Literature DB >> 30685191

Cancer information-seeking preferences linked to distinct patient experiences and differential satisfaction with cancer care.

Carmen G Loiselle1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: True person-centered care (PCC) involves anticipating, responding to, and integrating patients' needs and preferences as the illness experience unfolds. PCC success rests, in part, on quality provider-patient communication and tailored information exchange. These processes can have profound effects on the patient experience, self-management and health outcomes including survival. Cancer information-seeking preferences (CISP) by patients are increasingly found to modulate illness and care processes. However, research has yet to document the CISP types and prevalence as well as their associations with satisfaction with care.
METHOD: Individuals (N = 2142) treated for cancer in the last 6 months completed the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) and a CISP measure.
RESULTS: Whereas 60.3% (n = 1292) reported wanting to actively seek information about their cancer, a surprisingly high percentage (i.e., 39.7%; n = 850) did not. Men reported avoiding cancer information to a greater extent than women, χ² (4, N = 2108) = 12.00, p =  0.02. CISP were also differentially associated with 6 key domains of satisfaction, with intense seekers consistently being less satisfied. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings underscore how CISP can significantly affect patients' cancer experience as well as their care satisfaction.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer information-seeking preferences; Information avoidance; Patient needs; Patients as partners; Person-centered care; Personalized cancer care; Satisfaction with cancer care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30685191     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  6 in total

1.  Patients' cancer care perceptions conceptualized through the Cancer Experience Measurement Framework.

Authors:  Michaela A Bourque; Carmen G Loiselle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  The Knowledge and Attitude of Patients Diagnosed with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer towards Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Wonkyo Shin; Gowoon Jeong; Yedong Son; Sang-Soo Seo; Sokbom Kang; Sang-Yoon Park; Myong Cheol Lim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.

Authors:  Saleh A Alessy; Mohammed Alhajji; Janette Rawlinson; Matthew Baker; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

4.  What Causes Health Information Avoidance Behavior under Normalized COVID-19 Pandemic? A Research from Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Qingxiu Ding; Yadi Gu; Gongrang Zhang; Xingguo Li; Qin Zhao; Dongxiao Gu; Xuejie Yang; Xiaoyu Wang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Fatalistic Cancer Beliefs Across Generations and Geographic Classifications: Examining the Role of Health Information Seeking Challenges and Confidence.

Authors:  Samantha R Paige; Jordan M Alpert; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Maladaptive coping with the infodemic and sleep disturbance in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Cecilia Cheng; Omid V Ebrahimi; Yan-Ching Lau
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.296

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.