Ahmed Haider1, Adrienne Müller Herde1, Stefanie D Krämer1, Jasmine Varisco1, Claudia Keller1, Katrin Frauenknecht2, Yves P Auberson3, Louisa Temme4, Dina Robaa5, Wolfgang Sippl5, Roger Schibli1,6, Bernhard Wünsch4, Linjing Mu1,6, Simon M Ametamey7. 1. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Institute of Neuropathology, University of Zurich/University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Institute of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. 5. Institute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany; and. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 7. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland simon.ametamey@pharma.ethz.ch.
Abstract
The study aims to investigate the performance characteristics of the enantiomers of 11C-Me-NB1, a recently reported PET imaging probe that targets the GluN2B subunit of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Methods: Reference compound Me-NB1 (inhibition constant for hGluN1/GluN2B, 5.4 nM) and the phenolic precursor were prepared via multistep synthesis. Following chiral resolution by high-performance liquid chromatography, enantiopure precursor compounds, (R)-NB1 and (S)-NB1, were labeled with 11C and validated in rodents using in vitro/ex vivo autoradiography, PET experiments, and dose-response studies. To illustrate the translational relevance, (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 was validated in autoradiographic studies using postmortem human GluN2B-rich cortical and GluN2B-deficient cerebellar brain slices. To determine target engagement, receptor occupancy was assessed at different plasma concentrations of CP101,606, a GluN2B receptor antagonist. Results: The radiosynthesis of (R)- and (S)- 11C-Me-NB1 was accomplished in 42% ± 9% (decay-corrected) radiochemical yields. Molar activity ranged from 40 to 336 GBq/μmol, and an excellent radiochemical purity of greater than 99% was achieved. Although (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 displayed heterogeneous accumulation with high selectivity for the GluN2B-rich forebrain, (S)- 11C-Me-NB1 revealed a homogeneous distribution across all brain regions in rodent brain autoradiograms and predominantly exhibited σ1-receptor binding. Similar to rodent brain, (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 showed in postmortem human brain tissues higher binding in the cortex than in the cerebellum. Coincubation of the GluN2B-antagonist CERC-301 (1 μM) reduced cortical but not cerebellar binding, demonstrating the specificity of (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 binding to the human GluN2B-containing NMDA receptor. In vivo specificity of (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 in the GluN2B-expressing cortex, striatum, thalamus, and hippocampus was demonstrated by PET imaging in rodents. Applying GluN2B-antagonist eliprodil, an evident dose-response behavior was observed with (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 but not with (S)- 11C-Me-NB1. Our findings further underline the tightrope walk between GluN2B- and σ1-receptor-targeted imaging, illustrated by the entirely different receptor binding behavior of the 2 radioligand enantiomers. Conclusion: (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 is a highly selective and specific PET radioligand for imaging the GluN2B subunit of the NMDA receptor. The entirely different receptor binding behavior of (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 and (S)- 11C-Me-NB1 raises awareness of a delicate balance that is underlying the selective targeting of either GluN2B-carrying NMDA or σ1-receptors.
The study aims to investigate the performance characteristics of the enantiomers of 11C-Me-NB1, a recently reported PET imaging probe that targets the GluN2B subunit of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Methods: Reference compound Me-NB1 (inhibition constant for hGluN1/GluN2B, 5.4 nM) and the phenolic precursor were prepared via multistep synthesis. Following chiral resolution by high-performance liquid chromatography, enantiopure precursor compounds, (R)-NB1 and (S)-NB1, were labeled with 11C and validated in rodents using in vitro/ex vivo autoradiography, PET experiments, and dose-response studies. To illustrate the translational relevance, (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 was validated in autoradiographic studies using postmortem humanGluN2B-rich cortical and GluN2B-deficient cerebellar brain slices. To determine target engagement, receptor occupancy was assessed at different plasma concentrations of CP101,606, a GluN2B receptor antagonist. Results: The radiosynthesis of (R)- and (S)- 11C-Me-NB1 was accomplished in 42% ± 9% (decay-corrected) radiochemical yields. Molar activity ranged from 40 to 336 GBq/μmol, and an excellent radiochemical purity of greater than 99% was achieved. Although (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 displayed heterogeneous accumulation with high selectivity for the GluN2B-rich forebrain, (S)- 11C-Me-NB1 revealed a homogeneous distribution across all brain regions in rodent brain autoradiograms and predominantly exhibited σ1-receptor binding. Similar to rodent brain, (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 showed in postmortem human brain tissues higher binding in the cortex than in the cerebellum. Coincubation of the GluN2B-antagonist CERC-301 (1 μM) reduced cortical but not cerebellar binding, demonstrating the specificity of (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 binding to the humanGluN2B-containing NMDA receptor. In vivo specificity of (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 in the GluN2B-expressing cortex, striatum, thalamus, and hippocampus was demonstrated by PET imaging in rodents. Applying GluN2B-antagonist eliprodil, an evident dose-response behavior was observed with (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 but not with (S)- 11C-Me-NB1. Our findings further underline the tightrope walk between GluN2B- and σ1-receptor-targeted imaging, illustrated by the entirely different receptor binding behavior of the 2 radioligand enantiomers. Conclusion:(R)- 11C-Me-NB1 is a highly selective and specific PET radioligand for imaging the GluN2B subunit of the NMDA receptor. The entirely different receptor binding behavior of (R)- 11C-Me-NB1 and (S)- 11C-Me-NB1 raises awareness of a delicate balance that is underlying the selective targeting of either GluN2B-carrying NMDA or σ1-receptors.
