MAIN CONCLUSION: Illumina-Miseq®-based cyanobiont diversity and biomass were analyzed in six Azolla spp. Results revealed that 93-98% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belong to Nostacaceae followed by Cylindrospermopsis with about 1-6% OTUs. The taxonomy of Azolla-cyanobiont is a long-term debate within the scientific community. Morphological and biochemical-based reports indicated the presence of Anabaena, Nostoc and/or Trichormus azollae as abundant Azolla-cyanobionts, however, molecular data did not support the abundance of Anabaena and/or Nostoc. To understand furthermore, the cyanobiont diversity in six species of Azolla (A. microphylla, A. mexicana, A. filiculoides, A. caroliniana, A. pinnata and A. rubra) was analyzed based on 16S rRNA Illumina-MiSeq sequencing. Additionally, biomass and nutrient profiling of Azolla spp. were analyzed and correlated with cyanobiont diversity. Illumina-MiSeq data revealed that 99.6-99.9% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonged to Nostocophycideae (class), Nostocales (order) and Nostacaceae (family). At genus level, the unassigned affiliation (93.4-97.9%) under Nostacaceae family was abundant followed by Cylindrospermopsis OTUs (1.1-6.0%). Interestingly, A. pinnata harboured maximum Cylindrospermopsis OTUs and also recorded higher biomass (40.67 g m-2 day-1), whereas crude protein (25.9%) and antioxidants (76.9%) were recorded to be higher in A. microphylla. Biplot analysis revealed that A. pinnata and its cyanobiont abundance were positively correlated with neutral and acid detergent fibers. Overall, the present findings deepened the understanding about cyanobiont in Azolla and its relations with Azolla nutrient profiling.
MAIN CONCLUSION: Illumina-Miseq®-based cyanobiont diversity and biomass were analyzed in six Azolla spp. Results revealed that 93-98% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belong to Nostacaceae followed by Cylindrospermopsis with about 1-6% OTUs. The taxonomy of Azolla-cyanobiont is a long-term debate within the scientific community. Morphological and biochemical-based reports indicated the presence of Anabaena, Nostoc and/or Trichormus azollae as abundant Azolla-cyanobionts, however, molecular data did not support the abundance of Anabaena and/or Nostoc. To understand furthermore, the cyanobiont diversity in six species of Azolla (A. microphylla, A. mexicana, A. filiculoides, A. caroliniana, A. pinnata and A. rubra) was analyzed based on 16S rRNA Illumina-MiSeq sequencing. Additionally, biomass and nutrient profiling of Azolla spp. were analyzed and correlated with cyanobiont diversity. Illumina-MiSeq data revealed that 99.6-99.9% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonged to Nostocophycideae (class), Nostocales (order) and Nostacaceae (family). At genus level, the unassigned affiliation (93.4-97.9%) under Nostacaceae family was abundant followed by Cylindrospermopsis OTUs (1.1-6.0%). Interestingly, A. pinnata harboured maximum Cylindrospermopsis OTUs and also recorded higher biomass (40.67 g m-2 day-1), whereas crude protein (25.9%) and antioxidants (76.9%) were recorded to be higher in A. microphylla. Biplot analysis revealed that A. pinnata and its cyanobiont abundance were positively correlated with neutral and acid detergent fibers. Overall, the present findings deepened the understanding about cyanobiont in Azolla and its relations with Azolla nutrient profiling.
Authors: Laura W Dijkhuizen; Paul Brouwer; Henk Bolhuis; Gert-Jan Reichart; Nils Koppers; Bruno Huettel; Anthony M Bolger; Fay-Wei Li; Shifeng Cheng; Xin Liu; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Kathleen Pryer; Andreas Weber; Andrea Bräutigam; Henriette Schluepmann Journal: New Phytol Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Lance B Price; Cindy M Liu; Kristine E Johnson; Maliha Aziz; Matthew K Lau; Jolene Bowers; Jacques Ravel; Paul S Keim; David Serwadda; Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Federico Brilli; K G Srikanta Dani; Stefania Pasqualini; Alma Costarelli; Sara Cannavò; Francesco Paolocci; Graziella Chini Zittelli; Gianmarco Mugnai; Rita Baraldi; Francesco Loreto Journal: Physiol Plant Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 5.081