Literature DB >> 30683621

Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla.

Samer G Hakim1, Julia Glanz2, Markus Ofer3, Daniel Steller2, Peter Sieg2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary implant stability is crucial to osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess correlation of preoperative radiologic parameters with intraoperatively obtained biomechanical tests in the maxilla.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 259 implants were inserted in the maxilla of 99 patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived Hounsfield units (HU), voxel grey values and computed tomography mental index (CTMI) performed preoperatively were correlated with insertion torque and Periotest (obtained intraoperatively and 12 weeks later) to assess their prognostic value for primary implant stability.
RESULTS: Voxel grey values and insertion torque showed a low correlation (r = 0.329, p = 1.055×10-7 ). Likewise, a low correlation was found between HU measured preoperatively and insertion torque as well as intraoperative Periotest values (r = 0.297, p = 4×10-6 and r = - 0.234, p = 4.35×10-4, respectively). A moderate correlation could, however, be assessed between insertion torque and intraoperative as well as Periotest values 12 weeks later. (r = -0.555, p = 1.022×10-20 and -0.465. p = 1.150×10-13). On contrast, a high correlation was observed between the voxel grey values of CBCT and related HU (r = 0.710, p = 6.486×10-37 ) so that a conversion from grey values into HU could be suggested. According to regression analysis, an intraoperative negative Periotest value could be expected at an insertion torque of 40 N/cm upwards.
CONCLUSION: CBCT-based bone density parameters correlate with each other and allow conversion of grey scales into HU preoperatively. Both insertion torque and Periotest showed a significant correlation which enables regression analysis to predict implant stability for related insertion torque. On contrast, for HU the distribution curves do not allow a reliable assignment into certain Periotest values.
Copyright © 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Cone beam CT; Dental implants; Insertion torque; Maxilla; Resonance frequency analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30683621     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  2 in total

1.  The Importance of Correlation between CBCT Analysis of Bone Density and Primary Stability When Choosing the Design of Dental Implants-Ex Vivo Study.

Authors:  Mirko Mikic; Zoran Vlahovic; Momir Stevanović; Zoran Arsic; Rasa Mladenovic
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  Under-Drilling versus Hybrid Osseodensification Technique: Differences in Implant Primary Stability and Bone Density of the Implant Bed Walls.

Authors:  Rafael Delgado-Ruiz; Joshua Gold; Tanya Somohano Marquez; Georgios Romanos
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.