Authors: M R Bullock; R E Merchant; C A Carmack; E Doppenberg; A K Shah; K D Wilner; G Ko; S A Williams Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 1999 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: G Roger; F Dollé; B De Bruin; X Liu; L Besret; Y Bramoullé; C Coulon; M Ottaviani; M Bottlaender; H Valette; M Kassiou Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sheldon H Preskorn; Bryan Baker; Sheela Kolluri; Frank S Menniti; Michael Krams; Jaren W Landen Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: John G Nutt; Steven A Gunzler; Trish Kirchhoff; Penelope Hogarth; Jerry L Weaver; Michael Krams; Brenda Jamerson; Frank S Menniti; Jaren W Landen Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Ahmed Haider; Zhiwei Xiao; Xiaotian Xia; Jiahui Chen; Richard S Van; Shi Kuang; Chunyu Zhao; Jian Rong; Tuo Shao; Perla Ramesh; Appu Aravind; Yihan Shao; Chongzhao Ran; Larry J Young; Steven H Liang Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Ahmed Haider; Chunyu Zhao; Lu Wang; Zhiwei Xiao; Jian Rong; Xiaotian Xia; Zhen Chen; Stefanie K Pfister; Natalia Mast; Eylan Yutuc; Jiahui Chen; Yinlong Li; Tuo Shao; Geoffrey I Warnock; Alyaa Dawoud; Theresa R Connors; Derek H Oakley; Huiyi Wei; Jinghao Wang; Zhihua Zheng; Hao Xu; April T Davenport; James B Daunais; Richard S Van; Yihan Shao; Yuqin Wang; Ming-Rong Zhang; Catherine Gebhard; Irina Pikuleva; Allan I Levey; William J Griffiths; Steven H Liang Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 19.319
Authors: Kelly Smart; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Hazem Ahmed; Hanyi Fang; Yuping Xu; Lisheng Cai; Daniel Holden; Michael Kapinos; Ahmed Haider; Zachary Felchner; Jim R Ropchan; Gilles Tamagnan; Robert B Innis; Victor W Pike; Simon M Ametamey; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 6.960
Authors: Lucas Rischka; Chrysoula Vraka; Verena Pichler; Sazan Rasul; Lukas Nics; Gregor Gryglewski; Patricia Handschuh; Matej Murgaš; Godber M Godbersen; Leo R Silberbauer; Jakob Unterholzner; Christoph Wotawa; Ahmed Haider; Hazem Ahmed; Roger Schibli; Thomas Mindt; Markus Mitterhauser; Wolfgang Wadsak; Andreas Hahn; Rupert Lanzenberger; Marcus Hacker; Simon M Ametamey Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Lisheng Cai; Jeih-San Liow; Cheryl L Morse; Sanjay Telu; Riley Davies; Michael P Frankland; Sami S Zoghbi; Ken Cheng; Matthew D Hall; Robert B Innis; Victor W Pike Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sabah Nisar; Ajaz A Bhat; Tariq Masoodi; Sheema Hashem; Sabah Akhtar; Tayyiba Akbar Ali; Sara Amjad; Sanjeev Chawla; Puneet Bagga; Michael P Frenneaux; Ravinder Reddy; Khalid Fakhro; Mohammad Haris Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 13.437
Authors: Hazem Ahmed; Livio Gisler; Nehal H Elghazawy; Claudia Keller; Wolfgang Sippl; Steven H Liang; Ahmed Haider; Simon M Ametamey Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-08-02