachia-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility?

Authors:  Angelo Jacquet; Béatrice Horard; Benjamin Loppin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Prophage WO genes recapitulate and enhance Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Authors:  Daniel P LePage; Jason A Metcalf; Sarah R Bordenstein; Jungmin On; Jessamyn I Perlmutter; J Dylan Shropshire; Emily M Layton; Lisa J Funkhouser-Jones; John F Beckmann; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The potential role of Wolbachia in controlling the transmission of emerging human arboviral infections.

Authors:  Joseph Kamtchum-Tatuene; Benjamin L Makepeace; Laura Benjamin; Matthew Baylis; Tom Solomon
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.915

8.  One prophage WO gene rescues cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Dylan Shropshire; Jungmin On; Emily M Layton; Helen Zhou; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems: more than selfish entities?

Authors:  Laurence Van Melderen; Manuel Saavedra De Bast
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  To be or not to be: regulation of restriction-modification systems and other toxin-antitoxin systems.

Authors:  Iwona Mruk; Ichizo Kobayashi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  35 in total

1.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A Wolbachia nuclease and its binding partner provide a distinct mechanism for cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Authors:  Hongli Chen; Judith A Ronau; John F Beckmann; Mark Hochstrasser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Loss of cytoplasmic incompatibility and minimal fecundity effects explain relatively low Wolbachia frequencies in Drosophila mauritiana.

Authors:  Megan K Meany; William R Conner; Sophia V Richter; Jessica A Bailey; Michael Turelli; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Structural and mechanistic insights into the complexes formed by Wolbachia cytoplasmic incompatibility factors.

Authors:  Yunjie Xiao; Hongli Chen; Haofeng Wang; Mengwen Zhang; Xia Chen; Jason M Berk; Lilin Zhang; Yi Wei; Wenling Li; Wen Cui; Fenghua Wang; Qianfan Wang; Can Cui; Ting Li; Cheng Chen; Sheng Ye; Lei Zhang; Xiaoyun Ji; Jinhai Huang; Wei Wang; Zefang Wang; Mark Hochstrasser; Haitao Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A single mutation weakens symbiont-induced reproductive manipulation through reductions in deubiquitylation efficiency.

Authors:  John F Beckmann; Kelley Van Vaerenberghe; Daniel E Akwa; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Wolbachia Endosymbiont of the Horn Fly (Haematobia irritans irritans): a Supergroup A Strain with Multiple Horizontally Acquired Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Genes.

Authors:  Mukund Madhav; Rhys Parry; Jess A T Morgan; Peter James; Sassan Asgari
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Caution Does Not Preclude Predictive and Testable Models of Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: A Reply to Shropshire et al.

Authors:  John F Beckmann; Manon Bonneau; Hongli Chen; Mark Hochstrasser; Denis Poinsot; Hervé Merçot; Mylène Weill; Mathieu Sicard; Sylvain Charlat
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 8.  Revisiting the rules of life for viruses of microorganisms.

Authors:  Adrienne M S Correa; Cristina Howard-Varona; Samantha R Coy; Alison Buchan; Matthew B Sullivan; Joshua S Weitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  Comparative Genomics Reveals Factors Associated with Phenotypic Expression of Wolbachia.

Authors:  Guilherme Costa Baião; Jessin Janice; Maria Galinou; Lisa Klasson
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  The impacts of cytoplasmic incompatibility factor (cifA and cifB) genetic variation on phenotypes.

Authors:  J Dylan Shropshire; Rachel Rosenberg; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.