Literature DB >> 30684819

Improving health providers smoking cessation care in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yael Bar-Zeev1, Billie Bonevski2, Ling Li Lim3, Laura Twyman3, Eliza Skelton3, Maree Gruppetta4, Kerrin Palazzi5, Christopher Oldmeadow5, Gillian S Gould2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health providers are lacking in their provision of smoking cessation care during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to systematically review all available global studies on the effectiveness of interventions in improving health providers' provision of smoking cessation care during pregnancy.
METHODS: Five databases were searched, Inclusion criteria included all intervention study types. Two reviewers screened abstracts and full texts independently. Interventions were characterized according to the Effective Practice Of Care taxonomy. Random-effects meta-analyses examined intervention effects on smoking cessation care components based on the 5As. Estimates were number of participants reporting each outcome, or mean score, transformed into Cohen's d. Crude meta-regressions, and meta-analysis subgrouping, were performed to examine whether intervention effects for 'Ask', 'Advise' and 'Assist' differed by intervention components.
RESULTS: Of 3165 manuscripts, 16 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed significant small to large intervention effects on the different care components (Cohen's d ranging from 0.47 for 'Ask' (95%CI 0.13-0.81) to 1.12 (95%CI 0.45-1.79) for 'Setting a quit date'). Crude meta-regression suggested that for 'Ask', having a theoretical basis may improve effectiveness (Cohen's d difference 0.62, 95% CI 0.12-1.1). Subgrouping the meta-analysis suggested that audit and feedback possibly increases intervention effectiveness for 'Advise' and 'Assist'.
CONCLUSION: Interventions designed to improve provision of smoking cessation care during pregnancy show a small increase in care components. Studies vary substantially in design, intervention components, and outcome measurement, impacting ability to synthesize available data. Audit and feedback and enhancing intervention design by using behaviour change theories may improve effectiveness. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016030143.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health providers; Pregnancy; Smoking cessation; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30684819     DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  4 in total

1.  Improving smoking cessation care in pregnancy at Aboriginal Medical Services: 'ICAN QUIT in Pregnancy' step-wedge cluster randomised study.

Authors:  Yael Bar-Zeev; Michelle Bovill; Billie Bonevski; Maree Gruppetta; Christopher Oldmeadow; Kerrin Palazzi; Louise Atkins; Jennifer Reath; Gillian Sandra Gould
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Implementation and Outcomes of a Maternal Smoking Cessation Program for a Multi-ethnic Cohort in California, USA, 2012-2019.

Authors:  Anne Berit Petersen; Temidayo Ogunrinu; Shane Wallace; Jane Yun; Juan Carlos Belliard; Pramil N Singh
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-11-05

3.  Gestational Women's Perceptions About the Harms of Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Page D Dobbs; Yu Lu; Sarah Maness; Lois Coleman; Aleyah Johnson; Samantha Metz; Charlie Vidal; Marshall K Cheney
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-15

4.  Implementation strategies to improve preconception and antenatal care for tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and weight management: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Emma Doherty; Melanie Kingsland; Luke Wolfenden; John Wiggers; Julia Dray; Jenna Hollis; Elizabeth J Elliott; Justine B Daly; Kylie A Bailey; John Attia; Mandy Hunter; Ian Symonds; Belinda Tully; Danika Tremain; Rebecca K Hodder
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.